 Click to bookmark this page!
- Contact Me - Include your email address
 Just in case you weren't sure...
Please sign the Ted Kennedy Resignation Petition!
Shameless Self-PromotionBuy this book (not just because it contains two of my op-eds):
Americans on Politics, Policy, and Pop Culture: The 101 Best Opinion Editorials From OpEds.com

An Interview With the G-Man:
My first (hopefully not last) experience in live radio, being interviewed by G. Gordon Liddy!
Perspective Joe
MarianiNumber
of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships
by precision use of American military force
under George W. Bush: 50
million in just two years
Number
of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships
by anti-American Bush-bashing
terrorist-appeasing whining elitists: Zero. Ever.
...The problem seems to
me to be the definition of "free speech".
Liberals define it as anything they want to say
or do that opposes America. I say "speech" ends
where "action" begins. Once you pick up a gun
for the enemy, throw a rock at a cop during a
"peace" march, send money to a terrorist
organisation, or travel to Baghdad to block an
American JDAM with your ass, you have crossed the line from free speech to costly action. ...
Saying the War on Terror is all about al-Qaeda is like saying we should have fought the Japanese Naval Air Force after Pearl Harbor. Not the Japanese Navy, not the Japanese Army, not the Empire of Japan -- just the Naval Air Force. ...Complaining about the "waste" when human embryos are destroyed instead of being used in medical experiments is a lot like going to a funeral and complaining about the waste of perfectly good meat. ...Blaming CO2 for climate change is like blaming smoke for the fire. CO2 is largely a following, not a leading, indicator of a rise in temperature. ...
Cavalier's First Theorem: Every time, Liberals will fight to protect the guilty and kill the innocent, while Conservatives will fight to protect the innocent and punish the guilty.
Cavalier's Second Theorem: Liberals are just Socialists who want to be loved... then again, Socialists are just Communists who lack the courage of their convictions.
Cavalier's Third Theorem: Any strongly moral, hawkish or pro-American statement by a Liberal will inevitably be followed by a "but."
Top News Headlines
Iraq
Blogs
The Messopotamian Iraq at a Glance Iraq the Model
Hammorabi Iraq & Iraqis Nabil's Blog Road of a Nation The Sun of Iraq
Healing Iraq
Iraqi Bloggers Central
The Truth About Iraq Liberating Iraq
Pictures from Iraq The Iraqi Holocaust: a collection
Iraq's Mass Graves
Mudville Gazette: News the media can't use
The Other Iraq: The Iraq you never hear about in the MSM
Michael Yon - Online Magazine Dispatches not filed from the Baghdad Hilton hot tub
 United States Central Command
Humor
Infamous Monsters of Filmland
Day by Day:
Chris Muir's witty comic strip with a political
bent
The Ultimate War Simulation: Why does this scenario seem so familiar?
What Kind of Liberal Are You? Save me the trouble
of figuring out what kind of idiot you
are
Blame
Bush Because Bush is to blame... for
everything
Sacred Cow Burgers Web Archive
Satirical Political Beliefs
Test
Communists for Kerry
Cooper's Protester Guide
Fellowship 9/11: Sauron never attacked Rohan, Saruman did! Yet a small group of elitists convinced Middle-earth to divert resources from the real war to attack Mordor for personal gain.
Analysis
When Democrats Attack Did prominent Democrats switch positions on Iraq just to attack President Bush for political gain? (See the updated list.)
Was Iraqi Freedom Justified? An honest, step-by-step analysis of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq that Congress voted into law shows that it was.
Saddam's Philanthropy of Terror Details of solid ties to organised international terrorism
How The Left Betrayed Iraq by Naseer Flayih Hasan
Did We Botch The
Occupation? No, not of Iraq: of Germany. Read the
media's take on how we "lost the peace" in 1946
and compare.
Debunking 8 Anti-War Myths About the Conflict in Iraq
Pictures from Hate
Bush/Hate America/Hate Capitalism/Hate
Israel/general wacko rallies - by
Zombie
Jihad Watch
2004 Election Links
Looosers: Sorry, Everybody!
Winners: You're Welcome, Everybody!
2008 ElectionPeace Through Strength PAC Duncan Hunter in 2008 official site
Click to join duncanhunterforpresident2008 at Yahoo! Groups
Useful Links
FamilyWishList Share your wish list with friends and family
Virtual Tourist Travel tips from real travelers
RemBot.com Appointment calendar with email/wireless notification
PriceGrabber.com Convenient comparison shopping
Reading
MaterialRightWingNews
The best right-wing news and commentary
GOP USA Commentary
Corner
Men's News Daily The New Media
OpinionEditorials.com a project of Frontiers of Freedom
ChronWatch SF Chronicle watchdog and conservative news
American Daily Analysis with political and social commentary
The Conservative Voice Conservative news and opinion
News By Us ...not news bias
IntellectualConservative.com Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics
CommonConservative.com Practical conservatism for the common man
USASentinel Analysis, Commentary and Opinion on the Real World
PhillyFuture.org Philly news and blogs
Now ReadingThe Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism by F. A. Hayek

Articles Previously Published at
Useless-Knowledge.com
- When Good Liberals Go
Bad - 05/29/03 - How Stupid Do Democrats Think You
Are? - 05/31/03 - Who Are These 'Rich' Getting Tax
Cuts, Anyway? - 06/02/03 - How Can We Miss The Clintons If
They Won't Go Away? - 06/04/03 -
Whining of Mass Distraction: How
To Discredit A President -
06/05/03 - Liberal "Rules" for Arguing
- 06/10/03 - Liberalism: Curable or
Terminal? - 06/14/03 - Filibustering Judges: Hijacking
Presidential Powers? - 06/17/03 -
Is Hamas Exempt from the War on
Terror? - 06/22/03 - How Malleable Is The
Constitution? - 06/26/03 - Rejecting Our Biological and
Cultural Heritage - 06/30/03 - I Need Liberal Assistance,
Now! - 07/02/03 - Bring Them On -
07/03/03 - We Need You Arrogant Warmongering
Americans...Again - 07/09/03 - Much Ado About Nothing, Again
- 07/13/03 - Double Standard: Blindly Blame
Bush - 07/18/03 - Was WWII Also Unjustified?
- 07/20/03 - Clinton Backing Bush? Don't Bet On
It! - 07/24/03 - How To Be A Hypocritical
Liberal - 07/28/03 - The Clinton Legacy: In Answer to
Mr. Stensrud - 07/30/03 -What Is 'Good News' To
Liberals? - 08/02/03 - Bush's Big Blunder -
08/06/03 - The Meaning of Right - Why I
Supported the Iraq War -
08/10/03 - More Liberal "Rules" for
Arguing - 08/14/03 - You Can Have Cary Grant; I'll Take
John Wayne! - 08/19/03 - Where Is The ACLU When It's
Actually Needed? - 08/25/03 - Who's Afraid Of The Big Bad Ten
Commandments? - 08/28/03 - From The Weasels: Thanks For
Nothing - 08/30/03 - The Liberal
Superfriends - 09/02/03 - Liberal Superfriends 2: The
Sequel - 09/05/03 - Saddam and 9/11: Connect the
Dots - 09/08/03 - Throwing Away the Southern
Vote - 11/02/03 - Libya: The First Domino
Falls - 12/20/03 - Is the UN Playing Games with
American Politics? - 03/04/04
Blogs to Browse
Across the Pond
AlphaPatriot
Arts for Democracy
Betsy's Page
Bill Karl
Blonde Sagacity
Bull Moose Strikes Back
Common Sense & Wonder
Conservative Pleasure
Dangerous Logic
DowneastBlog
ElectionProjection
Everything I Know Is Wrong
Freedom of Thought
Sally Girl
Korla Pundit
LogiPundit.com
MarkLevinFan
Mark Nicodemo
Michelle Malkin
Moonbattery
My Arse From My Elbow
QandO Blog
RadioBS.net
Rebel Rouser
RightThinkingGirl
Sally Girl
Samantha Burns
Semi-Intelligent Thoughts
Sighed Effects
Sister Toldjah
Stark Truth
Take A Stand Against Liberals
The Resplendent Mango
The Right Society
The YNC
Tom's Common Sense
Tom DeLay
Tomfoolery of the Highest Order
Trying to Grok
TS Right Dominion
Violent Daydreams
Watcher of Weasels
Word Around the Net
WuzzaDem.com
|
|
|
 |
|
Sunday, April 18, 2004
Who's Quoting Who?
Pop quiz: Who recently said the following?
"This war makes millions of dollars for big corporations, either weapons manufacturers or those working in the reconstruction [of Iraq], such as Halliburton and its sister companies...
"It is crystal clear who benefits from igniting the fire of this war and this bloodshed: They are the merchants of war, the bloodsuckers who run the policy of the world from behind the scenes.
"President Bush and his ilk, the media giants... all are a fatal danger to the world..."
Was it a) Osama bin Laden, b) John Kerry, c) a MoveOn.org ad, d) Robert Byrd or e) Ted Kennedy?
The answer, of course, is a) Osama bin Laden. But why was it so hard to choose, if you didn't already know the answer? Has anyone noticed that America's worst enemies and leading Democrats are starting to sound alike? Last week Ted Kennedy, Bobby Byrd and Moqtada al-Sadr all used the same troop-demoralising line about Iraq being Vietnam to attack President Bush. Can you imagine the Republicans quoting Emperor Hirohito or Adolf Hitler during the 1944 election campaign? Perhaps they could have quoted Prime Minister Tojo, when he said in 1942, "America that is suffering repeated defeats is trying to cover its mortal blow by relying on vicious propaganda and is in a desperate condition trying to cover the rising criticism within the country and to preserve the right of neutral countries." Would attacking the President using the enemy's words have won over the American people in 1944? Would telling US troops that they were fighting a war for immoral reasons, that they were bound to fail, and that their commander-in-chief was a terrible person have won the election?
Certainly not then, and I hope it doesn't now.
Posted at Sunday, April 18, 2004 by CavalierX
 |  |  | alan April 18, 2004 09:47 AM PDT
Bin laden sounding desperate, also failed with his attempt to split us and europe
Try this site out it has an update on the photo seems it is likely to be a fake, although did suspect it from the start
http://www.gravett.org/Israellycool/
alan |  |
  |  |  | JM April 18, 2004 10:18 AM PDT
Yes, Alan, the photo was a fake by the pro-terrorist anti-American group CAIR.
http://www.imagedump.com/index.cgi?pick=get&tp=59682&user=all3 |  |
  |  |  | StarkTruth April 19, 2004 09:00 AM PDT
What I love about John Kerry is he says in one breathe "The President does not have a plan for the war in Iraq" then turns around in the very next breathe and says "I am not sure what my plan would be but I would surely have the UN involved" |  |
  |  |  | JM April 19, 2004 09:07 AM PDT
He wants to turn Iraq over to the UN, which has done such a wonderful job in Bosnia that after five years of UN ineptitude, the people want their brutal dictator back! |  |
  |  |  | Jamie from Ala April 20, 2004 04:24 PM PDT
John Kerry can't seem to make up his mind just what he does or doesn't support. Last week he was saying Iraq was a failure, yet this week he is saying that it "isn't quite a failure". Is it a failure or isn't it?
Did anyone see Kerry's interview on "Meet the Press"? Did he directly answer any of Russert's questions? There is a little bit about the interview in "Best of the Web" for Monday, April 19th out there on OpinonJournal.com. |  |
  |  |  | JM April 20, 2004 04:28 PM PDT
Kerry is killing his own campaign. And Jamie, I believe you were my 10,000th visitor. Thanks. |  |
  |  |  | Jamie from Ala April 20, 2004 04:34 PM PDT
You are very welcome. |  |
  |  |  | Mark Adams April 21, 2004 02:11 AM PDT
I hate to break up the mutual admiration society, but did any of you Kerry/UN bashers happen to notice that the President said in his press conference that he would be turning over Iraqi sovereignty to whomever UN representative Brahimi said he should. We need the UN now, will in the future, and Bush could have been more diplomatic with the diplomats there in the past. |  |
  |  |  | JM April 21, 2004 04:15 AM PDT
The UN is good at organisation and humanitarian aid. They're terrible at just about everything else. Bush is right to let them run the things they're good at, while NOT letting them ruin Iraq, which Kerry would do. We don't need another Kosovo; one is bad enough. |  |
  |  |  | Jamie G. April 21, 2004 11:29 AM PDT
You may think we are bashing Kerry, but everything said here is true - he flips and flops on just about everything without anything changing in between. Bush did not want the U.N. involved in the enforcement of the U.N.s own resolutions. The U.N. did not have a place in making military decisions in re to the regime change in Iraq because they allowed SH to remain in power for years and merely issued new resolutions after SH failed to comply with the umpteen earlier resolutions. Now that SH has been removed from power, there is a place for the U.N. to help -with the elections, humanitarian aid, etc. Point made - Bush changes as the situation changes. Kerry changes as the POLL NUMBERS change. |  |
  |  |  | Mark Adams April 21, 2004 11:51 PM PDT
Jamie, I was going to leave this alone, but I honestly see Bush only changing his course on so many things only reluctantly, almost a pattern. eg: His tax cuts, he promised them because he sold the idea that we should have our money back when there was a surplus. he didn't change his tax cut policy, just the reason for it after the recession hit. Whether you agree with the policy or not, he wouldn't even consider a modification to the cuts to pay for the $87 million. Steadfast if you are with the idea. Stubborn if not.
Only giving an hour to the 9/11 commission now changed to answering all the questions only after getting flak from his own party faithful. Troop strength increase, only after the worst month yet in Iraq, long after "mission accomplished." Turning over sovereignty to whomever the UN decides, but not moving that artifical deadline, because the caucus plan fell apart and so is the chance for elections anytime soon in the current climate. Naturally Kerry looks like a waffle in comparison.
The UN is the last resort here and only being turned to because POTUS must. There is nothing else.
Of course the UN is an incompetent agency for making war. It was designed to prevent it. Hans Blix did not want to go down in history as the man who said, "Yep (or maybe 'ja'), fuggettaboutit, bomb the lying bastard. Saddam's got VX somewhere, but he hid it, he must have." UN diplomats didn't sign up to make war, but to give us hope for peace.
If anyone left SH in power it was us. It was Clinton. It was Blair. 9/11 changed a lot. Up til then, with only a suspicion of the corruption in the food for oil debacle, and SH's only danger seeming to be the occasional pot shot at an F-15, which promptly blew the AA site to hell, the American people would never have supported them in a costly invasion or grand scheme to reform the entire region. Especially in the wag the dog climate after zippergate.
It was us, all of us, not just or because of the UN. |  |
|
|
|