Click to bookmark this page!

- Contact Me -
Include your email address

<< May 2004 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01
02 03 04 05 06 07 08
09 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31


Just in case you weren't sure...
If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:

Please sign the Ted Kennedy Resignation Petition!


rss feed

Shameless Self-Promotion

Buy this book (not just because it contains two of my op-eds):
Americans on Politics, Policy, and Pop Culture:
The 101 Best Opinion Editorials From OpEds.com


An Interview With the G-Man:
My first (hopefully not last) experience in live radio, being interviewed by G. Gordon Liddy!



Perspective
Joe Mariani

Number of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships by precision use of American military force under George W. Bush:
50 million in just two years

Number of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships by anti-American Bush-bashing terrorist-appeasing whining elitists:
Zero. Ever.
...

The problem seems to me to be the definition of "free speech". Liberals define it as anything they want to say or do that opposes America. I say "speech" ends where "action" begins. Once you pick up a gun for the enemy, throw a rock at a cop during a "peace" march, send money to a terrorist organisation, or travel to Baghdad to block an American JDAM with your ass, you have crossed the line from free speech to costly action.
...

Saying the War on Terror is all about al-Qaeda is like saying we should have fought the Japanese Naval Air Force after Pearl Harbor. Not the Japanese Navy, not the Japanese Army, not the Empire of Japan -- just the Naval Air Force.
...

Complaining about the "waste" when human embryos are destroyed instead of being used in medical experiments is a lot like going to a funeral and complaining about the waste of perfectly good meat.
...

Blaming CO2 for climate change is like blaming smoke for the fire. CO2 is largely a following, not a leading, indicator of a rise in temperature.
...

Cavalier's First Theorem:
Every time, Liberals will fight to protect the guilty and kill the innocent, while Conservatives will fight to protect the innocent and punish the guilty.

Cavalier's Second Theorem:
Liberals are just Socialists who want to be loved... then again, Socialists are just Communists who lack the courage of their convictions.

Cavalier's Third Theorem:
Any strongly moral, hawkish or pro-American statement by a Liberal will inevitably be followed by a "but."

Top News Headlines

Iraq Blogs

The Messopotamian
Iraq at a Glance
Iraq the Model
Hammorabi
Iraq & Iraqis
Nabil's Blog
Road of a Nation
The Sun of Iraq
Healing Iraq

Iraqi Bloggers Central

The Truth About Iraq
Liberating Iraq
Pictures from Iraq
The Iraqi Holocaust: a collection
Iraq's Mass Graves

Mudville Gazette:
News the media can't use

The Other Iraq:
The Iraq you never hear about in the MSM

Michael Yon - Online Magazine
Dispatches not filed from the Baghdad Hilton hot tub


United States Central Command


Humor

Infamous Monsters of Filmland

Day by Day: Chris Muir's witty comic strip with a political bent

The Ultimate War Simulation: Why does this scenario seem so familiar?

What Kind of Liberal Are You?
Save me the trouble of figuring out what kind of idiot you are

Blame Bush
Because Bush is to blame... for everything

Sacred Cow Burgers
Web Archive

Satirical Political Beliefs Test

Communists for Kerry

Cooper's Protester Guide

Fellowship 9/11: Sauron never attacked Rohan, Saruman did! Yet a small group of elitists convinced Middle-earth to divert resources from the real war to attack Mordor for personal gain.


Analysis

When Democrats Attack
Did prominent Democrats switch positions on Iraq just to attack President Bush for political gain? (See the updated list.)

Was Iraqi Freedom Justified?
An honest, step-by-step analysis of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq that Congress voted into law shows that it was.

Saddam's Philanthropy of Terror
Details of solid ties to organised international terrorism

How The Left Betrayed Iraq
by Naseer Flayih Hasan

Did We Botch The Occupation?
No, not of Iraq: of Germany. Read the media's take on how we "lost the peace" in 1946 and compare.

Debunking 8 Anti-War Myths About the Conflict in Iraq

Pictures from Hate Bush/Hate America/Hate Capitalism/Hate Israel/general wacko rallies
- by Zombie

Jihad Watch


2004 Election Links

Looosers: Sorry, Everybody!
Winners: You're Welcome, Everybody!


2008 Election

Peace Through Strength PAC


Duncan Hunter in 2008
official site



Click to join duncanhunterforpresident2008 at Yahoo! Groups

Useful Links

FamilyWishList
Share your wish list with friends and family

Virtual Tourist
Travel tips from real travelers

RemBot.com
Appointment calendar with email/wireless notification

PriceGrabber.com
Convenient comparison shopping


Reading Material

RightWingNews
The best right-wing news and commentary

GOP USA Commentary Corner

Men's News Daily
The New Media

OpinionEditorials.com
a project of Frontiers of Freedom

ChronWatch
SF Chronicle watchdog and conservative news

American Daily
Analysis with political and social commentary

The Conservative Voice
Conservative news and opinion

News By Us
...not news bias

IntellectualConservative.com
Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics

CommonConservative.com
Practical conservatism for the common man

USASentinel
Analysis, Commentary and Opinion on the Real World

PhillyFuture.org
Philly news and blogs


Now Reading

The Fatal Conceit:
The Errors of Socialism
by F. A. Hayek



Articles Previously Published at
Useless-Knowledge.com

- When Good Liberals Go Bad - 05/29/03
- How Stupid Do Democrats Think You Are? - 05/31/03
- Who Are These 'Rich' Getting Tax Cuts, Anyway? - 06/02/03
- How Can We Miss The Clintons If They Won't Go Away? - 06/04/03
- Whining of Mass Distraction: How To Discredit A President - 06/05/03
- Liberal "Rules" for Arguing - 06/10/03
- Liberalism: Curable or Terminal? - 06/14/03
- Filibustering Judges: Hijacking Presidential Powers? - 06/17/03
- Is Hamas Exempt from the War on Terror? - 06/22/03
- How Malleable Is The Constitution? - 06/26/03
- Rejecting Our Biological and Cultural Heritage - 06/30/03
- I Need Liberal Assistance, Now! - 07/02/03
- Bring Them On - 07/03/03
- We Need You Arrogant Warmongering Americans...Again - 07/09/03
- Much Ado About Nothing, Again - 07/13/03
- Double Standard: Blindly Blame Bush - 07/18/03
- Was WWII Also Unjustified? - 07/20/03
- Clinton Backing Bush? Don't Bet On It! - 07/24/03
- How To Be A Hypocritical Liberal - 07/28/03
- The Clinton Legacy: In Answer to Mr. Stensrud - 07/30/03
-What Is 'Good News' To Liberals? - 08/02/03
- Bush's Big Blunder - 08/06/03
- The Meaning of Right - Why I Supported the Iraq War - 08/10/03
- More Liberal "Rules" for Arguing - 08/14/03
- You Can Have Cary Grant; I'll Take John Wayne! - 08/19/03
- Where Is The ACLU When It's Actually Needed? - 08/25/03
- Who's Afraid Of The Big Bad Ten Commandments? - 08/28/03
- From The Weasels: Thanks For Nothing - 08/30/03
- The Liberal Superfriends - 09/02/03
- Liberal Superfriends 2: The Sequel - 09/05/03
- Saddam and 9/11: Connect the Dots - 09/08/03
- Throwing Away the Southern Vote - 11/02/03
- Libya: The First Domino Falls - 12/20/03
- Is the UN Playing Games with American Politics? - 03/04/04


Blogs to Browse

Across the Pond
AlphaPatriot
Arts for Democracy
Betsy's Page
Bill Karl
Blonde Sagacity
Bull Moose Strikes Back
Common Sense & Wonder
Conservative Pleasure
Dangerous Logic
DowneastBlog
ElectionProjection
Everything I Know Is Wrong
Freedom of Thought
Sally Girl
Korla Pundit
LogiPundit.com
MarkLevinFan
Mark Nicodemo
Michelle Malkin
Moonbattery
My Arse From My Elbow
QandO Blog
RadioBS.net
Rebel Rouser
RightThinkingGirl
Sally Girl
Samantha Burns
Semi-Intelligent Thoughts
Sighed Effects
Sister Toldjah
Stark Truth
Take A Stand Against Liberals
The Resplendent Mango
The Right Society
The YNC
Tom's Common Sense
Tom DeLay
Tomfoolery of the Highest Order
Trying to Grok
TS Right Dominion
Violent Daydreams
Watcher of Weasels
Word Around the Net
WuzzaDem.com



Locations of visitors to this page


Thursday, May 13, 2004
Treason or Not? The Case Against Ted Kennedy

At some point, we will have to muster the courage to face the facts about Senator Edward "Ted" Kennedy (D-Ma). Since the decision to remove Saddam Hussein from power was made, his criticisms of the President have become more shrill and accusatory. For the most part, that's fine -- the First Amendment protects the right to freedom of speech that we all have, within certain limits. (For instance, one cannot yell "Fire!" in a crowded building if there isn't one.) However, Ted Kennedy may have crossed those limits in his excessively vitriolic attacks on the President and his decision to liberate Iraq from Saddam Hussein.

President Bush, having been granted the Authorization for Use of Military Force in Iraq by Congress, decided to use that authorised force to remove Saddam Hussein from power. Whether the liberation of Iraq was justified as part of the War on Terror became merely an argument for historians at that point, in a certain respect. The fact is that the United States was and remains at war, like it or not.

Though our Taliban enemies and Saddam Hussein were swiftly defeated, the larger war against terrorism and the States that support it has not ended. At the moment, it is concentrated in that same Iraq that was once a prime supporter of terrorists under Saddam, including the open payment of $25,000 to the family of at least one Hamas suicide bomber, and $10,000 to other Palestinian militants. Our enemies now are the terrorists that have poured into Iraq to prevent that country from becoming an open and democratic nation. Such an event would begin the destruction of terrorism as the only way for -- from their point of view -- disaffected and disenfranchised Muslims to make their voices heard.

Many Middle Eastern countries are repressive Islamo-fascist dictatorships, if not outright theocracies. Whether the rulers are minority Sunni subjugating a majority Shi'ite population, a self-perpetuating religious oligarchy controlling a restless population through fear, or a single extended family ruling just about everyone else, the pressure is only relieved by channeling it into anti-Western rage. The most restive and angry -- and brainwashed -- people are the most likely to become recruits for terrorism. Repressive dictatorships must have an escape valve, or the pressure of their own restive populations would cause them to explode.

We do have enemies, and our enemies have chosen this war. The terrorists have declared that we are their enemy. Whether we like it or not, whether we agree on how we got there or not, we are at war with them in Iraq now. The recent horrific beheading of Nick Berg shows us exactly what kind of people those enemies are, and what they want. We must rid the Middle East of these terrorists -- that's what the War on Terror is all about. And Ted Kennedy has repeatedly given aid and comfort to the enemy in various ways in the course of this war.

He has sought to undermine the credibility of the commander-in-chief by accusing him of manufacturing the case for war in Iraq for his own personal and political ends. "This was made up in Texas, announced in January [2003] to the Republican leadership that war was going to take place and was going to be good politically. This whole thing was a fraud," Kennedy said in September 2003. The resolution authorising the war became law by Congressional vote in October 2002, three months earlier. In October 2003 Kennedy said, "The trumped up reasons for going to war have collapsed," and "the President's war has been revealed as mindless, needless, senseless, and reckless." These accusations can only have a detrimental effect on the morale of our armed forces fighting "the President's war," and on American credibility in the world.

He has sought to decrease the effectiveness of America's ability to prosecute war by demanding that Bush fire Donald Rumsfeld in the middle of a war. "I think we need a new beginning," Kennedy said after Rumsfeld's testimony before the Senate regarding the mistreatment of some prisoners in Iraq. By all accounts the abuse seems to have been performed by guards exceeding their orders, on their own initiative. When the abuse was reported, it was immediately investigated. The report from Major General Taguba found, as he told the Senate, that there were no actual orders given to the guards or policy set to mistreat the prisoners, though it was "suggested" by General Geoffrey Miller that they set the "conditions for the successful exploitation of internees." There is no evidence whatsoever that Rumsfeld had anything to do with it, yet this situation is being used to demand his replacement. Removing the Secretary of Defense on such a flimsy pretext in the middle of an ongoing conflict would cause a serious disruption of our military's coherence and efficacy.

He has sought to damage the morale of US troops in the field of combat by comparing them to Saddam Hussein's torture squads, speaking of the same prisoner mistreatment. "On March 19, 2004, President Bush asked, 'Who would prefer that Saddam's torture chambers still be open?'" said Kennedy. "Shamefully, we now learn that Saddam's torture chambers reopened under new management: U.S. management." Saddam Hussein's torture methodology included eye gouging, the piercing of hands with an electric drill, suspension until ligaments were torn, acid baths and feeding the victim feet-first into a plastic shredder. It is infamous and outrageous when our enemies compare the US military to Saddam's State-sanctioned torturers. How much more so when a sitting US Senator does it?

Title 18, Part I, Chapter 115, Section 2381 of the United States Legal Code defines "treason" in the following way: "Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason." Senator Kennedy's accusations have given comfort to our enemies, who must surely think that they can force us to back down from them when they hear his vitriolic attacks. His words have aided the enemy by sapping the morale of American troops facing them in Iraq and Afghanistan.

For the successful prosecution of the fight against terrorism, our enemies must see that while we may argue amongst ourselves, we are united against them. For the good of the country, Senator Kennedy must step down from the Senate.

UPDATE: Please sign the online petition to request Senator Kennedy's resignation.

Posted at Thursday, May 13, 2004 by CavalierX

d_Brit
May 13, 2004   11:52 PM PDT
 
technically, it borders on treason.

Practically speaking, treason is too great a charge.

That is because probably 20% of the american public agrees and speaks that and worse.

20% of 350M people is 70M people, will we charge them all with treason? Make an example out of kennedy?

That would tear the country apart and you know it.

What can be done? Ostracism and censure is the appropriate response. Verbal confrontation in the Senate is another.

Any other extra legal means of censure...
JM
May 14, 2004   05:09 AM PDT
 
That's why I say Kennedy should step down. As for 20% of the public, they're not prominent members of the Senate. Kennedy's position carrries with it certain responsibilities, including that of not trying to tear the country apart. He doesnt seem to realise that one can dissent and question without these accusations of wrongdoing, which only give our enemies hope.
Jamie
May 14, 2004   10:05 AM PDT
 
One obvious indication that Kennedy should be censored is that the ME news carriers use Kennedy's (and those others like him, Byrd, Clinton and even Kerry) words to back up their own skewed reporting.

Article on Weekly Standard about Kennedy. http://tinyurl.com/yuh3a
JM
May 14, 2004   10:08 AM PDT
 
Precisely... Kennedy is giving the enemy ammunition to use against us. How much worse does it have to get before he's at least censured??
Jamie
May 14, 2004   01:12 PM PDT
 
You would think that there would be some "self-censure" by the members of Congress, especially since they are representatives of "the people" who elected them. But, people like Kennedy and Bryd don't care if the use of vitriolic diaglog to trash the reputation of the entire U.S. military results in more deaths in Iraq. Probably because very few military people voted for them.
Lea
May 14, 2004   04:39 PM PDT
 
Are you British? I notice you use the British spelling on certain words.

Just wondering.

I agree wholeheartedly, but don't hold your breath waiting for anyone to censure Ted Kennedy or "KKK" Byrd.

JM
May 14, 2004   04:47 PM PDT
 
No, but too many of my teachers were. :) Never got out of the habits I learned from them.
d_Brit
May 14, 2004   08:19 PM PDT
 
kennedy et al would have to go a LOT further before the senate would hold censure.

They ARE representing the people who support them! we just have contempt for those people. Unfortunately there are a LOT of them...
Mike H.
May 14, 2004   11:45 PM PDT
 
What if he violates his Oath of Office?
http://www.senate.gov/reference/reference_index_subjects/Oath_vrd.htm
Christopher Taylor
May 15, 2004   11:34 AM PDT
 
The more Kennedy makes stupid, loud noises, the more it hurts the Democrats. So let him keep shouting treasonous nonsense.
The Sicilian
May 15, 2004   01:34 PM PDT
 
He definetely should be asked to step down. Further measures should be taken to ensure he is never allowed to speak in public again. That may be harsh, but he's lucky he's been allowed to go this far.
JM
May 15, 2004   01:38 PM PDT
 
Well, everyone has the right to free speech. Those who abuse that right in irresponsible ways like Kennedy should not be holding public office. And when his comments cause harm as they have done, he should be held accountable for them.
Larry
May 16, 2004   12:08 AM PDT
 
Kennedy's a clever politician. His job for the next few months will be to draw Howard Dean's lunatic, moonbat followers over to Kerry. He'll do that by periodically making idiotic, borderline-treasonous statements, to which Kerry will neither condemn or condone. It'll get even worse closer to November - He might even pop out a couple "allahu ackbar"s before he's through.
Allahu akbar
May 16, 2004   08:39 AM PDT
 
Ho, Ho, Ho Chi Minh
John F. Kerry's gonna win
JM
May 16, 2004   09:18 AM PDT
 
Thanks for the proof that all Kerry's got is some old slogans from Vietnam.
Rob Lawson
May 18, 2004   06:08 AM PDT
 
"Ho, Ho, Ho Chi Minh
John F. Kerry's gonna win"

That's some enlightening stuff right there. Did you make that up yourself or is that the chant echoed in various al-Qaeda/HAMAS/PLO/PLF camps these days? Interesting moniker you have there, too.

And I signed the petition. You know what would stink, though? If Ted Kennedy takes your petition out on a date and runs it over, then dumps its ASCII body in a river or something.

Keep an eye out!
Rob Lawson
May 18, 2004   06:48 AM PDT
 
Just so you know, I made a post in my blog AND The Right Society which gives details (and a link) to your petition.

http://weblogs.therightsociety.com/
JM
May 18, 2004   08:28 AM PDT
 
Fantastic... thanks! Have you read some of the comments on that petition, especially the comemnts from angry Democrats? Wow!
The Sicilian
May 20, 2004   10:32 PM PDT
 
Woohoo...signature 391!!
Laura
May 22, 2004   07:55 PM PDT
 
If Kennedy were a Republican (heaven forbid) he would have been driven out of office before now just like Newt Gingrich and Trent Lott.

LC
militant sandpiper
December 3, 2004   06:23 PM PST
 
Ted kennedy got away with murder(chapaquedic)and he is running this nation ino the ground for his own purposes its time to IMPEACH TED KENNEDY and get him out of the political spotlight for good
mgisalive
January 17, 2005   10:21 AM PST
 
I wholly agree Ted Kennedy should be impeached for his anti-american rhetoric. As someone else stated, if he were a republican, he would already be gone! He is fueling the terrorists hopes and motivating them, that they may have a chance to win the war. We as Americans need to support or Government and be behind the President with our support. Who IS Ted Kennedy?? the brother of a president? son of a rum-runner? cheater in college - UVa. a nobody! who has abig mouth and ego. I think he should leave politics and I support efforts to have the sucess on his leaving.
Jenn
January 25, 2005   03:32 PM PST
 
I would love to see him impeached. My question is how can the rest of this country succeed in kicking his fat drunk a$$ out of the Senate when his own state won't even vote him out. What scares me more is that his son, Patrick "I've never worked a day in my life" Kennedy seems poised to carry on daddy's anti-American legacy.
taylor
January 27, 2005   02:07 PM PST
 
Enough is enough! The man is speaking treason daily, giving aid and comfort to our enemies. We need to get him out of the Senate
 

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments




Previous Entry Home Next Entry