Click to bookmark this page!

- Contact Me -
Include your email address

<< April 2005 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01 02
03 04 05 06 07 08 09
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30


Just in case you weren't sure...
If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:

Please sign the Ted Kennedy Resignation Petition!


rss feed

Shameless Self-Promotion

Buy this book (not just because it contains two of my op-eds):
Americans on Politics, Policy, and Pop Culture:
The 101 Best Opinion Editorials From OpEds.com


An Interview With the G-Man:
My first (hopefully not last) experience in live radio, being interviewed by G. Gordon Liddy!



Perspective
Joe Mariani

Number of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships by precision use of American military force under George W. Bush:
50 million in just two years

Number of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships by anti-American Bush-bashing terrorist-appeasing whining elitists:
Zero. Ever.
...

The problem seems to me to be the definition of "free speech". Liberals define it as anything they want to say or do that opposes America. I say "speech" ends where "action" begins. Once you pick up a gun for the enemy, throw a rock at a cop during a "peace" march, send money to a terrorist organisation, or travel to Baghdad to block an American JDAM with your ass, you have crossed the line from free speech to costly action.
...

Saying the War on Terror is all about al-Qaeda is like saying we should have fought the Japanese Naval Air Force after Pearl Harbor. Not the Japanese Navy, not the Japanese Army, not the Empire of Japan -- just the Naval Air Force.
...

Complaining about the "waste" when human embryos are destroyed instead of being used in medical experiments is a lot like going to a funeral and complaining about the waste of perfectly good meat.
...

Blaming CO2 for climate change is like blaming smoke for the fire. CO2 is largely a following, not a leading, indicator of a rise in temperature.
...

Cavalier's First Theorem:
Every time, Liberals will fight to protect the guilty and kill the innocent, while Conservatives will fight to protect the innocent and punish the guilty.

Cavalier's Second Theorem:
Liberals are just Socialists who want to be loved... then again, Socialists are just Communists who lack the courage of their convictions.

Cavalier's Third Theorem:
Any strongly moral, hawkish or pro-American statement by a Liberal will inevitably be followed by a "but."

Top News Headlines

Iraq Blogs

The Messopotamian
Iraq at a Glance
Iraq the Model
Hammorabi
Iraq & Iraqis
Nabil's Blog
Road of a Nation
The Sun of Iraq
Healing Iraq

Iraqi Bloggers Central

The Truth About Iraq
Liberating Iraq
Pictures from Iraq
The Iraqi Holocaust: a collection
Iraq's Mass Graves

Mudville Gazette:
News the media can't use

The Other Iraq:
The Iraq you never hear about in the MSM

Michael Yon - Online Magazine
Dispatches not filed from the Baghdad Hilton hot tub


United States Central Command


Humor

Infamous Monsters of Filmland

Day by Day: Chris Muir's witty comic strip with a political bent

The Ultimate War Simulation: Why does this scenario seem so familiar?

What Kind of Liberal Are You?
Save me the trouble of figuring out what kind of idiot you are

Blame Bush
Because Bush is to blame... for everything

Sacred Cow Burgers
Web Archive

Satirical Political Beliefs Test

Communists for Kerry

Cooper's Protester Guide

Fellowship 9/11: Sauron never attacked Rohan, Saruman did! Yet a small group of elitists convinced Middle-earth to divert resources from the real war to attack Mordor for personal gain.


Analysis

When Democrats Attack
Did prominent Democrats switch positions on Iraq just to attack President Bush for political gain? (See the updated list.)

Was Iraqi Freedom Justified?
An honest, step-by-step analysis of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq that Congress voted into law shows that it was.

Saddam's Philanthropy of Terror
Details of solid ties to organised international terrorism

How The Left Betrayed Iraq
by Naseer Flayih Hasan

Did We Botch The Occupation?
No, not of Iraq: of Germany. Read the media's take on how we "lost the peace" in 1946 and compare.

Debunking 8 Anti-War Myths About the Conflict in Iraq

Pictures from Hate Bush/Hate America/Hate Capitalism/Hate Israel/general wacko rallies
- by Zombie

Jihad Watch


2004 Election Links

Looosers: Sorry, Everybody!
Winners: You're Welcome, Everybody!


2008 Election

Peace Through Strength PAC


Duncan Hunter in 2008
official site



Click to join duncanhunterforpresident2008 at Yahoo! Groups

Useful Links

FamilyWishList
Share your wish list with friends and family

Virtual Tourist
Travel tips from real travelers

RemBot.com
Appointment calendar with email/wireless notification

PriceGrabber.com
Convenient comparison shopping


Reading Material

RightWingNews
The best right-wing news and commentary

GOP USA Commentary Corner

Men's News Daily
The New Media

OpinionEditorials.com
a project of Frontiers of Freedom

ChronWatch
SF Chronicle watchdog and conservative news

American Daily
Analysis with political and social commentary

The Conservative Voice
Conservative news and opinion

News By Us
...not news bias

IntellectualConservative.com
Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics

CommonConservative.com
Practical conservatism for the common man

USASentinel
Analysis, Commentary and Opinion on the Real World

PhillyFuture.org
Philly news and blogs


Now Reading

The Fatal Conceit:
The Errors of Socialism
by F. A. Hayek



Articles Previously Published at
Useless-Knowledge.com

- When Good Liberals Go Bad - 05/29/03
- How Stupid Do Democrats Think You Are? - 05/31/03
- Who Are These 'Rich' Getting Tax Cuts, Anyway? - 06/02/03
- How Can We Miss The Clintons If They Won't Go Away? - 06/04/03
- Whining of Mass Distraction: How To Discredit A President - 06/05/03
- Liberal "Rules" for Arguing - 06/10/03
- Liberalism: Curable or Terminal? - 06/14/03
- Filibustering Judges: Hijacking Presidential Powers? - 06/17/03
- Is Hamas Exempt from the War on Terror? - 06/22/03
- How Malleable Is The Constitution? - 06/26/03
- Rejecting Our Biological and Cultural Heritage - 06/30/03
- I Need Liberal Assistance, Now! - 07/02/03
- Bring Them On - 07/03/03
- We Need You Arrogant Warmongering Americans...Again - 07/09/03
- Much Ado About Nothing, Again - 07/13/03
- Double Standard: Blindly Blame Bush - 07/18/03
- Was WWII Also Unjustified? - 07/20/03
- Clinton Backing Bush? Don't Bet On It! - 07/24/03
- How To Be A Hypocritical Liberal - 07/28/03
- The Clinton Legacy: In Answer to Mr. Stensrud - 07/30/03
-What Is 'Good News' To Liberals? - 08/02/03
- Bush's Big Blunder - 08/06/03
- The Meaning of Right - Why I Supported the Iraq War - 08/10/03
- More Liberal "Rules" for Arguing - 08/14/03
- You Can Have Cary Grant; I'll Take John Wayne! - 08/19/03
- Where Is The ACLU When It's Actually Needed? - 08/25/03
- Who's Afraid Of The Big Bad Ten Commandments? - 08/28/03
- From The Weasels: Thanks For Nothing - 08/30/03
- The Liberal Superfriends - 09/02/03
- Liberal Superfriends 2: The Sequel - 09/05/03
- Saddam and 9/11: Connect the Dots - 09/08/03
- Throwing Away the Southern Vote - 11/02/03
- Libya: The First Domino Falls - 12/20/03
- Is the UN Playing Games with American Politics? - 03/04/04


Blogs to Browse

Across the Pond
AlphaPatriot
Arts for Democracy
Betsy's Page
Bill Karl
Blonde Sagacity
Bull Moose Strikes Back
Common Sense & Wonder
Conservative Pleasure
Dangerous Logic
DowneastBlog
ElectionProjection
Everything I Know Is Wrong
Freedom of Thought
Sally Girl
Korla Pundit
LogiPundit.com
MarkLevinFan
Mark Nicodemo
Michelle Malkin
Moonbattery
My Arse From My Elbow
QandO Blog
RadioBS.net
Rebel Rouser
RightThinkingGirl
Sally Girl
Samantha Burns
Semi-Intelligent Thoughts
Sighed Effects
Sister Toldjah
Stark Truth
Take A Stand Against Liberals
The Resplendent Mango
The Right Society
The YNC
Tom's Common Sense
Tom DeLay
Tomfoolery of the Highest Order
Trying to Grok
TS Right Dominion
Violent Daydreams
Watcher of Weasels
Word Around the Net
WuzzaDem.com



Locations of visitors to this page


Saturday, April 09, 2005
The Pope's Goodbye

The sound of the choir's perfect voices faded. A lone bell began to toll. The plain wooden coffin was carried slowly up the steps. The crowd, millions strong, began to cheer even as they wept. And perhaps two billion people watched around the globe...
 
Began to cheer?
 
Why do people believe in religion? I refer to the real believers, not the dabblers and dilettantes who espouse the popular
religion du jour. Some of these fly-by-nights change "faith" more often than I rearrange my furniture, and sometimes with less reason (like, for instance, the bike path dispute that sparked Howard Dean's conversion). Most Liberals keep telling us that religion is all about fear and hatred, but that's what makes them tick; that's the lens through which they view everyone else. I saw no evidence of either fear or hatred from the people celebrating John Paul's life and mourning his death this past week -- just the opposite. The love and esteem in which the Pope was so widely held was simply amazing. The number of believers willing to endure what amounted to a pilgrimage to Rome for his funeral was staggering. Who knew, in this day and age, that so many would be so willing to show their faith? Non-religious people around the world wondered, What do they possibly get out of it?

Religion, it seems, gives the believer two things that secularism can't: the hope that there's more to life than what we can see and touch, and the chance to be a part of it. The idea that there's something after death is central to all major religions. The farewell to Pope John Paul II brought out all of the best the Catholic faith has to offer for the entire world to see, in a spectacle lasting over a week. But John Paul was more than just a leader of Catholics -- he was a religious leader in the true sense of the word. Under his guidance, the various divisions of Christianity came closer together than anytime in the last thousand years. The solemn pageantry and unapologetic public display of faith is something that hasn't been seen since... well, since the last Pope died (two of them!) in 1978. And I don't recall representatives of so many countries and religions, including Iranian theocrats, attending those funerals.

Oddly enough, the once stodgy and boring Church has become something new and different to many young people. A generation of creeping secularism has left many with nowhere to turn for moral guidance and principles. Popular hedonistic philosophies like, "if it feels good, do it," and "he who dies with the most toys, wins," become deeply unsatisfying once you pass your teen years. Anyone mature enough to consider his own mortality wonders whether there just might be something more than the physical life. The secularist answer to this question has usually been, "No! Nothing! Shut up and enjoy yourself! Don't waste time!" Could it be that Leftist suppression of religion and morality over the last quarter century might be the main reason Pope John Paul II held such appeal for so many of the world's youth?

Many seemed surprised at the sheer number of people who turned out around the world to mark the passing of the Pope. The real surprise would be if this event doesn't mark the beginning of a low-key religious resurgence, especially among young Europeans disillusioned with the bleakness of secularism. With all the "glories" of demi-Socialism -- including soaring unemployment rates (especially in France and Germany) and the near-death of family life in some places (like Scandinavia) -- Europeans have become mired in a sort of moral quagmire of their own. Ennui has become the national disease of the European Union.

If John Paul's death actually helps rescue the next generation from their secular decline, perhaps he deserves the title of "Saint" so many want conferred on him by his Church.

Posted at Saturday, April 09, 2005 by CavalierX

Whymrhymer
April 11, 2005   11:53 AM PDT
 
Nice tribute to a good man.

Why do people believe in religion? It's probably, as you said, "the hope that there's more to life than what we can see and touch, and the chance to be a part of it. The idea that there's something after death."

I can't buy either reason!
JM
April 11, 2005   07:00 PM PDT
 
Many Liberals act the way they do because they're utterly convinced there's nothing after death -- that's IT, the END, goodbye. No God, no judgment, nothing at all. That's a little too much self-righteous certainty for my taste. :)
Crazy8tz
April 14, 2005   02:44 PM PDT
 
Though I am by far religious in any fashion, I do remember the many things John Paul II had done. It was he, not Ronald Reagan, who began the ball rolling on the dismantling of communism through his fight for Polish freedom. He was a great man.

Though, I have to say that I am very disappointed in his position, and that of the Catholic Church, on the countless cases of abuse and molestation of children by priests.

I would have expected John Paul II to be more proactive in the prosecution of these blasphemous perpetrators. In stead, he and the church deemed these demented miscreants "untouchable." I specifically remember them stating that a "two strike policy" was too harsh.

Two strikes of robbing child of their innocence and purity is too harsh?!?!?

If John Paul II would have been as enthusiastic about bringing these bastards of God to justice as he was about the abolishment of condoms or the blasphemy of homosexuality, I would have called him a saint.

Instead call him a "once great man, diseased by corruption."

Catholicism is a "Holy Mafia."

~ Crazy8tz
Crazy8tz
April 14, 2005   02:51 PM PDT
 
>>That's a little too much self-righteous certainty for my taste. :)

Don't you find it more self-righteous to believe that no matter what you do in this life, there is a greater being on the other side who will wash away your sins, hold you to his bosom and grant you an eternity of ever-loving happiness?

That sounds pretty self-damn-righteous to me!
The Outlaw Michael Cosyns
April 14, 2005   03:45 PM PDT
 
"The real surprise would be if this event doesn't mark the beginning of a low-key religious resurgence, especially among young Europeans disillusioned with the bleakness of secularism."

Well, I hope so. Even while I'm a low-key christian myself, I find it appalling the way religion seemingly has died in western europe. We had Easter supper at my parents house and I figure I was the only religious person. It didn't feel good.
JM
April 14, 2005   06:42 PM PDT
 
>no matter what you do in this life,
>there is a greater being on the
>other side who will ... grant you
>an eternity of ever-loving
>happiness?

I don't know any major Judeo-Christian religion that says this. No matter what you do? That's something the nuns and priests never told me when I was a kid. I do remember them saying that God doesn't hate anyone, even the ones in Hell, but that's not the same thing as rewarding everyone no matter what they do in life.
TCM
April 17, 2005   01:11 AM PDT
 
Pope John Paul II was a great man who truly practiced what he preached. His forgiveness of and friendship with his would-be assassin, who wept upon hearing of his death, is an example of what we should all aspire to. Even those who habitually scoff at the Church cannot deny John Paul II's influence as a force to improve the quality of life for people in every country, regardless of their religious beliefs. He will be sorely missed.
Name
April 21, 2005   08:54 PM PDT
 
Child Mositation by priests!!! Never addressed, need I say more???? He was no saint in my opinion, maybe he was good for the world, but he was NOT good for the children of this world by any means!! There, I said it!!! May God himself forgive me.

Maureen
Kent
April 22, 2005   02:46 PM PDT
 
Yeah, you certainly DO need to say more! I'm sorry, are you accusing JPII of molesting (I assume that's what you mean by "mositation") children, or are you saying that because he didn't cure all the ills of the world (or even of the Church), he was a bad person? He was NOT GOOD FOR CHILDREN?? How about the children living under Communism, to start with? You seem to have a severe personal hatred for a good man you probably never met. Or maybe it's just Catholicism you hate so much.
skye
April 23, 2005   12:24 PM PDT
 

NOT GOOD FOR CHILDREN? I find this comment ironic, if not down right hysterical.

Tell that to the children helped by the Assisi Development Fund:

" The Assisi Development Foundation Scholarship Program seeks to respond to the educational and formative needs of children and youth in difficult circumstances by providing formal and non-formal (vocational/technical) scholarships and educational assistance. Priority for the scholarship grant is given to the children/youth of Indigenous Peoples, the streetchildren-youth, the working children-youth, the handicapped or children of handicapped parents or guardians and children of marginalized farmers and fishers. "

Perhaps you overlooked the work Father Angelo D'Agostino, who founded Nyumbani Villiage to serve the children and elders who have been left behind by the "lost generation" of the AIDS pandemic in Africa.

The Pope himself has publicly commented on the plight of children, perhaps you missed this lenten message from 2004.

Pope's Lenten message, presented Jan. 29, "There are young people," he wrote, "who have been profoundly hurt by the violence of adults: sexual abuse, forced prostitution, involvement in the sale and use of drugs; children forced to work or enlisted for combat; young children scarred forever by the breakup of the family; little ones caught up in the obscene trafficking of organs and persons."

The list of charities and initiatives supported by Pope John Paul II and the Catholic Church is, quite frankly, astounding.

Maureen, instead of posting another ill informed statement regarding the Catholic Church and Pope John Paul II, do something that is really constructive:

Pledge support to Nyumbani Villiage.
http://www.nyumbanivillage.org/

or

Assisi Development Foundation, Pope John Paul II Programs.
http://assisifoundation.mariansolidarity.com/JP.html




 

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments




Previous Entry Home Next Entry