Click to bookmark this page!

- Contact Me -
Include your email address

<< March 2004 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31


Just in case you weren't sure...
If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:

Please sign the Ted Kennedy Resignation Petition!


rss feed

Shameless Self-Promotion

Buy this book (not just because it contains two of my op-eds):
Americans on Politics, Policy, and Pop Culture:
The 101 Best Opinion Editorials From OpEds.com


An Interview With the G-Man:
My first (hopefully not last) experience in live radio, being interviewed by G. Gordon Liddy!



Perspective
Joe Mariani

Number of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships by precision use of American military force under George W. Bush:
50 million in just two years

Number of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships by anti-American Bush-bashing terrorist-appeasing whining elitists:
Zero. Ever.
...

The problem seems to me to be the definition of "free speech". Liberals define it as anything they want to say or do that opposes America. I say "speech" ends where "action" begins. Once you pick up a gun for the enemy, throw a rock at a cop during a "peace" march, send money to a terrorist organisation, or travel to Baghdad to block an American JDAM with your ass, you have crossed the line from free speech to costly action.
...

Saying the War on Terror is all about al-Qaeda is like saying we should have fought the Japanese Naval Air Force after Pearl Harbor. Not the Japanese Navy, not the Japanese Army, not the Empire of Japan -- just the Naval Air Force.
...

Complaining about the "waste" when human embryos are destroyed instead of being used in medical experiments is a lot like going to a funeral and complaining about the waste of perfectly good meat.
...

Blaming CO2 for climate change is like blaming smoke for the fire. CO2 is largely a following, not a leading, indicator of a rise in temperature.
...

Cavalier's First Theorem:
Every time, Liberals will fight to protect the guilty and kill the innocent, while Conservatives will fight to protect the innocent and punish the guilty.

Cavalier's Second Theorem:
Liberals are just Socialists who want to be loved... then again, Socialists are just Communists who lack the courage of their convictions.

Cavalier's Third Theorem:
Any strongly moral, hawkish or pro-American statement by a Liberal will inevitably be followed by a "but."

Top News Headlines

Iraq Blogs

The Messopotamian
Iraq at a Glance
Iraq the Model
Hammorabi
Iraq & Iraqis
Nabil's Blog
Road of a Nation
The Sun of Iraq
Healing Iraq

Iraqi Bloggers Central

The Truth About Iraq
Liberating Iraq
Pictures from Iraq
The Iraqi Holocaust: a collection
Iraq's Mass Graves

Mudville Gazette:
News the media can't use

The Other Iraq:
The Iraq you never hear about in the MSM

Michael Yon - Online Magazine
Dispatches not filed from the Baghdad Hilton hot tub


United States Central Command


Humor

Infamous Monsters of Filmland

Day by Day: Chris Muir's witty comic strip with a political bent

The Ultimate War Simulation: Why does this scenario seem so familiar?

What Kind of Liberal Are You?
Save me the trouble of figuring out what kind of idiot you are

Blame Bush
Because Bush is to blame... for everything

Sacred Cow Burgers
Web Archive

Satirical Political Beliefs Test

Communists for Kerry

Cooper's Protester Guide

Fellowship 9/11: Sauron never attacked Rohan, Saruman did! Yet a small group of elitists convinced Middle-earth to divert resources from the real war to attack Mordor for personal gain.


Analysis

When Democrats Attack
Did prominent Democrats switch positions on Iraq just to attack President Bush for political gain? (See the updated list.)

Was Iraqi Freedom Justified?
An honest, step-by-step analysis of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq that Congress voted into law shows that it was.

Saddam's Philanthropy of Terror
Details of solid ties to organised international terrorism

How The Left Betrayed Iraq
by Naseer Flayih Hasan

Did We Botch The Occupation?
No, not of Iraq: of Germany. Read the media's take on how we "lost the peace" in 1946 and compare.

Debunking 8 Anti-War Myths About the Conflict in Iraq

Pictures from Hate Bush/Hate America/Hate Capitalism/Hate Israel/general wacko rallies
- by Zombie

Jihad Watch


2004 Election Links

Looosers: Sorry, Everybody!
Winners: You're Welcome, Everybody!


2008 Election

Peace Through Strength PAC


Duncan Hunter in 2008
official site



Click to join duncanhunterforpresident2008 at Yahoo! Groups

Useful Links

FamilyWishList
Share your wish list with friends and family

Virtual Tourist
Travel tips from real travelers

RemBot.com
Appointment calendar with email/wireless notification

PriceGrabber.com
Convenient comparison shopping


Reading Material

RightWingNews
The best right-wing news and commentary

GOP USA Commentary Corner

Men's News Daily
The New Media

OpinionEditorials.com
a project of Frontiers of Freedom

ChronWatch
SF Chronicle watchdog and conservative news

American Daily
Analysis with political and social commentary

The Conservative Voice
Conservative news and opinion

News By Us
...not news bias

IntellectualConservative.com
Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics

CommonConservative.com
Practical conservatism for the common man

USASentinel
Analysis, Commentary and Opinion on the Real World

PhillyFuture.org
Philly news and blogs


Now Reading

The Fatal Conceit:
The Errors of Socialism
by F. A. Hayek



Articles Previously Published at
Useless-Knowledge.com

- When Good Liberals Go Bad - 05/29/03
- How Stupid Do Democrats Think You Are? - 05/31/03
- Who Are These 'Rich' Getting Tax Cuts, Anyway? - 06/02/03
- How Can We Miss The Clintons If They Won't Go Away? - 06/04/03
- Whining of Mass Distraction: How To Discredit A President - 06/05/03
- Liberal "Rules" for Arguing - 06/10/03
- Liberalism: Curable or Terminal? - 06/14/03
- Filibustering Judges: Hijacking Presidential Powers? - 06/17/03
- Is Hamas Exempt from the War on Terror? - 06/22/03
- How Malleable Is The Constitution? - 06/26/03
- Rejecting Our Biological and Cultural Heritage - 06/30/03
- I Need Liberal Assistance, Now! - 07/02/03
- Bring Them On - 07/03/03
- We Need You Arrogant Warmongering Americans...Again - 07/09/03
- Much Ado About Nothing, Again - 07/13/03
- Double Standard: Blindly Blame Bush - 07/18/03
- Was WWII Also Unjustified? - 07/20/03
- Clinton Backing Bush? Don't Bet On It! - 07/24/03
- How To Be A Hypocritical Liberal - 07/28/03
- The Clinton Legacy: In Answer to Mr. Stensrud - 07/30/03
-What Is 'Good News' To Liberals? - 08/02/03
- Bush's Big Blunder - 08/06/03
- The Meaning of Right - Why I Supported the Iraq War - 08/10/03
- More Liberal "Rules" for Arguing - 08/14/03
- You Can Have Cary Grant; I'll Take John Wayne! - 08/19/03
- Where Is The ACLU When It's Actually Needed? - 08/25/03
- Who's Afraid Of The Big Bad Ten Commandments? - 08/28/03
- From The Weasels: Thanks For Nothing - 08/30/03
- The Liberal Superfriends - 09/02/03
- Liberal Superfriends 2: The Sequel - 09/05/03
- Saddam and 9/11: Connect the Dots - 09/08/03
- Throwing Away the Southern Vote - 11/02/03
- Libya: The First Domino Falls - 12/20/03
- Is the UN Playing Games with American Politics? - 03/04/04


Blogs to Browse

Across the Pond
AlphaPatriot
Arts for Democracy
Betsy's Page
Bill Karl
Blonde Sagacity
Bull Moose Strikes Back
Common Sense & Wonder
Conservative Pleasure
Dangerous Logic
DowneastBlog
ElectionProjection
Everything I Know Is Wrong
Freedom of Thought
Sally Girl
Korla Pundit
LogiPundit.com
MarkLevinFan
Mark Nicodemo
Michelle Malkin
Moonbattery
My Arse From My Elbow
QandO Blog
RadioBS.net
Rebel Rouser
RightThinkingGirl
Sally Girl
Samantha Burns
Semi-Intelligent Thoughts
Sighed Effects
Sister Toldjah
Stark Truth
Take A Stand Against Liberals
The Resplendent Mango
The Right Society
The YNC
Tom's Common Sense
Tom DeLay
Tomfoolery of the Highest Order
Trying to Grok
TS Right Dominion
Violent Daydreams
Watcher of Weasels
Word Around the Net
WuzzaDem.com



Locations of visitors to this page


Thursday, March 25, 2004
Democratic Dishonesty In Pennsylvania

I don't normally simply cut-and-paste news stories, but no commentary I can make can highlight the disgusting dishonesty reported in the following AP news story better than the simple facts. If this is the level of fraud the Democrats are willing to sink to in a simple Senatorial primary, what will they do to defeat President Bush in the national election this November?
More to the point... what won't they do?

Union Urges Democrats to Switch Parties

By LARA JAKES JORDAN
The Associated Press

WASHINGTON - An international labor union is urging its Democratic members in Pennsylvania to switch their voter registration to Republican to vote for Sen. Arlen Specter in his tough primary fight against conservative Rep. Pat Toomey.

The registration push comes as national groups scramble to sign up voters for November's presidential race in Pennsylvania, a battleground state and the nation's fifth-largest electoral prize. Voters who don't switch back risk falling through the cracks during Democratic get-out-the-vote drives and other outreach efforts.

Specter, a political moderate who generally supports labor issues, is the only sitting senator in the nation to face a primary. He "needs as much support in the April 27 primary as possible," wrote Robert A. Scardelletti, president of the Transportation Communications International Union in a March 15 letter to Pennsylvania members.

"Enclosed is a voter registration card that you can use to register to vote in the Republican primary if you so choose," Scardelletti wrote in the letter, a copy of which was obtained by The Associated Press. "I realize that this is a somewhat unusual request, but I can assure you that it is vitally important.

While labor unions generally support Democrats, Scardelletti's letter was accompanied by instructions from the Specter campaign on how to register to vote. Scardelletti did not immediately return a phone call seeking comment Wednesday.

Registered Democrats outnumber Republicans by about 445,000 voters in Pennsylvania. The state's primary voter registration deadline is March 29.

Pennsylvania, a political swing state that swung for Democrat Al Gore by a mere 204,000 votes in 2000, is on the national forefront of an intense push this year by both parties to recruit voters. Parties use registration rolls to target voters with campaign fliers and, in turn, push them to the polls.

Since many union members are expected to support Democratic presumptive presidential nominee John Kerry in November, "it's probably not necessary for them to switch back," said Norman Adler, a New York-based political consultant who advises unions.

Even so, "it's very hard" for union leaders to persuade their members to go through yet another registration switch so soon after the first, Adler said. He called the union's push to switch voter registration highly unusual in a U.S. Senate race.

Aides to Toomey, the conservative challenger, said the union support indicates a "late, frantic appeal" to Democrats by Specter.

"The fact that this appeal comes just days before the registration deadline illustrates that Arlen Specter is aware that he doesn't have sufficient support among Republicans to win this race," Toomey campaign spokesman Joe Sterns said.

But Specter campaign manager Christopher Nicholas said Specter would work with any group to try to boost the number of Republican voters in the state to help President Bush in November.

"And we are working with any group that wants to work with us," Nicholas said.

Posted at Thursday, March 25, 2004 by CavalierX

Jamie G
March 26, 2004   09:07 AM PST
 
I heard about it this morning on Fox News. It doesn't surprise me at all. Living in Alabama all my life I've seen just about any dirty political trick invented (from both parties). And after what I heard about some of the Dem shenanigans during the 2000 Pres election, this seems mild in comparison. But haven't they always done these kinds of things? The kicker is this - look at how bold and brazen they are to just come out and announce this. Didn't you hear Kerry when he was campaigning in FLA and said that during this years election he planned "to have a legal team ready" in case there were problems again in the Florida voting? I'm sure that they have teams ready in all of the states where they anticipate the voting to be close.

StarkTruth
March 26, 2004   09:13 AM PST
 
Sad, very sad indeed. I hope the GOP voters take note of this ridiculous move.
Jamie G
March 26, 2004   09:36 AM PST
 
Note at the end of the article that Specters' campaign manager said "Specter would work with any group to try to boost the number of Republican voters in the state to help President Bush in November."
What a joke - Specter is only trying to boost HIS chances in the Republican primary - not Pres. Bush's chances. The Dems are pretty obviously going to change BACK to their party after the primary. Politicians really DO think that all voters are stupid and clueless. Some, maybe, but not ALL.
Jamie G.
March 26, 2004   01:24 PM PST
 
Here is an interesting little tidbit:

WASHINGTON, March 25 (UPI) -- Pop star Michael Jackson plans to visit Washington next week to share his views on world affairs with with members of the Congressional Black Caucus.

Its from an article in the Wash Times. Makes you wonder just how these people get elected!
JM
March 26, 2004   02:58 PM PST
 
>Michael Jackson plans to visit
>Washington next week to share
>his views on world affairs

Did it say which world?
Jamie G.
March 26, 2004   03:38 PM PST
 
It must be that dream world where the Democrats have control of Congress and the Presidency. Here is a quote by Rep. William Lacy Clay, D-Mo., whom the paper identifies as "a proponent of the visit," "It is good we show our support to Michael Jackson," Clay said. "He gives so much of himself monetarily and through his talent." Wonder if John Kerry has made it around ot asking Michael for a donation to his campaign?
Jamie G.
March 26, 2004   03:47 PM PST
 
It appears that the Republicans are getting serious about undoing any harm by Dick Clarke - they are seeking to declassify Clarke's testimony to Congress back in 2002, since what he is claiming now is contradictory to what he testified to before the House and Senate intelligence committees. so, since he is claiming that what he is saying now is the truth, then he must have lied under oath. I'm sure that he will imply that "the administration told him to lie to Congress".
Jamie G.
March 26, 2004   03:51 PM PST
 
Great article on NRO -
http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/york200403260848.asp
Jamie G.
March 26, 2004   04:04 PM PST
 
Another great article - this one is about John McCain... this one is at NRO....http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/samples200403260844.asp

Sorry - I don't know how to create a link to the story....
JM
March 26, 2004   04:30 PM PST
 
It's ok... you can't create links in this comments section, nor do any formatting.
Jamie G.
March 26, 2004   04:34 PM PST
 
I really didn't know who Arlen Specter was when I read your entry today - I had heard his name before. Well, I just read an article about him on NRO ("Flashback: John. J. Miller on the worst senator"). I understand now why the Democrats like him so much. How he can call himself a Republican is amazing.
JM
March 26, 2004   04:42 PM PST
 
Specter's a RINO (Republican In Name Only). That's why the Dems prefer him over a Conservative like Toomey. This story alone should give any Conservatives who were thinking about voting for Specter a pause. "Why do Democrats want HIM?"
Jamie G.
March 26, 2004   04:50 PM PST
 
The article that I had just read on NRO is saying that the conservatives are asking themselves why they even want him. He and John McCain should join forces and switch parties - maybe Kerry will put them both in his cabinet if he is elected.
huckupchuck
March 27, 2004   11:30 PM PST
 
Couple of points ... First, let's note that it's not the Democrats that are proposing this strategy, but rather Specter. Last I heard, Specter was a registered Republican. Second, if I were a Democrat in PA, I'd WANT a Toomey nomination over Specter. It would make a victory by the Democratic Challenger all the more likely, especially since Specter is likely to win some Democratic votes, but Toomey will most certainly not.
JM
March 27, 2004   11:37 PM PST
 
Sorry, huckupchuck, you should have read the item... it's the International TCI Union that's proposing election fraud to its largely Democratic membership. Specter may be registered a Republican, but he's a RINO. Third, if you were a Democrat in PA, you'd be doing this so that no matter who wins, he's NOT a Conservative.
Question to everyone else: what IS it about the Left that requires perfectly clear points already stated to be repeated over and over?
huckupchuck
March 28, 2004   01:32 AM PST
 
First off, CavalierX, it's not election "fraud" though I admit it is a pretty sleazy tactic. Second, how would you interpret this part of the article: "While labor unions generally support Democrats, Scardelletti's letter was accompanied by instructions from the Specter campaign on how to register to vote." Also, if Toomey's campaign is to be believed, the Specter campaign is behind this last minute shenanigan. So, I look at it this way ... either Specter is behind this sleazy enterprise as the Toomey campaign contends, or Toomey is a two-bit smearer of his fellow Republican opponent. In either case, what you get is a low-roader Republican candidate -- and in all likelihood, thus, a Democratic Senator.
JM
March 28, 2004   06:38 AM PST
 
Hehheh... how like you, Huckupchuck, to try and COMPLETELY excuse the Democrats. Nope, nothing to do with this, not at all. Have another glass of Kool-Aid. By the way, you can get those " instructions from the Specter campaign on how to register to vote" on the Web.
huckupchuck
March 28, 2004   09:17 AM PST
 
So you can load these forms off Specter's website. OK. But how do you explain the Toomey campaign's charges? Is Toomey believable on this matter when his campaign points the finger not at Democrats but at Specter? Or is Toomey just a crass liar and smearer? I'd imagine you'd want to believe the 'venerable' and 'truthful' Toomey campaign when they claim this sleazy move "indicates a 'late, frantic appeal' to Democrats by Specter." You accuse me of excusing the Democrats; but it seems that you, my friend, are COMPLETELY excusing your Republicans.
JM
March 28, 2004   09:35 AM PST
 
First, they're not "my" Republicans, as I have no party affiliation. I'm Conservative, and we have no actual party. Second, I have not seen the evidence that points to Specter's direct involvement. Perhaps Toomey has. But I'd like to see the evidence before I make a judgement.
Note: this is one of the things which separates Conservatives from Liberals, in general.
 

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments




Previous Entry Home Next Entry