Click to bookmark this page!

- Contact Me -
Include your email address

<< January 2005 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01
02 03 04 05 06 07 08
09 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31


Just in case you weren't sure...
If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:

Please sign the Ted Kennedy Resignation Petition!


rss feed

Shameless Self-Promotion

Buy this book (not just because it contains two of my op-eds):
Americans on Politics, Policy, and Pop Culture:
The 101 Best Opinion Editorials From OpEds.com


An Interview With the G-Man:
My first (hopefully not last) experience in live radio, being interviewed by G. Gordon Liddy!



Perspective
Joe Mariani

Number of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships by precision use of American military force under George W. Bush:
50 million in just two years

Number of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships by anti-American Bush-bashing terrorist-appeasing whining elitists:
Zero. Ever.
...

The problem seems to me to be the definition of "free speech". Liberals define it as anything they want to say or do that opposes America. I say "speech" ends where "action" begins. Once you pick up a gun for the enemy, throw a rock at a cop during a "peace" march, send money to a terrorist organisation, or travel to Baghdad to block an American JDAM with your ass, you have crossed the line from free speech to costly action.
...

Saying the War on Terror is all about al-Qaeda is like saying we should have fought the Japanese Naval Air Force after Pearl Harbor. Not the Japanese Navy, not the Japanese Army, not the Empire of Japan -- just the Naval Air Force.
...

Complaining about the "waste" when human embryos are destroyed instead of being used in medical experiments is a lot like going to a funeral and complaining about the waste of perfectly good meat.
...

Blaming CO2 for climate change is like blaming smoke for the fire. CO2 is largely a following, not a leading, indicator of a rise in temperature.
...

Cavalier's First Theorem:
Every time, Liberals will fight to protect the guilty and kill the innocent, while Conservatives will fight to protect the innocent and punish the guilty.

Cavalier's Second Theorem:
Liberals are just Socialists who want to be loved... then again, Socialists are just Communists who lack the courage of their convictions.

Cavalier's Third Theorem:
Any strongly moral, hawkish or pro-American statement by a Liberal will inevitably be followed by a "but."

Top News Headlines

Iraq Blogs

The Messopotamian
Iraq at a Glance
Iraq the Model
Hammorabi
Iraq & Iraqis
Nabil's Blog
Road of a Nation
The Sun of Iraq
Healing Iraq

Iraqi Bloggers Central

The Truth About Iraq
Liberating Iraq
Pictures from Iraq
The Iraqi Holocaust: a collection
Iraq's Mass Graves

Mudville Gazette:
News the media can't use

The Other Iraq:
The Iraq you never hear about in the MSM

Michael Yon - Online Magazine
Dispatches not filed from the Baghdad Hilton hot tub


United States Central Command


Humor

Infamous Monsters of Filmland

Day by Day: Chris Muir's witty comic strip with a political bent

The Ultimate War Simulation: Why does this scenario seem so familiar?

What Kind of Liberal Are You?
Save me the trouble of figuring out what kind of idiot you are

Blame Bush
Because Bush is to blame... for everything

Sacred Cow Burgers
Web Archive

Satirical Political Beliefs Test

Communists for Kerry

Cooper's Protester Guide

Fellowship 9/11: Sauron never attacked Rohan, Saruman did! Yet a small group of elitists convinced Middle-earth to divert resources from the real war to attack Mordor for personal gain.


Analysis

When Democrats Attack
Did prominent Democrats switch positions on Iraq just to attack President Bush for political gain? (See the updated list.)

Was Iraqi Freedom Justified?
An honest, step-by-step analysis of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq that Congress voted into law shows that it was.

Saddam's Philanthropy of Terror
Details of solid ties to organised international terrorism

How The Left Betrayed Iraq
by Naseer Flayih Hasan

Did We Botch The Occupation?
No, not of Iraq: of Germany. Read the media's take on how we "lost the peace" in 1946 and compare.

Debunking 8 Anti-War Myths About the Conflict in Iraq

Pictures from Hate Bush/Hate America/Hate Capitalism/Hate Israel/general wacko rallies
- by Zombie

Jihad Watch


2004 Election Links

Looosers: Sorry, Everybody!
Winners: You're Welcome, Everybody!


2008 Election

Peace Through Strength PAC


Duncan Hunter in 2008
official site



Click to join duncanhunterforpresident2008 at Yahoo! Groups

Useful Links

FamilyWishList
Share your wish list with friends and family

Virtual Tourist
Travel tips from real travelers

RemBot.com
Appointment calendar with email/wireless notification

PriceGrabber.com
Convenient comparison shopping


Reading Material

RightWingNews
The best right-wing news and commentary

GOP USA Commentary Corner

Men's News Daily
The New Media

OpinionEditorials.com
a project of Frontiers of Freedom

ChronWatch
SF Chronicle watchdog and conservative news

American Daily
Analysis with political and social commentary

The Conservative Voice
Conservative news and opinion

News By Us
...not news bias

IntellectualConservative.com
Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics

CommonConservative.com
Practical conservatism for the common man

USASentinel
Analysis, Commentary and Opinion on the Real World

PhillyFuture.org
Philly news and blogs


Now Reading

The Fatal Conceit:
The Errors of Socialism
by F. A. Hayek



Articles Previously Published at
Useless-Knowledge.com

- When Good Liberals Go Bad - 05/29/03
- How Stupid Do Democrats Think You Are? - 05/31/03
- Who Are These 'Rich' Getting Tax Cuts, Anyway? - 06/02/03
- How Can We Miss The Clintons If They Won't Go Away? - 06/04/03
- Whining of Mass Distraction: How To Discredit A President - 06/05/03
- Liberal "Rules" for Arguing - 06/10/03
- Liberalism: Curable or Terminal? - 06/14/03
- Filibustering Judges: Hijacking Presidential Powers? - 06/17/03
- Is Hamas Exempt from the War on Terror? - 06/22/03
- How Malleable Is The Constitution? - 06/26/03
- Rejecting Our Biological and Cultural Heritage - 06/30/03
- I Need Liberal Assistance, Now! - 07/02/03
- Bring Them On - 07/03/03
- We Need You Arrogant Warmongering Americans...Again - 07/09/03
- Much Ado About Nothing, Again - 07/13/03
- Double Standard: Blindly Blame Bush - 07/18/03
- Was WWII Also Unjustified? - 07/20/03
- Clinton Backing Bush? Don't Bet On It! - 07/24/03
- How To Be A Hypocritical Liberal - 07/28/03
- The Clinton Legacy: In Answer to Mr. Stensrud - 07/30/03
-What Is 'Good News' To Liberals? - 08/02/03
- Bush's Big Blunder - 08/06/03
- The Meaning of Right - Why I Supported the Iraq War - 08/10/03
- More Liberal "Rules" for Arguing - 08/14/03
- You Can Have Cary Grant; I'll Take John Wayne! - 08/19/03
- Where Is The ACLU When It's Actually Needed? - 08/25/03
- Who's Afraid Of The Big Bad Ten Commandments? - 08/28/03
- From The Weasels: Thanks For Nothing - 08/30/03
- The Liberal Superfriends - 09/02/03
- Liberal Superfriends 2: The Sequel - 09/05/03
- Saddam and 9/11: Connect the Dots - 09/08/03
- Throwing Away the Southern Vote - 11/02/03
- Libya: The First Domino Falls - 12/20/03
- Is the UN Playing Games with American Politics? - 03/04/04


Blogs to Browse

Across the Pond
AlphaPatriot
Arts for Democracy
Betsy's Page
Bill Karl
Blonde Sagacity
Bull Moose Strikes Back
Common Sense & Wonder
Conservative Pleasure
Dangerous Logic
DowneastBlog
ElectionProjection
Everything I Know Is Wrong
Freedom of Thought
Sally Girl
Korla Pundit
LogiPundit.com
MarkLevinFan
Mark Nicodemo
Michelle Malkin
Moonbattery
My Arse From My Elbow
QandO Blog
RadioBS.net
Rebel Rouser
RightThinkingGirl
Sally Girl
Samantha Burns
Semi-Intelligent Thoughts
Sighed Effects
Sister Toldjah
Stark Truth
Take A Stand Against Liberals
The Resplendent Mango
The Right Society
The YNC
Tom's Common Sense
Tom DeLay
Tomfoolery of the Highest Order
Trying to Grok
TS Right Dominion
Violent Daydreams
Watcher of Weasels
Word Around the Net
WuzzaDem.com



Locations of visitors to this page


Thursday, January 27, 2005
Hillary Clinton: One Step Back, Shift To The Right

And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed -- if all records told the same tale -- then the lie passed into history and became truth. 'Who controls the past,' ran the Party slogan, 'controls the future; who controls the present controls the past.'
-
1984, George Orwell

You can bet that Hillary Clinton paid attention to all the mistakes made during John Kerry's failed Presidential run. Her brothers, Hugh and Tony, confirmed her intention to run in 2008. We can look forward to four years of watching Hillary pretending to moderate her fairly Liberal positions on the issues enough to gather up some of those red-state votes for herself. It would be amusing to watch, were it not for the near certainty of "mainstream" media cooperation. Taking a page right out of George Orwell's 1984, the media will go right along with the pretense that her new positions on various issues have always been her positions.

Hillary Clinton's entire career can be understood through examining her college experience. Hillary interned with lawyer Robert Treuhaft, who worked for the Communist Party USA. She studied law at Yale, under Professor Thomas I. Emerson, another CPUSA member known as "Tommy the Commie." Hillary met with and wrote her senior thesis about radical organiser Saul Alinsky, a Marxist who counseled potential agitators to work their way into power from within the system, then use that power to bring it down.

Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals" included such admonitions as, "Make the enemy live up to his/her own book of rules. You can kill them with this. They can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity." What better explanation of the Democratic vilification of Senator Trent Lott (R-MS) could be found? Lott was attacked for his feel-good praise of 100-year-old Senator Strom Thurmond, once a Segregationist before eschewing discrimination. His fellow Republicans forced him to step down from his position as majority leader. Meanwhile, the same Democrats continue to ignore the presence in the Senate of former KKK Kleagle Robert Byrd (D-WV). "The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength" can be seen in action as Democrats accuse Republicans of such things as plotting to bring back the draft or wanting to steal Grandma's Social Security check. This puts them on the defensive against phantom charges with no basis in fact, which are almost impossible to refute. Another rule, "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it," can be seen in all the personal attacks made by Liberal Democrats on President Bush and the members of his administration. Most recently, this tactic appeared during the confirmation "hearings" for Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, who was defamed and maligned throughout the proceedings.

Hillary Clinton's association with radical causes continued, though on a more subdued note. Her plan for socialised medicine in America, caricatured as "Hillarycare," was widely considered a contributing factor in the Republican takeover of Congress in 1994. Hillary Clinton introduced keynote speaker Walter Cronkite at a gathering of the World Federalist Association in 1999. The WFA is the advocacy group for world government by the United Nations that unsuccessfully sued the US in 1986, arguing that Article VI of the Constitution should make the UN Charter the "supreme law of the land." No law can possibly be placed above the Constitution of the United States, by definition the governing document of the country. Were Clinton to get into office, however, those who advocate surrendering American sovereignty to the corrupt bureaucracy of the United Nations would gain a powerful ally.

We can see the "chameleon" mentality at work in Senator Clinton's shifting positions as she lays the groundwork now for her 2008 campaign. One reason Kerry lost was that he waited too long to shift his positions towards the right. Hillary won't make that mistake; she's starting already... although she risks losing her Liberal base by doing so. She knows, however, that there are far more moderate Democrats and middle-of-the-road voters than Liberals, and it's the votes that count.

Hillary has moved far to the right on illegal immigration -- to the right of President Bush, in fact. In an interview on WABC radio, she stated, "I am, you know, adamantly against illegal immigrants." She attacked Bush for not tightening the borders enough to prevent illegal immigrants from entering the country. However, she co-sponsored bill S. 2381 with Ted Kennedy, the "Safe, Orderly, Legal Visas and Enforcement Act of 2004." The bill included an amnesty that would have granted Legal Permanent Resident status to illegal aliens (and their spouses and minor children) who have lived in the US for at least 5 years, and worked for an aggregate of 2 years. This would have included just about every illegal immigrant currently living in the US. She also cosponsored S. 1545, the DREAM Act of 2003. The bill would have granted in-state tuition and amnesty to illegal aliens under the age of 21 who had lived in America for five years and were currently in 7th grade or above. The Agricultural Job Opportunity, Benefits, and Security Act of 2003 (S. 1645) also listed Hillary as a cosponsor. The bill would have granted amnesty to illegal immigrants who had 100 days of agricultural employment in the 18-month period that ended on 31 August 2003. To her credit, she did cosponsor S. 1749, the Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act of 2001, which would have created an alien tracking and identification system. However, her record can hardly be summed up as being "adamantly against illegal immigrants."

Hillary's rightward shuffle can also be seen in her position on abortion. While addressing a group of abortion supporters this week, Hillary spoke of finding "common ground" with foes of abortion, referring to it as a "sad, even tragic choice." She told the crowd, "I for one respect those who believe with all their heart and conscience that there are no circumstances under which abortion should be available." In fact, Hillary Clinton enjoys a 100% rating from NARAL, the pro-abortion group, which indicates the percentage of her votes on key issues that match the organisation's views. On 22 Jan 2000, she told the New York Times, "I am and always have been pro-choice, and that is not a right any of should take for granted. There are a number of forces at work in our society that would try to turn back the clock and undermine a woman’s right to chose, and [we] must remain vigilant."

Her history of strong support for abortion contrasts starkly with her position on religion and faith-based initiatives. The night before President Bush's second inauguration, Hillary spoke at a fund-raising dinner for the National TenPoint Leadership Foundation and the Ella J. Baker House, organisations that embrace faith-based initiatives. According to the Boston Globe, Hillary said, "There is no contradiction between support for faith-based initiatives and upholding our constitutional principles." Addressing a crowd of more than 500, including many religious leaders, she invoked God more than half a dozen times, at one point declaring, "I've always been a praying person." Hillary said there must be room for religious people to "live out their faith in the public square." However, in 1993 (according to FrontPage Magazine), she lobbied the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to create a new category of crime, "religious harassment." It would have led to disciplinary action for anyone of management level who wore a cross or yarmulke, or kept a Bible in plain sight at work. Where was she in 2002, when the Yonkers district of New York banned Christmas and Hannukah from its schools? Where was she when New York City banned nativity scenes in 2003? One would expect the state's Senator to have something to say, especially when she purports to have such strong religious feelings and has "always been a praying person."

What does she pray for? That no one notices her positions shifting as she makes her play for the "gullible, ignorant red-stater" vote in 2008? Well, that's one prayer that's going to go unanswered.

Posted at Thursday, January 27, 2005 by CavalierX

Jamie
January 27, 2005   07:16 PM PST
 
All of this needs to be kept in front of the voters for the next 4 years so that people are aware of this. Americans have short memories and they will forget what her stated views were, what her voting record is and will listen only to what she blathers when she actually runs for office. Tom Daschle tried to run away from his record, as did John Kerry - fortunately they could run, but they could not hide. My only hope is that the Republican ticket is a strong one come 2008!
Psychic Ferret
January 28, 2005   01:16 PM PST
 
The gradual erosion of the old, liberal Hillary will leave a new, "born again" (pun intended) version that she hopes will fool the voters.

Let's hope that everyone remembers their Lincoln.
Ben
January 28, 2005   01:30 PM PST
 
How does having a law proffesor who belongs to the Communist party have anything to do with one's own political views?
JM
January 28, 2005   01:42 PM PST
 
>How does having a law proffesor
>who belongs to the Communist
>party have anything to do with
>one's own political views?

Part of a pattern of authority figures and mentors who were Communists. She was more or less immersed in it.
Jamie
January 28, 2005   10:04 PM PST
 
This article from 1993, says a lot about Hillary's penchant for appearances which are contrary to her actual beliefs - her "media-made" image:

http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/1993/vo09no14/vo09no14_hillary.htm

Even then, they were talking about her future run for the presidency. T
Jamie
January 28, 2005   10:12 PM PST
 
Hillary has a lot of history -

http://www.usasurvival.org/ck061903.shtml
JM
January 28, 2005   10:21 PM PST
 
Great articles, Jamie. Anyone who uses the word "oleaginous" in connection with Hillary has all my attention. :)
Jamie
January 28, 2005   10:46 PM PST
 
Hillary Clinton is one of the most power-mad people on this earth and her ascendency to power is frightening. People who crave power like that should be feared. I know that the President of the U.S. is kept in check by the very structure of our government, with its checks and balances. But lately, some of those checks and balances are being challenged (in the courts, for example).
Fred
February 14, 2005   11:38 AM PST
 
I distinctly remember reading an interview with Hillary shortly before or after her husband became president. The interviewer asked her what her and Bill Clinton's political views were in collage. Her answer was, we were committed Marxist in those days. As I listen to some of the rhetoric that Hillary puts forth I keep remembering the movie The Manchurian Candidate

Mannning
February 15, 2005   12:58 PM PST
 




Great post Cav. Tracking Hillary over the next 4 years is imperative!
Then publishing widely the shifts!
Mad heron
March 13, 2005   04:58 PM PST
 
We sure dont need attila the hen in the whitehouse she will be worse then ten bill clintons i mean this is the wicked witch of the west I,LL GET YOU MY PRETTY AND YOUR LITTLE DOG TO
 

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments




Previous Entry Home Next Entry