Click to bookmark this page!

- Contact Me -
Include your email address

<< April 2004 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01 02 03
04 05 06 07 08 09 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30


Just in case you weren't sure...
If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:

Please sign the Ted Kennedy Resignation Petition!


rss feed

Shameless Self-Promotion

Buy this book (not just because it contains two of my op-eds):
Americans on Politics, Policy, and Pop Culture:
The 101 Best Opinion Editorials From OpEds.com


An Interview With the G-Man:
My first (hopefully not last) experience in live radio, being interviewed by G. Gordon Liddy!



Perspective
Joe Mariani

Number of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships by precision use of American military force under George W. Bush:
50 million in just two years

Number of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships by anti-American Bush-bashing terrorist-appeasing whining elitists:
Zero. Ever.
...

The problem seems to me to be the definition of "free speech". Liberals define it as anything they want to say or do that opposes America. I say "speech" ends where "action" begins. Once you pick up a gun for the enemy, throw a rock at a cop during a "peace" march, send money to a terrorist organisation, or travel to Baghdad to block an American JDAM with your ass, you have crossed the line from free speech to costly action.
...

Saying the War on Terror is all about al-Qaeda is like saying we should have fought the Japanese Naval Air Force after Pearl Harbor. Not the Japanese Navy, not the Japanese Army, not the Empire of Japan -- just the Naval Air Force.
...

Complaining about the "waste" when human embryos are destroyed instead of being used in medical experiments is a lot like going to a funeral and complaining about the waste of perfectly good meat.
...

Blaming CO2 for climate change is like blaming smoke for the fire. CO2 is largely a following, not a leading, indicator of a rise in temperature.
...

Cavalier's First Theorem:
Every time, Liberals will fight to protect the guilty and kill the innocent, while Conservatives will fight to protect the innocent and punish the guilty.

Cavalier's Second Theorem:
Liberals are just Socialists who want to be loved... then again, Socialists are just Communists who lack the courage of their convictions.

Cavalier's Third Theorem:
Any strongly moral, hawkish or pro-American statement by a Liberal will inevitably be followed by a "but."

Top News Headlines

Iraq Blogs

The Messopotamian
Iraq at a Glance
Iraq the Model
Hammorabi
Iraq & Iraqis
Nabil's Blog
Road of a Nation
The Sun of Iraq
Healing Iraq

Iraqi Bloggers Central

The Truth About Iraq
Liberating Iraq
Pictures from Iraq
The Iraqi Holocaust: a collection
Iraq's Mass Graves

Mudville Gazette:
News the media can't use

The Other Iraq:
The Iraq you never hear about in the MSM

Michael Yon - Online Magazine
Dispatches not filed from the Baghdad Hilton hot tub


United States Central Command


Humor

Infamous Monsters of Filmland

Day by Day: Chris Muir's witty comic strip with a political bent

The Ultimate War Simulation: Why does this scenario seem so familiar?

What Kind of Liberal Are You?
Save me the trouble of figuring out what kind of idiot you are

Blame Bush
Because Bush is to blame... for everything

Sacred Cow Burgers
Web Archive

Satirical Political Beliefs Test

Communists for Kerry

Cooper's Protester Guide

Fellowship 9/11: Sauron never attacked Rohan, Saruman did! Yet a small group of elitists convinced Middle-earth to divert resources from the real war to attack Mordor for personal gain.


Analysis

When Democrats Attack
Did prominent Democrats switch positions on Iraq just to attack President Bush for political gain? (See the updated list.)

Was Iraqi Freedom Justified?
An honest, step-by-step analysis of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq that Congress voted into law shows that it was.

Saddam's Philanthropy of Terror
Details of solid ties to organised international terrorism

How The Left Betrayed Iraq
by Naseer Flayih Hasan

Did We Botch The Occupation?
No, not of Iraq: of Germany. Read the media's take on how we "lost the peace" in 1946 and compare.

Debunking 8 Anti-War Myths About the Conflict in Iraq

Pictures from Hate Bush/Hate America/Hate Capitalism/Hate Israel/general wacko rallies
- by Zombie

Jihad Watch


2004 Election Links

Looosers: Sorry, Everybody!
Winners: You're Welcome, Everybody!


2008 Election

Peace Through Strength PAC


Duncan Hunter in 2008
official site



Click to join duncanhunterforpresident2008 at Yahoo! Groups

Useful Links

FamilyWishList
Share your wish list with friends and family

Virtual Tourist
Travel tips from real travelers

RemBot.com
Appointment calendar with email/wireless notification

PriceGrabber.com
Convenient comparison shopping


Reading Material

RightWingNews
The best right-wing news and commentary

GOP USA Commentary Corner

Men's News Daily
The New Media

OpinionEditorials.com
a project of Frontiers of Freedom

ChronWatch
SF Chronicle watchdog and conservative news

American Daily
Analysis with political and social commentary

The Conservative Voice
Conservative news and opinion

News By Us
...not news bias

IntellectualConservative.com
Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics

CommonConservative.com
Practical conservatism for the common man

USASentinel
Analysis, Commentary and Opinion on the Real World

PhillyFuture.org
Philly news and blogs


Now Reading

The Fatal Conceit:
The Errors of Socialism
by F. A. Hayek



Articles Previously Published at
Useless-Knowledge.com

- When Good Liberals Go Bad - 05/29/03
- How Stupid Do Democrats Think You Are? - 05/31/03
- Who Are These 'Rich' Getting Tax Cuts, Anyway? - 06/02/03
- How Can We Miss The Clintons If They Won't Go Away? - 06/04/03
- Whining of Mass Distraction: How To Discredit A President - 06/05/03
- Liberal "Rules" for Arguing - 06/10/03
- Liberalism: Curable or Terminal? - 06/14/03
- Filibustering Judges: Hijacking Presidential Powers? - 06/17/03
- Is Hamas Exempt from the War on Terror? - 06/22/03
- How Malleable Is The Constitution? - 06/26/03
- Rejecting Our Biological and Cultural Heritage - 06/30/03
- I Need Liberal Assistance, Now! - 07/02/03
- Bring Them On - 07/03/03
- We Need You Arrogant Warmongering Americans...Again - 07/09/03
- Much Ado About Nothing, Again - 07/13/03
- Double Standard: Blindly Blame Bush - 07/18/03
- Was WWII Also Unjustified? - 07/20/03
- Clinton Backing Bush? Don't Bet On It! - 07/24/03
- How To Be A Hypocritical Liberal - 07/28/03
- The Clinton Legacy: In Answer to Mr. Stensrud - 07/30/03
-What Is 'Good News' To Liberals? - 08/02/03
- Bush's Big Blunder - 08/06/03
- The Meaning of Right - Why I Supported the Iraq War - 08/10/03
- More Liberal "Rules" for Arguing - 08/14/03
- You Can Have Cary Grant; I'll Take John Wayne! - 08/19/03
- Where Is The ACLU When It's Actually Needed? - 08/25/03
- Who's Afraid Of The Big Bad Ten Commandments? - 08/28/03
- From The Weasels: Thanks For Nothing - 08/30/03
- The Liberal Superfriends - 09/02/03
- Liberal Superfriends 2: The Sequel - 09/05/03
- Saddam and 9/11: Connect the Dots - 09/08/03
- Throwing Away the Southern Vote - 11/02/03
- Libya: The First Domino Falls - 12/20/03
- Is the UN Playing Games with American Politics? - 03/04/04


Blogs to Browse

Across the Pond
AlphaPatriot
Arts for Democracy
Betsy's Page
Bill Karl
Blonde Sagacity
Bull Moose Strikes Back
Common Sense & Wonder
Conservative Pleasure
Dangerous Logic
DowneastBlog
ElectionProjection
Everything I Know Is Wrong
Freedom of Thought
Sally Girl
Korla Pundit
LogiPundit.com
MarkLevinFan
Mark Nicodemo
Michelle Malkin
Moonbattery
My Arse From My Elbow
QandO Blog
RadioBS.net
Rebel Rouser
RightThinkingGirl
Sally Girl
Samantha Burns
Semi-Intelligent Thoughts
Sighed Effects
Sister Toldjah
Stark Truth
Take A Stand Against Liberals
The Resplendent Mango
The Right Society
The YNC
Tom's Common Sense
Tom DeLay
Tomfoolery of the Highest Order
Trying to Grok
TS Right Dominion
Violent Daydreams
Watcher of Weasels
Word Around the Net
WuzzaDem.com



Locations of visitors to this page


Sunday, April 18, 2004
Who's Quoting Who?

Pop quiz: Who recently said the following?

"This war makes millions of dollars for big corporations, either weapons manufacturers or those working in the reconstruction [of Iraq], such as Halliburton and its sister companies...

"It is crystal clear who benefits from igniting the fire of this war and this bloodshed: They are the merchants of war, the bloodsuckers who run the policy of the world from behind the scenes.

"President Bush and his ilk, the media giants... all are a fatal danger to the world..."

Was it a) Osama bin Laden, b) John Kerry, c) a MoveOn.org ad, d) Robert Byrd or e) Ted Kennedy?


The answer, of course, is a) Osama bin Laden. But why was it so hard to choose, if you didn't already know the answer? Has anyone noticed that America's worst enemies and leading Democrats are starting to sound alike? Last week Ted Kennedy, Bobby Byrd and Moqtada al-Sadr all used the same troop-demoralising line about Iraq being Vietnam to attack President Bush. Can you imagine the Republicans quoting Emperor Hirohito or Adolf Hitler during the 1944 election campaign? Perhaps they could have quoted Prime Minister Tojo, when he said in 1942, "America that is suffering repeated defeats is trying to cover its mortal blow by relying on vicious propaganda and is in a desperate condition trying to cover the rising criticism within the country and to preserve the right of neutral countries." Would attacking the President using the enemy's words have won over the American people in 1944? Would telling US troops that they were fighting a war for immoral reasons, that they were bound to fail, and that their commander-in-chief was a terrible person have won the election?

Certainly not then, and I hope it doesn't now.

Posted at Sunday, April 18, 2004 by CavalierX

alan
April 18, 2004   09:47 AM PDT
 
Bin laden sounding desperate, also failed with his attempt to split us and europe

Try this site out it has an update on the photo seems it is likely to be a fake, although did suspect it from the start

http://www.gravett.org/Israellycool/

alan
JM
April 18, 2004   10:18 AM PDT
 
Yes, Alan, the photo was a fake by the pro-terrorist anti-American group CAIR.
http://www.imagedump.com/index.cgi?pick=get&tp=59682&user=all3
StarkTruth
April 19, 2004   09:00 AM PDT
 
What I love about John Kerry is he says in one breathe "The President does not have a plan for the war in Iraq" then turns around in the very next breathe and says "I am not sure what my plan would be but I would surely have the UN involved"
JM
April 19, 2004   09:07 AM PDT
 
He wants to turn Iraq over to the UN, which has done such a wonderful job in Bosnia that after five years of UN ineptitude, the people want their brutal dictator back!
Jamie from Ala
April 20, 2004   04:24 PM PDT
 
John Kerry can't seem to make up his mind just what he does or doesn't support. Last week he was saying Iraq was a failure, yet this week he is saying that it "isn't quite a failure". Is it a failure or isn't it?

Did anyone see Kerry's interview on "Meet the Press"? Did he directly answer any of Russert's questions? There is a little bit about the interview in "Best of the Web" for Monday, April 19th out there on OpinonJournal.com.
JM
April 20, 2004   04:28 PM PDT
 
Kerry is killing his own campaign. And Jamie, I believe you were my 10,000th visitor. Thanks.
Jamie from Ala
April 20, 2004   04:34 PM PDT
 
You are very welcome.
Mark Adams
April 21, 2004   02:11 AM PDT
 
I hate to break up the mutual admiration society, but did any of you Kerry/UN bashers happen to notice that the President said in his press conference that he would be turning over Iraqi sovereignty to whomever UN representative Brahimi said he should. We need the UN now, will in the future, and Bush could have been more diplomatic with the diplomats there in the past.
JM
April 21, 2004   04:15 AM PDT
 
The UN is good at organisation and humanitarian aid. They're terrible at just about everything else. Bush is right to let them run the things they're good at, while NOT letting them ruin Iraq, which Kerry would do. We don't need another Kosovo; one is bad enough.
Jamie G.
April 21, 2004   11:29 AM PDT
 
You may think we are bashing Kerry, but everything said here is true - he flips and flops on just about everything without anything changing in between. Bush did not want the U.N. involved in the enforcement of the U.N.s own resolutions. The U.N. did not have a place in making military decisions in re to the regime change in Iraq because they allowed SH to remain in power for years and merely issued new resolutions after SH failed to comply with the umpteen earlier resolutions. Now that SH has been removed from power, there is a place for the U.N. to help -with the elections, humanitarian aid, etc. Point made - Bush changes as the situation changes. Kerry changes as the POLL NUMBERS change.
Mark Adams
April 21, 2004   11:51 PM PDT
 
Jamie, I was going to leave this alone, but I honestly see Bush only changing his course on so many things only reluctantly, almost a pattern. eg: His tax cuts, he promised them because he sold the idea that we should have our money back when there was a surplus. he didn't change his tax cut policy, just the reason for it after the recession hit. Whether you agree with the policy or not, he wouldn't even consider a modification to the cuts to pay for the $87 million. Steadfast if you are with the idea. Stubborn if not.

Only giving an hour to the 9/11 commission now changed to answering all the questions only after getting flak from his own party faithful. Troop strength increase, only after the worst month yet in Iraq, long after "mission accomplished." Turning over sovereignty to whomever the UN decides, but not moving that artifical deadline, because the caucus plan fell apart and so is the chance for elections anytime soon in the current climate. Naturally Kerry looks like a waffle in comparison.

The UN is the last resort here and only being turned to because POTUS must. There is nothing else.

Of course the UN is an incompetent agency for making war. It was designed to prevent it. Hans Blix did not want to go down in history as the man who said, "Yep (or maybe 'ja'), fuggettaboutit, bomb the lying bastard. Saddam's got VX somewhere, but he hid it, he must have." UN diplomats didn't sign up to make war, but to give us hope for peace.

If anyone left SH in power it was us. It was Clinton. It was Blair. 9/11 changed a lot. Up til then, with only a suspicion of the corruption in the food for oil debacle, and SH's only danger seeming to be the occasional pot shot at an F-15, which promptly blew the AA site to hell, the American people would never have supported them in a costly invasion or grand scheme to reform the entire region. Especially in the wag the dog climate after zippergate.

It was us, all of us, not just or because of the UN.
 

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments




Previous Entry Home Next Entry