Click to bookmark this page!

- Contact Me -
Include your email address

<< January 2005 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01
02 03 04 05 06 07 08
09 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31


Just in case you weren't sure...
If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:

Please sign the Ted Kennedy Resignation Petition!


rss feed

Shameless Self-Promotion

Buy this book (not just because it contains two of my op-eds):
Americans on Politics, Policy, and Pop Culture:
The 101 Best Opinion Editorials From OpEds.com


An Interview With the G-Man:
My first (hopefully not last) experience in live radio, being interviewed by G. Gordon Liddy!



Perspective
Joe Mariani

Number of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships by precision use of American military force under George W. Bush:
50 million in just two years

Number of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships by anti-American Bush-bashing terrorist-appeasing whining elitists:
Zero. Ever.
...

The problem seems to me to be the definition of "free speech". Liberals define it as anything they want to say or do that opposes America. I say "speech" ends where "action" begins. Once you pick up a gun for the enemy, throw a rock at a cop during a "peace" march, send money to a terrorist organisation, or travel to Baghdad to block an American JDAM with your ass, you have crossed the line from free speech to costly action.
...

Saying the War on Terror is all about al-Qaeda is like saying we should have fought the Japanese Naval Air Force after Pearl Harbor. Not the Japanese Navy, not the Japanese Army, not the Empire of Japan -- just the Naval Air Force.
...

Complaining about the "waste" when human embryos are destroyed instead of being used in medical experiments is a lot like going to a funeral and complaining about the waste of perfectly good meat.
...

Blaming CO2 for climate change is like blaming smoke for the fire. CO2 is largely a following, not a leading, indicator of a rise in temperature.
...

Cavalier's First Theorem:
Every time, Liberals will fight to protect the guilty and kill the innocent, while Conservatives will fight to protect the innocent and punish the guilty.

Cavalier's Second Theorem:
Liberals are just Socialists who want to be loved... then again, Socialists are just Communists who lack the courage of their convictions.

Cavalier's Third Theorem:
Any strongly moral, hawkish or pro-American statement by a Liberal will inevitably be followed by a "but."

Top News Headlines

Iraq Blogs

The Messopotamian
Iraq at a Glance
Iraq the Model
Hammorabi
Iraq & Iraqis
Nabil's Blog
Road of a Nation
The Sun of Iraq
Healing Iraq

Iraqi Bloggers Central

The Truth About Iraq
Liberating Iraq
Pictures from Iraq
The Iraqi Holocaust: a collection
Iraq's Mass Graves

Mudville Gazette:
News the media can't use

The Other Iraq:
The Iraq you never hear about in the MSM

Michael Yon - Online Magazine
Dispatches not filed from the Baghdad Hilton hot tub


United States Central Command


Humor

Infamous Monsters of Filmland

Day by Day: Chris Muir's witty comic strip with a political bent

The Ultimate War Simulation: Why does this scenario seem so familiar?

What Kind of Liberal Are You?
Save me the trouble of figuring out what kind of idiot you are

Blame Bush
Because Bush is to blame... for everything

Sacred Cow Burgers
Web Archive

Satirical Political Beliefs Test

Communists for Kerry

Cooper's Protester Guide

Fellowship 9/11: Sauron never attacked Rohan, Saruman did! Yet a small group of elitists convinced Middle-earth to divert resources from the real war to attack Mordor for personal gain.


Analysis

When Democrats Attack
Did prominent Democrats switch positions on Iraq just to attack President Bush for political gain? (See the updated list.)

Was Iraqi Freedom Justified?
An honest, step-by-step analysis of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq that Congress voted into law shows that it was.

Saddam's Philanthropy of Terror
Details of solid ties to organised international terrorism

How The Left Betrayed Iraq
by Naseer Flayih Hasan

Did We Botch The Occupation?
No, not of Iraq: of Germany. Read the media's take on how we "lost the peace" in 1946 and compare.

Debunking 8 Anti-War Myths About the Conflict in Iraq

Pictures from Hate Bush/Hate America/Hate Capitalism/Hate Israel/general wacko rallies
- by Zombie

Jihad Watch


2004 Election Links

Looosers: Sorry, Everybody!
Winners: You're Welcome, Everybody!


2008 Election

Peace Through Strength PAC


Duncan Hunter in 2008
official site



Click to join duncanhunterforpresident2008 at Yahoo! Groups

Useful Links

FamilyWishList
Share your wish list with friends and family

Virtual Tourist
Travel tips from real travelers

RemBot.com
Appointment calendar with email/wireless notification

PriceGrabber.com
Convenient comparison shopping


Reading Material

RightWingNews
The best right-wing news and commentary

GOP USA Commentary Corner

Men's News Daily
The New Media

OpinionEditorials.com
a project of Frontiers of Freedom

ChronWatch
SF Chronicle watchdog and conservative news

American Daily
Analysis with political and social commentary

The Conservative Voice
Conservative news and opinion

News By Us
...not news bias

IntellectualConservative.com
Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics

CommonConservative.com
Practical conservatism for the common man

USASentinel
Analysis, Commentary and Opinion on the Real World

PhillyFuture.org
Philly news and blogs


Now Reading

The Fatal Conceit:
The Errors of Socialism
by F. A. Hayek



Articles Previously Published at
Useless-Knowledge.com

- When Good Liberals Go Bad - 05/29/03
- How Stupid Do Democrats Think You Are? - 05/31/03
- Who Are These 'Rich' Getting Tax Cuts, Anyway? - 06/02/03
- How Can We Miss The Clintons If They Won't Go Away? - 06/04/03
- Whining of Mass Distraction: How To Discredit A President - 06/05/03
- Liberal "Rules" for Arguing - 06/10/03
- Liberalism: Curable or Terminal? - 06/14/03
- Filibustering Judges: Hijacking Presidential Powers? - 06/17/03
- Is Hamas Exempt from the War on Terror? - 06/22/03
- How Malleable Is The Constitution? - 06/26/03
- Rejecting Our Biological and Cultural Heritage - 06/30/03
- I Need Liberal Assistance, Now! - 07/02/03
- Bring Them On - 07/03/03
- We Need You Arrogant Warmongering Americans...Again - 07/09/03
- Much Ado About Nothing, Again - 07/13/03
- Double Standard: Blindly Blame Bush - 07/18/03
- Was WWII Also Unjustified? - 07/20/03
- Clinton Backing Bush? Don't Bet On It! - 07/24/03
- How To Be A Hypocritical Liberal - 07/28/03
- The Clinton Legacy: In Answer to Mr. Stensrud - 07/30/03
-What Is 'Good News' To Liberals? - 08/02/03
- Bush's Big Blunder - 08/06/03
- The Meaning of Right - Why I Supported the Iraq War - 08/10/03
- More Liberal "Rules" for Arguing - 08/14/03
- You Can Have Cary Grant; I'll Take John Wayne! - 08/19/03
- Where Is The ACLU When It's Actually Needed? - 08/25/03
- Who's Afraid Of The Big Bad Ten Commandments? - 08/28/03
- From The Weasels: Thanks For Nothing - 08/30/03
- The Liberal Superfriends - 09/02/03
- Liberal Superfriends 2: The Sequel - 09/05/03
- Saddam and 9/11: Connect the Dots - 09/08/03
- Throwing Away the Southern Vote - 11/02/03
- Libya: The First Domino Falls - 12/20/03
- Is the UN Playing Games with American Politics? - 03/04/04


Blogs to Browse

Across the Pond
AlphaPatriot
Arts for Democracy
Betsy's Page
Bill Karl
Blonde Sagacity
Bull Moose Strikes Back
Common Sense & Wonder
Conservative Pleasure
Dangerous Logic
DowneastBlog
ElectionProjection
Everything I Know Is Wrong
Freedom of Thought
Sally Girl
Korla Pundit
LogiPundit.com
MarkLevinFan
Mark Nicodemo
Michelle Malkin
Moonbattery
My Arse From My Elbow
QandO Blog
RadioBS.net
Rebel Rouser
RightThinkingGirl
Sally Girl
Samantha Burns
Semi-Intelligent Thoughts
Sighed Effects
Sister Toldjah
Stark Truth
Take A Stand Against Liberals
The Resplendent Mango
The Right Society
The YNC
Tom's Common Sense
Tom DeLay
Tomfoolery of the Highest Order
Trying to Grok
TS Right Dominion
Violent Daydreams
Watcher of Weasels
Word Around the Net
WuzzaDem.com



Locations of visitors to this page


Wednesday, January 19, 2005
Witch Hunts on Capitol Hill

Imagine you're getting an executive promotion. There's no chance you won't get it -- you're eminently qualified, the only serious candidate, and the CEO himself offered you the spot. Hell, you've even got them painting your name on the door already. The only thing left is the formality of meeting with the board of directors, who already know you very well. After all, you've been working with them for years in your current position.

When you sit down with the directors, however, they take a different tack from the expected formal question-and-answer about your qualifications and ideas on how to handle the problems you will face. One by one, they lecture you, berate you, and make personal attacks against you. They impugn your honor and honesty, deride your abilities, and sarcastically address you in overly-familiar terms. They attack and undermine the CEO, criticising his job performance and decision-making abilities as well as yours, hypocritically using perfect 20-20 hindsight to lay undeserved blame on both of you for not avoiding unforeseeable problems that none of them foresaw either. They even accuse you of being involved in criminal activities and conspiracies. Instead of the hour or so such a formality would normally take at most, this grilling goes on for hour after hour after hour, all staged to undermine your credibility with the stockholders. And the worst part is that there's still no chance you won't get the job, even after this pointless free-for-all verbal butchery. Would you be shocked at this behavior? Stunned? Would you even want to work with people who behaved like this?

Watching the so-called "confirmation hearings" for Condoleezza Rice and Alberto Gonzales confirmed only one thing -- that I will probably never hold a political position. Even if President Bush personally called to offer me a cabinet post, I would have to turn him down. I can imagine the conversation going something like this:

BUSH: I called to offer you a post on my cabinet.
ME: I'm flattered, Your Presidentness, but I'm going to have to refuse. I'd never make it through the confirmation hearings -- I'd end up with my fingers wrapped around the throat of at least one Senator.
BUSH: Well, in that case, ya want TWO cabinet posts?

The members of each committee, under the guise of asking questions, used the time to make long-winded speeches. They attacked both Gonzales and Rice while sniping at President Bush from behind cover. They bullied, bloviated and bellyached by turns, competing for media attention. Is that what we pay them for -- abusing public servants while pontificating from a personal soapbox for the benefit of the cameras? Barbara Boxer (D-CA) repeatedly accused Rice and the President of lying. Condi put Boxer in her place in no uncertain terms. "Senator, we can have this discussion in any way that you would like. But I really hope that you will refrain from impugning my integrity. Thank you very much," Rice said calmly. Joe Biden (D-DE) snarled at Gonzales, "We're looking for candor, old buddy." John Kerry (D-loser) droned on and on about how he would have been a better President, done everything differently, and it all would have worked out somehow. I'm not sure he ever actually asked a question. He seems to think he's still on the campaign trail. All the questioners on both committees seemed intent on undermining pubic support for the war in Iraq as much as possible. They accused Gonzales of being responsible for the crimes committed by a few soldiers at Abu Ghraib, just as they've tried to link everyone in the administration from the President to the White House gardener, with the same lack of reason. They repeatedly asked Rice when we're leaving the country, like annoying children on a trip asking, "Are we there yet? Are we there yet?" while the car is still in the driveway. They seemed not to realise that she has been the National Security Advisor for the last four years, not the Secretary of Defense or Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Biden, however, seemed to think it was a good opportunity to attack Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who was not present. "Whatever you do," he warned Rice,"don't listen to Rumsfeld. He doesn't know what the hell he's talking about." No information is available on how many military victories Biden has won; Rumsfeld has presided over the fall of Afghanistan and Iraq with fewer American casualties than some training exercises.

Instead of asking pertinent, pointed questions that would have told us how Gonzales and Rice will deal with the problems we face now, and will likely encounter in the future, the interrogators wasted our time and tax dollars with irrelevant bluster. They could have asked Gonzales serious questions like, "As Attorney General, how do you plan to deal with the fact that more illegal immigrants are being detained at the borders than the processing centers can hold?" Instead, the closest anyone came was Arlen Specter (R?-PA), who expressed concern that illegal aliens were detained right after 9/11 without any proof that they were terrorists. "And immediately after 9/11, as the inspector general's report showed, some 702 aliens were detained without any showing of cause: concern that they might be terrorists, but no real evidence or indications that they were terrorists," Specter complained. I'll never understand why the non-existent legal "rights" of non-citizen criminals outweighs the national security of Americans to some people. They could have asked Condoleezza Rice about her views on the alliance between North Korea, Russia and China, and whether it poses a threat to us. (Hint: yes!) Instead, they chose to score points with the Bush-haters, whiners, and malcontents... in other words, the Liberal base of the Democratic party.

Perhaps some rules should be put in place that would require questions to be relevant to the matter at hand. That will probably never happen, however, as Senators relish their brief moments in the spotlight all too much. Relevant questions would be boring; the media survives on confrontation... and politicians live for the opportunity to score "face time" and a sound byte on their local news.

Posted at Wednesday, January 19, 2005 by CavalierX

Van Helsing
January 19, 2005   06:40 PM PST
 
I wish Condi Rice and Barbara Boxer could publicly debate more often -- preferably right before elections.
Angrydog
January 21, 2005   12:58 PM PST
 
Yes, but what do we burn besides witches? :-P
logipundit
January 21, 2005   02:04 PM PST
 
The sad thing is...this has been standard operating procedure for four years. It is completely independent of whether it is a campaign season or not. They are willing to make themselves look like complete assholes consistently on a daily basis if it means they can hurt anyone in the Bush administration even a little bit.

Kudos to Condi for standing up to them. We need more of that. Honestly I would take it a step further and refuse to take questions from Senators who do not stay on topic and make a habit of "grandstanding."
G71
January 21, 2005   07:54 PM PST
 
LOL! I agree, It'd be hard to resist strangling a certain Cali Sen. or two Mass. Senators.
Jamie
January 22, 2005   12:36 AM PST
 
This is not new and it hasn't just been during the last four years. Now granted, there was a long hiatus (during the 8 years of Clinton) where we didn't see this type of b-s. Have you forgotten that T. Kennedy said "in "Robert Bork's America . . . women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens' doors in midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution," etc.?
Don Riccardo
January 27, 2005   03:30 PM PST
 
Like the talk show host we listened to in the '60s, Joe Pine would say to a person like Barbara Boxer, "Go gargle with razor blades. Yu Commie Pinko Pervert!"
Bjorn
January 30, 2005   10:05 AM PST
 

Why do I get the feeling that these people are cowards?
 

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments




Previous Entry Home Next Entry