Click to bookmark this page!

- Contact Me -
Include your email address

<< February 2005 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28


Just in case you weren't sure...
If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:

Please sign the Ted Kennedy Resignation Petition!


rss feed

Shameless Self-Promotion

Buy this book (not just because it contains two of my op-eds):
Americans on Politics, Policy, and Pop Culture:
The 101 Best Opinion Editorials From OpEds.com


An Interview With the G-Man:
My first (hopefully not last) experience in live radio, being interviewed by G. Gordon Liddy!



Perspective
Joe Mariani

Number of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships by precision use of American military force under George W. Bush:
50 million in just two years

Number of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships by anti-American Bush-bashing terrorist-appeasing whining elitists:
Zero. Ever.
...

The problem seems to me to be the definition of "free speech". Liberals define it as anything they want to say or do that opposes America. I say "speech" ends where "action" begins. Once you pick up a gun for the enemy, throw a rock at a cop during a "peace" march, send money to a terrorist organisation, or travel to Baghdad to block an American JDAM with your ass, you have crossed the line from free speech to costly action.
...

Saying the War on Terror is all about al-Qaeda is like saying we should have fought the Japanese Naval Air Force after Pearl Harbor. Not the Japanese Navy, not the Japanese Army, not the Empire of Japan -- just the Naval Air Force.
...

Complaining about the "waste" when human embryos are destroyed instead of being used in medical experiments is a lot like going to a funeral and complaining about the waste of perfectly good meat.
...

Blaming CO2 for climate change is like blaming smoke for the fire. CO2 is largely a following, not a leading, indicator of a rise in temperature.
...

Cavalier's First Theorem:
Every time, Liberals will fight to protect the guilty and kill the innocent, while Conservatives will fight to protect the innocent and punish the guilty.

Cavalier's Second Theorem:
Liberals are just Socialists who want to be loved... then again, Socialists are just Communists who lack the courage of their convictions.

Cavalier's Third Theorem:
Any strongly moral, hawkish or pro-American statement by a Liberal will inevitably be followed by a "but."

Top News Headlines

Iraq Blogs

The Messopotamian
Iraq at a Glance
Iraq the Model
Hammorabi
Iraq & Iraqis
Nabil's Blog
Road of a Nation
The Sun of Iraq
Healing Iraq

Iraqi Bloggers Central

The Truth About Iraq
Liberating Iraq
Pictures from Iraq
The Iraqi Holocaust: a collection
Iraq's Mass Graves

Mudville Gazette:
News the media can't use

The Other Iraq:
The Iraq you never hear about in the MSM

Michael Yon - Online Magazine
Dispatches not filed from the Baghdad Hilton hot tub


United States Central Command


Humor

Infamous Monsters of Filmland

Day by Day: Chris Muir's witty comic strip with a political bent

The Ultimate War Simulation: Why does this scenario seem so familiar?

What Kind of Liberal Are You?
Save me the trouble of figuring out what kind of idiot you are

Blame Bush
Because Bush is to blame... for everything

Sacred Cow Burgers
Web Archive

Satirical Political Beliefs Test

Communists for Kerry

Cooper's Protester Guide

Fellowship 9/11: Sauron never attacked Rohan, Saruman did! Yet a small group of elitists convinced Middle-earth to divert resources from the real war to attack Mordor for personal gain.


Analysis

When Democrats Attack
Did prominent Democrats switch positions on Iraq just to attack President Bush for political gain? (See the updated list.)

Was Iraqi Freedom Justified?
An honest, step-by-step analysis of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq that Congress voted into law shows that it was.

Saddam's Philanthropy of Terror
Details of solid ties to organised international terrorism

How The Left Betrayed Iraq
by Naseer Flayih Hasan

Did We Botch The Occupation?
No, not of Iraq: of Germany. Read the media's take on how we "lost the peace" in 1946 and compare.

Debunking 8 Anti-War Myths About the Conflict in Iraq

Pictures from Hate Bush/Hate America/Hate Capitalism/Hate Israel/general wacko rallies
- by Zombie

Jihad Watch


2004 Election Links

Looosers: Sorry, Everybody!
Winners: You're Welcome, Everybody!


2008 Election

Peace Through Strength PAC


Duncan Hunter in 2008
official site



Click to join duncanhunterforpresident2008 at Yahoo! Groups

Useful Links

FamilyWishList
Share your wish list with friends and family

Virtual Tourist
Travel tips from real travelers

RemBot.com
Appointment calendar with email/wireless notification

PriceGrabber.com
Convenient comparison shopping


Reading Material

RightWingNews
The best right-wing news and commentary

GOP USA Commentary Corner

Men's News Daily
The New Media

OpinionEditorials.com
a project of Frontiers of Freedom

ChronWatch
SF Chronicle watchdog and conservative news

American Daily
Analysis with political and social commentary

The Conservative Voice
Conservative news and opinion

News By Us
...not news bias

IntellectualConservative.com
Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics

CommonConservative.com
Practical conservatism for the common man

USASentinel
Analysis, Commentary and Opinion on the Real World

PhillyFuture.org
Philly news and blogs


Now Reading

The Fatal Conceit:
The Errors of Socialism
by F. A. Hayek



Articles Previously Published at
Useless-Knowledge.com

- When Good Liberals Go Bad - 05/29/03
- How Stupid Do Democrats Think You Are? - 05/31/03
- Who Are These 'Rich' Getting Tax Cuts, Anyway? - 06/02/03
- How Can We Miss The Clintons If They Won't Go Away? - 06/04/03
- Whining of Mass Distraction: How To Discredit A President - 06/05/03
- Liberal "Rules" for Arguing - 06/10/03
- Liberalism: Curable or Terminal? - 06/14/03
- Filibustering Judges: Hijacking Presidential Powers? - 06/17/03
- Is Hamas Exempt from the War on Terror? - 06/22/03
- How Malleable Is The Constitution? - 06/26/03
- Rejecting Our Biological and Cultural Heritage - 06/30/03
- I Need Liberal Assistance, Now! - 07/02/03
- Bring Them On - 07/03/03
- We Need You Arrogant Warmongering Americans...Again - 07/09/03
- Much Ado About Nothing, Again - 07/13/03
- Double Standard: Blindly Blame Bush - 07/18/03
- Was WWII Also Unjustified? - 07/20/03
- Clinton Backing Bush? Don't Bet On It! - 07/24/03
- How To Be A Hypocritical Liberal - 07/28/03
- The Clinton Legacy: In Answer to Mr. Stensrud - 07/30/03
-What Is 'Good News' To Liberals? - 08/02/03
- Bush's Big Blunder - 08/06/03
- The Meaning of Right - Why I Supported the Iraq War - 08/10/03
- More Liberal "Rules" for Arguing - 08/14/03
- You Can Have Cary Grant; I'll Take John Wayne! - 08/19/03
- Where Is The ACLU When It's Actually Needed? - 08/25/03
- Who's Afraid Of The Big Bad Ten Commandments? - 08/28/03
- From The Weasels: Thanks For Nothing - 08/30/03
- The Liberal Superfriends - 09/02/03
- Liberal Superfriends 2: The Sequel - 09/05/03
- Saddam and 9/11: Connect the Dots - 09/08/03
- Throwing Away the Southern Vote - 11/02/03
- Libya: The First Domino Falls - 12/20/03
- Is the UN Playing Games with American Politics? - 03/04/04


Blogs to Browse

Across the Pond
AlphaPatriot
Arts for Democracy
Betsy's Page
Bill Karl
Blonde Sagacity
Bull Moose Strikes Back
Common Sense & Wonder
Conservative Pleasure
Dangerous Logic
DowneastBlog
ElectionProjection
Everything I Know Is Wrong
Freedom of Thought
Sally Girl
Korla Pundit
LogiPundit.com
MarkLevinFan
Mark Nicodemo
Michelle Malkin
Moonbattery
My Arse From My Elbow
QandO Blog
RadioBS.net
Rebel Rouser
RightThinkingGirl
Sally Girl
Samantha Burns
Semi-Intelligent Thoughts
Sighed Effects
Sister Toldjah
Stark Truth
Take A Stand Against Liberals
The Resplendent Mango
The Right Society
The YNC
Tom's Common Sense
Tom DeLay
Tomfoolery of the Highest Order
Trying to Grok
TS Right Dominion
Violent Daydreams
Watcher of Weasels
Word Around the Net
WuzzaDem.com



Locations of visitors to this page


Monday, February 21, 2005
The Chinese Conundrum

The growing problem with China may well become insurmountable by the end of this decade, if something isn't done about it. Like most problems, playing ostrich will only make things worse in the long run. The time to begin dealing with China is right now.

China has been acquiring a great deal of military equipment from their new partner, Russia. In fact, joint Chinese-Russian military exercises are scheduled for this year. China has also made alliance with North Korea, supplying them with 70% of their energy and 40% of their food. The two countries have conducted joint border patrols. Both military partnerships translate into an exchange of knowledge and technology. China supplies money, food and technology to North Korea, and North Korea supplies weapons and nuclear technology to Iran. "We know there is cooperation between North Korea and Iran in the nuclear field. The Iranians have a very comprehensive military nuclear program, and North Korea has been crucial in that," said Yossef Bodansky, director of the US Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare. Iran funds and supplies al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups, and is about to use the knowledge acquired from North Korea to become a nuclear power.

China has been expanding its influence elsewhere in the world. They have been making heavy investments in the Caribbean, giving money and promising heavy tourist trade in exchange for economic ties. Their aim is to woo those nations away from their rival, Taiwan. "Two weeks before Dominica changed sides," the Associate Press reported, "Taiwan gave it $9 million. China promised Dominica $112 million over the next six years." For the first time ever, a Communist military deployment took place in the Western hemisphere, when China dispatched 95 "police officers" to join the UN peacekeeping mission in Haiti.

More than 3,000 companies in the US are suspected of collecting technological information for China. In the Silicon Valley alone, the number of Chinese espionage cases handled by the FBI increases by between 20% and 30% every year. Chinese operatives are buying American technology and sending it to China at an alarming rate. How is this buying spree, military deployments and support for rogue nations financed?

Right now, China is experiencing an economic boom that has caused them to overtake the US as the world's largest consumer nation. Their voracious consumption of oil is a major factor in rising oil prices. Meanwhile, they sell their manufactured goods around the world at a fraction of the price similar domestically-manufactured items would cost. The Chinese government has used the proceeds from this boom not to make life better for their people, but to buy up the US debts owed to other countries. If they ever call it in at once while raising their export prices, China could conceivably bankrupt the US. So how can the Chinese afford to take over our debt, and charge us so little for their manufactured goods that they can outsell us on our own soil? Where is China getting all this wealth with which to buy influence and allies around the world?

To be blunt, they're getting it from us.

The Chinese learned their lesson from watching the implosion of the Soviet Union's insular economy. They have also seen how a closed economy has caused North Korea to become dependent on foreign aid, while their only exports are illegal weapons and nuclear knowledge. Over the last decade or so, China's government has taken several steps to open their economy to world trade while continuing to keep their people under totalitarian rule. They can manufacture their sale goods more cheaply than we ever could, since they have access to a nearly unlimited supply of virtual slave labor. 

In the early 1990s, China became "the single largest source of imported footwear in the United States market," according to Nicholas R. Lardy of the Institute for International Economics. During his testimony before the House Committee on International Relations in October 2003, Lardy stated, "Firms located in China are now the second largest supplier of imports to the United States." China also became our largest source of toys and sporting goods during the 1990s, and became our largest supplier of consumer electronics and computer technology in 2002.

When you buy anything made in China, it was very likely assembled, grown or built in a laogai, or forced labor camp -- brutal places that combine all the worst features of Soviet gulags and Nazi death camps. According to the Laogai Research Foundation, "The two major aims of the laogai are to use all prisoners as a source of cheap labor for the communist regime and to 'reform criminals' through hard labor and compulsory political indoctrination."

Harry Wu, who spent 19 years in laogai, described the harsh conditions of these prisons. "At first I worked in a chemical factory in Beijing. We would work from 12 p.m. till a.m. in a straight shift. There was no protection for the slave laborers. We got burns on our skin, and many people were injured." The Chinese simply found a way to make the old Soviet gulag system turn a profit, but at a severe human cost. "All of the slave laborers became animals. You can take the very best men in the world, and if you put them in the laogai, after a time they will all become beasts," lamented Wu.

Now, our government has to "play nice" with China. They need China to deal with their North Korean ally, Kim Jong Il. The Bush administration hopes that capitalism will lead to greater freedom in China. However, we the consumers are under no such restrictions, and few of us are so hopeful about democratic reforms taking place without pressure. Luckily, we do have the power to choose what we buy. If enough Americans are willing to spend a few extra dollars to avoid items made by slave labor in Chinese work camps, we can avoid helping a brutal Communist dictatorship that funds and aids our enemies.

Many Americans say they'd like to help win the war on terror. One thing we can do is stop funding it.

Posted at Monday, February 21, 2005 by CavalierX

GoNavy25
February 21, 2005   07:25 PM PST
 
I heard that China might become a threat later since everything is booming for them.
JM
February 21, 2005   08:09 PM PST
 
a) It's booming because they use slave labor

b) maybe we should try to prevent them from becoming a direct threat, instead of waiting until they are a direct threat to deal with them

c) if they're funding our enemies, they are an indirect threat already
JM
February 23, 2005   08:52 PM PST
 
>our European "allies" could be on
>the verge of lifting the arms
>embargo

They will, I have no doubt. Their socialist economies are failing and they need the money. It's a horror show in the making.
Name
February 25, 2005   10:38 PM PST
 
95 police officers in Haiti? Wow. I guess we ought to stockpile crates of freeze-dried Spam in our concrete doomsday-shelters then. And maybe I ought to buy me some concertina wire for the back yard.
JM
February 26, 2005   12:46 AM PST
 
It's a precedent that should not be set. Unless, of course, you like the idea of Communist soldiers camping out in the Caribbean.
Mannning
February 27, 2005   11:22 PM PST
 
I wonder what the effect would be on the Chinese economy if they did call in our debts somehow? A huge portion of their factory output would be frozen in warehouses and docks.
And if the US went broke, so would they, since they have pledged billions of their (then worthless) dollars to buy from Europeans and the Oil countries. Aren't they snared into the global economy now?
 

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments




Previous Entry Home Next Entry