 Click to bookmark this page!
- Contact Me - Include your email address
 Just in case you weren't sure...
Please sign the Ted Kennedy Resignation Petition!
Shameless Self-PromotionBuy this book (not just because it contains two of my op-eds):
Americans on Politics, Policy, and Pop Culture: The 101 Best Opinion Editorials From OpEds.com

An Interview With the G-Man:
My first (hopefully not last) experience in live radio, being interviewed by G. Gordon Liddy!
Perspective Joe
MarianiNumber
of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships
by precision use of American military force
under George W. Bush: 50
million in just two years
Number
of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships
by anti-American Bush-bashing
terrorist-appeasing whining elitists: Zero. Ever.
...The problem seems to
me to be the definition of "free speech".
Liberals define it as anything they want to say
or do that opposes America. I say "speech" ends
where "action" begins. Once you pick up a gun
for the enemy, throw a rock at a cop during a
"peace" march, send money to a terrorist
organisation, or travel to Baghdad to block an
American JDAM with your ass, you have crossed the line from free speech to costly action. ...
Saying the War on Terror is all about al-Qaeda is like saying we should have fought the Japanese Naval Air Force after Pearl Harbor. Not the Japanese Navy, not the Japanese Army, not the Empire of Japan -- just the Naval Air Force. ...Complaining about the "waste" when human embryos are destroyed instead of being used in medical experiments is a lot like going to a funeral and complaining about the waste of perfectly good meat. ...Blaming CO2 for climate change is like blaming smoke for the fire. CO2 is largely a following, not a leading, indicator of a rise in temperature. ...
Cavalier's First Theorem: Every time, Liberals will fight to protect the guilty and kill the innocent, while Conservatives will fight to protect the innocent and punish the guilty.
Cavalier's Second Theorem: Liberals are just Socialists who want to be loved... then again, Socialists are just Communists who lack the courage of their convictions.
Cavalier's Third Theorem: Any strongly moral, hawkish or pro-American statement by a Liberal will inevitably be followed by a "but."
Top News Headlines
Iraq
Blogs
The Messopotamian Iraq at a Glance Iraq the Model
Hammorabi Iraq & Iraqis Nabil's Blog Road of a Nation The Sun of Iraq
Healing Iraq
Iraqi Bloggers Central
The Truth About Iraq Liberating Iraq
Pictures from Iraq The Iraqi Holocaust: a collection
Iraq's Mass Graves
Mudville Gazette: News the media can't use
The Other Iraq: The Iraq you never hear about in the MSM
Michael Yon - Online Magazine Dispatches not filed from the Baghdad Hilton hot tub
 United States Central Command
Humor
Infamous Monsters of Filmland
Day by Day:
Chris Muir's witty comic strip with a political
bent
The Ultimate War Simulation: Why does this scenario seem so familiar?
What Kind of Liberal Are You? Save me the trouble
of figuring out what kind of idiot you
are
Blame
Bush Because Bush is to blame... for
everything
Sacred Cow Burgers Web Archive
Satirical Political Beliefs
Test
Communists for Kerry
Cooper's Protester Guide
Fellowship 9/11: Sauron never attacked Rohan, Saruman did! Yet a small group of elitists convinced Middle-earth to divert resources from the real war to attack Mordor for personal gain.
Analysis
When Democrats Attack Did prominent Democrats switch positions on Iraq just to attack President Bush for political gain? (See the updated list.)
Was Iraqi Freedom Justified? An honest, step-by-step analysis of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq that Congress voted into law shows that it was.
Saddam's Philanthropy of Terror Details of solid ties to organised international terrorism
How The Left Betrayed Iraq by Naseer Flayih Hasan
Did We Botch The
Occupation? No, not of Iraq: of Germany. Read the
media's take on how we "lost the peace" in 1946
and compare.
Debunking 8 Anti-War Myths About the Conflict in Iraq
Pictures from Hate
Bush/Hate America/Hate Capitalism/Hate
Israel/general wacko rallies - by
Zombie
Jihad Watch
2004 Election Links
Looosers: Sorry, Everybody!
Winners: You're Welcome, Everybody!
2008 ElectionPeace Through Strength PAC Duncan Hunter in 2008 official site
Click to join duncanhunterforpresident2008 at Yahoo! Groups
Useful Links
FamilyWishList Share your wish list with friends and family
Virtual Tourist Travel tips from real travelers
RemBot.com Appointment calendar with email/wireless notification
PriceGrabber.com Convenient comparison shopping
Reading
MaterialRightWingNews
The best right-wing news and commentary
GOP USA Commentary
Corner
Men's News Daily The New Media
OpinionEditorials.com a project of Frontiers of Freedom
ChronWatch SF Chronicle watchdog and conservative news
American Daily Analysis with political and social commentary
The Conservative Voice Conservative news and opinion
News By Us ...not news bias
IntellectualConservative.com Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics
CommonConservative.com Practical conservatism for the common man
USASentinel Analysis, Commentary and Opinion on the Real World
PhillyFuture.org Philly news and blogs
Now ReadingThe Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism by F. A. Hayek

Articles Previously Published at
Useless-Knowledge.com
- When Good Liberals Go
Bad - 05/29/03 - How Stupid Do Democrats Think You
Are? - 05/31/03 - Who Are These 'Rich' Getting Tax
Cuts, Anyway? - 06/02/03 - How Can We Miss The Clintons If
They Won't Go Away? - 06/04/03 -
Whining of Mass Distraction: How
To Discredit A President -
06/05/03 - Liberal "Rules" for Arguing
- 06/10/03 - Liberalism: Curable or
Terminal? - 06/14/03 - Filibustering Judges: Hijacking
Presidential Powers? - 06/17/03 -
Is Hamas Exempt from the War on
Terror? - 06/22/03 - How Malleable Is The
Constitution? - 06/26/03 - Rejecting Our Biological and
Cultural Heritage - 06/30/03 - I Need Liberal Assistance,
Now! - 07/02/03 - Bring Them On -
07/03/03 - We Need You Arrogant Warmongering
Americans...Again - 07/09/03 - Much Ado About Nothing, Again
- 07/13/03 - Double Standard: Blindly Blame
Bush - 07/18/03 - Was WWII Also Unjustified?
- 07/20/03 - Clinton Backing Bush? Don't Bet On
It! - 07/24/03 - How To Be A Hypocritical
Liberal - 07/28/03 - The Clinton Legacy: In Answer to
Mr. Stensrud - 07/30/03 -What Is 'Good News' To
Liberals? - 08/02/03 - Bush's Big Blunder -
08/06/03 - The Meaning of Right - Why I
Supported the Iraq War -
08/10/03 - More Liberal "Rules" for
Arguing - 08/14/03 - You Can Have Cary Grant; I'll Take
John Wayne! - 08/19/03 - Where Is The ACLU When It's
Actually Needed? - 08/25/03 - Who's Afraid Of The Big Bad Ten
Commandments? - 08/28/03 - From The Weasels: Thanks For
Nothing - 08/30/03 - The Liberal
Superfriends - 09/02/03 - Liberal Superfriends 2: The
Sequel - 09/05/03 - Saddam and 9/11: Connect the
Dots - 09/08/03 - Throwing Away the Southern
Vote - 11/02/03 - Libya: The First Domino
Falls - 12/20/03 - Is the UN Playing Games with
American Politics? - 03/04/04
Blogs to Browse
Across the Pond
AlphaPatriot
Arts for Democracy
Betsy's Page
Bill Karl
Blonde Sagacity
Bull Moose Strikes Back
Common Sense & Wonder
Conservative Pleasure
Dangerous Logic
DowneastBlog
ElectionProjection
Everything I Know Is Wrong
Freedom of Thought
Sally Girl
Korla Pundit
LogiPundit.com
MarkLevinFan
Mark Nicodemo
Michelle Malkin
Moonbattery
My Arse From My Elbow
QandO Blog
RadioBS.net
Rebel Rouser
RightThinkingGirl
Sally Girl
Samantha Burns
Semi-Intelligent Thoughts
Sighed Effects
Sister Toldjah
Stark Truth
Take A Stand Against Liberals
The Resplendent Mango
The Right Society
The YNC
Tom's Common Sense
Tom DeLay
Tomfoolery of the Highest Order
Trying to Grok
TS Right Dominion
Violent Daydreams
Watcher of Weasels
Word Around the Net
WuzzaDem.com
|
|
|
 |
|
Friday, August 13, 2004
Ten Suggestions for a Sensitive War on Terror
Ten Suggestions for a Sensitive War on Terror
Presidential hopeful John Kerry has been telling the American people that he would fight a "better" war against terror, but not exactly how. At the UNITY 2004 conference for minority journalists, Kerry stated, "I believe I can fight a more effective, more thoughtful, more strategic, more proactive, more sensitive war on terror that reaches out to other nations and brings them to our side and lives up to American values in history." (This was the same conference, by the way, at which the neutral, non-partisan journalists broke out in wild cheers and whistling for Kerry, but heckled Bush as he spoke the very next day. But remember, folks, there's no media bias!)
I wondered just how one would fight a "sensitive" war against the kind of subhuman slime who cut the heads off innocent victims on videotape. Kerry has offered few specifics on his plan for fighting terror, aside from forming a "real coalition" of nations (a massive slight on the British, Italians, Poles, Australians, Japanese, Spanish, and dozens of others who have been with us in both Afghanistan and Iraq, if you ask me). He has said he sees fighting terrorism as "primarily an intelligence and law enforcement operation." On his web site, Kerry's plan for making America safer consists mainly of tracking terrorists once they arrive, "hardening targets," and making sure first responders have what they need to clean up the carnage after the terrorists strike. Apparently, the lack of mess is supposed to discourage them. Nothing about preventing them from coming here in the first place, of course... nothing about letting them know it's not going to be worth the price. Nothing about stopping the nations which support them from doing so, by either diplomatic or military pressure. That sort of thing just isn't done, it seems.
In any case, it looks as though John Kerry needs help coming up with specific ways in which he can fight a more thoughtful and sensitive war on terror. In the spirit of cooperation, I'd like to suggest the following helpful list...
10. Stop calling it a "war." Rename it to the "Protest Against Terror." Protests always get people's attention and let them know that what you're protesting against is wrong.
9. Use softer bullets. Metal bullets hurt the terrorists, and that makes them hate us more.
8. Perhaps President Kerry can invite Osama bin Laden to the White House for a "cuddling party" with Kerry/Edwards. Nothing makes friends faster than a good cuddle.
7. Only go to war if the French and the UN say it's okay. Everyone knows how skillful the French are at dealing with other nations, and the UN has proven time and again its efficacy in dealing with terrorists.
6. Pull the troops out of Iraq within six months, but stay the course and even send more troops. If you have to ask, it's too nuanced for you.
5. Gently but firmly remind the terrorists that he was in Vietnam for four months thirty-five years ago. They won't dare pull anything then.
4. Ensure government owned and operated health care for all Americans, paid for with higher taxes. Terrorists won't bother to attack if they know all Americans have health care; it won't do any good then.
3. Stop eating pork and cover the women. Don't let them read or vote. That will show the terrorists that we understand them and appreciate their culture.
2. Don't call them "terrorists." They feel bad enough about our bullying, abusive foreign policy as it is. Call them "armed peace demonstrators." They'll feel more... peaceful.
1. Don't send soldiers; send social workers. All they really need is love and understanding.
"Armed" with these suggestions, I'm sure John Kerry will be able to convince the terrorists to stop hating us in no time, should he win November's election. As for me... I'll be in the mountains building a bunker.
Posted at Friday, August 13, 2004 by CavalierX
 |  |  | Anony-mouse August 13, 2004 03:57 PM PDT
That is, AFTER you pay for my movie ticket on the Friday following the election! After that, feel free to barricade yourself in anywhere you darn well please. :-) |  |
  |  |  | JM August 13, 2004 04:53 PM PDT
I almost hope they raise the prices the weekend after Bush's re-lection, just to make my victory the sweeter. |  |
  |  |  | Anony-mouse August 13, 2004 04:56 PM PDT
If they raise the prices any higher, I'll treat you to a DVD instead. :-P |  |
  |  |  | JM August 13, 2004 05:06 PM PDT
That's ok... you would probably slip "Fakerenheit 9/11" in there. |  |
  |  |  | Zee (Sister Toldjah) August 14, 2004 10:43 PM PDT
Oh goodness! Thanks for the chuckle .. that was great! |  |
  |  |  | Auzerais August 16, 2004 12:50 PM PDT
You obviously omitted THE most "Sensitive" move that Kerry would surely make in the War on Terror.
That is, after having conspired with the French and Kofi Annan, to give alQaeda a newly created permanent "Islamic Seat" at the UN.
After all, precedent has already been set with the Terrorist PLO and Arafat having their own "observer's seat", along with other terrorist states like Iran and North Korea.
I predict that within a year of (god forbid) Kerry taking office, voices will be raised on campuses (with C*ANSWER leading the way) to force the US off the Security Council and the "Global Islamic Movement" taking our place.
Kerry would only see this as being truly 'sensitive'.
And then, of course, the UN could be 'persuaded' to allow alQaeda to convert Notre Dame Cathedral into a Grand Mosque dedicated to binLaden.... |  |
  |  |  | newt August 17, 2004 09:47 PM PDT
I don't understand all of this, but...you guys have made me laugh more then once!
Also, on #1, would social workers help if these dudes behead innocent peeps, too? I mean, just a question I don't want to start a fight... |  |
  |  |  | woops I F'ed up your pc August 17, 2004 10:17 PM PDT
Since children are our futhure, lets send Michael Jackson to Iraq to talk to the terrorist children in training. I'm sure he could really "grab hold" of the situation. |  |
  |  |  | Harold August 17, 2004 10:28 PM PDT
I read this article by "cavalierx" and it's pure nonsense.
Bushes war in Iraq has been a disaster. Nearly 1,000 dead soldiers with more coming. Bush has no real plan to get us out of this mess and Kerry does.
I always though Democrats were responsible for deficit spending. Yet, with republicans controling the congress in tandom with Bushes economic policies (~ a record $500B deficit in 2004) we will bankrupt our country in no time. Moreover, thousands of good paying jobs are being replaced with low paying crap.
Am I a democrat? NO WAY. Been a hard core republican since 1978. But will I vote for Bush? NO WAY. Bush is by far the worst president in US history and I like many others (read my web link above) have been kicking myself in the butt for voting for him.
I will be voting for Kerry and websites like Cav's will never change my mind.
Wake up fellow republicans! You are being fooled!
Harold G.
Ohio, USA
|  |
  |  |  | JM August 17, 2004 10:46 PM PDT
Liberals crack me up, except when they try to use the deaths of soldiers to attack the President. Then they're simply pathetic, even if they ARE just reading the same tired Michael Moore/Democrat/Communist talking points.
First of all, you may as well call it "Kerry's war," since he voted for it (but voted to leave the troops he sent without adequate body armor). As for calling it a disaster, Iraq and Afghanistan are in far better shape than Germany and Japan a year or two after their surrender. Kosovo is in far worse shape, after five YEARS.
Second, Kerry's plan is to run away from Iraq as fast as he can. Or to send more troops. It varies from day to day. That sort of indecision is fatal.
Third, Democrats plan to spend far more than the Republicans would dare in my worst nightmares.
Fourth, the "low paying job" meme was easily debunked by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the same non-partisan number-crunchers who stated that 629,000 jobs were created in July. You Libs should be HAPPY to hear that small businesses are expanding while large corporations are not. Oh well.
Fifth, your lie about being a Republican is laughable. Did Moby personally tell you to go around telling people you're a republican who changed his mind? Bah.
Sixth and most damning, your link leads to Michael Moore's Web Site O' Lies. That's all anyone ever needs to know about you.
You are dismissed. |  |
  |  |  | JM August 17, 2004 11:06 PM PDT
>I don't understand all of this, but...
Just ask; I'll be glad to explain if I can. By email if you'd rather. |  |
|
|
|