Click to bookmark this page!

- Contact Me -
Include your email address

<< June 2005 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30


Just in case you weren't sure...
If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:

Please sign the Ted Kennedy Resignation Petition!


rss feed

Shameless Self-Promotion

Buy this book (not just because it contains two of my op-eds):
Americans on Politics, Policy, and Pop Culture:
The 101 Best Opinion Editorials From OpEds.com


An Interview With the G-Man:
My first (hopefully not last) experience in live radio, being interviewed by G. Gordon Liddy!



Perspective
Joe Mariani

Number of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships by precision use of American military force under George W. Bush:
50 million in just two years

Number of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships by anti-American Bush-bashing terrorist-appeasing whining elitists:
Zero. Ever.
...

The problem seems to me to be the definition of "free speech". Liberals define it as anything they want to say or do that opposes America. I say "speech" ends where "action" begins. Once you pick up a gun for the enemy, throw a rock at a cop during a "peace" march, send money to a terrorist organisation, or travel to Baghdad to block an American JDAM with your ass, you have crossed the line from free speech to costly action.
...

Saying the War on Terror is all about al-Qaeda is like saying we should have fought the Japanese Naval Air Force after Pearl Harbor. Not the Japanese Navy, not the Japanese Army, not the Empire of Japan -- just the Naval Air Force.
...

Complaining about the "waste" when human embryos are destroyed instead of being used in medical experiments is a lot like going to a funeral and complaining about the waste of perfectly good meat.
...

Blaming CO2 for climate change is like blaming smoke for the fire. CO2 is largely a following, not a leading, indicator of a rise in temperature.
...

Cavalier's First Theorem:
Every time, Liberals will fight to protect the guilty and kill the innocent, while Conservatives will fight to protect the innocent and punish the guilty.

Cavalier's Second Theorem:
Liberals are just Socialists who want to be loved... then again, Socialists are just Communists who lack the courage of their convictions.

Cavalier's Third Theorem:
Any strongly moral, hawkish or pro-American statement by a Liberal will inevitably be followed by a "but."

Top News Headlines

Iraq Blogs

The Messopotamian
Iraq at a Glance
Iraq the Model
Hammorabi
Iraq & Iraqis
Nabil's Blog
Road of a Nation
The Sun of Iraq
Healing Iraq

Iraqi Bloggers Central

The Truth About Iraq
Liberating Iraq
Pictures from Iraq
The Iraqi Holocaust: a collection
Iraq's Mass Graves

Mudville Gazette:
News the media can't use

The Other Iraq:
The Iraq you never hear about in the MSM

Michael Yon - Online Magazine
Dispatches not filed from the Baghdad Hilton hot tub


United States Central Command


Humor

Infamous Monsters of Filmland

Day by Day: Chris Muir's witty comic strip with a political bent

The Ultimate War Simulation: Why does this scenario seem so familiar?

What Kind of Liberal Are You?
Save me the trouble of figuring out what kind of idiot you are

Blame Bush
Because Bush is to blame... for everything

Sacred Cow Burgers
Web Archive

Satirical Political Beliefs Test

Communists for Kerry

Cooper's Protester Guide

Fellowship 9/11: Sauron never attacked Rohan, Saruman did! Yet a small group of elitists convinced Middle-earth to divert resources from the real war to attack Mordor for personal gain.


Analysis

When Democrats Attack
Did prominent Democrats switch positions on Iraq just to attack President Bush for political gain? (See the updated list.)

Was Iraqi Freedom Justified?
An honest, step-by-step analysis of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq that Congress voted into law shows that it was.

Saddam's Philanthropy of Terror
Details of solid ties to organised international terrorism

How The Left Betrayed Iraq
by Naseer Flayih Hasan

Did We Botch The Occupation?
No, not of Iraq: of Germany. Read the media's take on how we "lost the peace" in 1946 and compare.

Debunking 8 Anti-War Myths About the Conflict in Iraq

Pictures from Hate Bush/Hate America/Hate Capitalism/Hate Israel/general wacko rallies
- by Zombie

Jihad Watch


2004 Election Links

Looosers: Sorry, Everybody!
Winners: You're Welcome, Everybody!


2008 Election

Peace Through Strength PAC


Duncan Hunter in 2008
official site



Click to join duncanhunterforpresident2008 at Yahoo! Groups

Useful Links

FamilyWishList
Share your wish list with friends and family

Virtual Tourist
Travel tips from real travelers

RemBot.com
Appointment calendar with email/wireless notification

PriceGrabber.com
Convenient comparison shopping


Reading Material

RightWingNews
The best right-wing news and commentary

GOP USA Commentary Corner

Men's News Daily
The New Media

OpinionEditorials.com
a project of Frontiers of Freedom

ChronWatch
SF Chronicle watchdog and conservative news

American Daily
Analysis with political and social commentary

The Conservative Voice
Conservative news and opinion

News By Us
...not news bias

IntellectualConservative.com
Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics

CommonConservative.com
Practical conservatism for the common man

USASentinel
Analysis, Commentary and Opinion on the Real World

PhillyFuture.org
Philly news and blogs


Now Reading

The Fatal Conceit:
The Errors of Socialism
by F. A. Hayek



Articles Previously Published at
Useless-Knowledge.com

- When Good Liberals Go Bad - 05/29/03
- How Stupid Do Democrats Think You Are? - 05/31/03
- Who Are These 'Rich' Getting Tax Cuts, Anyway? - 06/02/03
- How Can We Miss The Clintons If They Won't Go Away? - 06/04/03
- Whining of Mass Distraction: How To Discredit A President - 06/05/03
- Liberal "Rules" for Arguing - 06/10/03
- Liberalism: Curable or Terminal? - 06/14/03
- Filibustering Judges: Hijacking Presidential Powers? - 06/17/03
- Is Hamas Exempt from the War on Terror? - 06/22/03
- How Malleable Is The Constitution? - 06/26/03
- Rejecting Our Biological and Cultural Heritage - 06/30/03
- I Need Liberal Assistance, Now! - 07/02/03
- Bring Them On - 07/03/03
- We Need You Arrogant Warmongering Americans...Again - 07/09/03
- Much Ado About Nothing, Again - 07/13/03
- Double Standard: Blindly Blame Bush - 07/18/03
- Was WWII Also Unjustified? - 07/20/03
- Clinton Backing Bush? Don't Bet On It! - 07/24/03
- How To Be A Hypocritical Liberal - 07/28/03
- The Clinton Legacy: In Answer to Mr. Stensrud - 07/30/03
-What Is 'Good News' To Liberals? - 08/02/03
- Bush's Big Blunder - 08/06/03
- The Meaning of Right - Why I Supported the Iraq War - 08/10/03
- More Liberal "Rules" for Arguing - 08/14/03
- You Can Have Cary Grant; I'll Take John Wayne! - 08/19/03
- Where Is The ACLU When It's Actually Needed? - 08/25/03
- Who's Afraid Of The Big Bad Ten Commandments? - 08/28/03
- From The Weasels: Thanks For Nothing - 08/30/03
- The Liberal Superfriends - 09/02/03
- Liberal Superfriends 2: The Sequel - 09/05/03
- Saddam and 9/11: Connect the Dots - 09/08/03
- Throwing Away the Southern Vote - 11/02/03
- Libya: The First Domino Falls - 12/20/03
- Is the UN Playing Games with American Politics? - 03/04/04


Blogs to Browse

Across the Pond
AlphaPatriot
Arts for Democracy
Betsy's Page
Bill Karl
Blonde Sagacity
Bull Moose Strikes Back
Common Sense & Wonder
Conservative Pleasure
Dangerous Logic
DowneastBlog
ElectionProjection
Everything I Know Is Wrong
Freedom of Thought
Sally Girl
Korla Pundit
LogiPundit.com
MarkLevinFan
Mark Nicodemo
Michelle Malkin
Moonbattery
My Arse From My Elbow
QandO Blog
RadioBS.net
Rebel Rouser
RightThinkingGirl
Sally Girl
Samantha Burns
Semi-Intelligent Thoughts
Sighed Effects
Sister Toldjah
Stark Truth
Take A Stand Against Liberals
The Resplendent Mango
The Right Society
The YNC
Tom's Common Sense
Tom DeLay
Tomfoolery of the Highest Order
Trying to Grok
TS Right Dominion
Violent Daydreams
Watcher of Weasels
Word Around the Net
WuzzaDem.com



Locations of visitors to this page


Friday, June 10, 2005
The Howard and Hillary Show

Most people find Democratic Party Chairman Howard Dean's seemingly mad attacks of late hard to understand. He has called Republicans "evil," brain dead," "corrupt" and "liars." He has also said that Republicans are "not very friendly" people who "behave the same" and "look the same" and "never made an honest living in their lives." Trying to stir up racial and religious tensions (the bread-and-butter of Democrats), Dean also accused the GOP of being "a white Christian party," although he fits that description himself -- as do the other major leaders of that party, as well as most of the people they put in high positions when they're in power. In fact, it fits the majority of the country, too, 77.1% of Americans being white and 76.5% calling themselves Christians as of 2001. Certainly this "revelation" that he's a white Christian who looks like all other Republicans must have come as a surprise to party Chairman Ken Mehlman, who happens to be Jewish. It probably also came as a surprise to Condoleeza Rice, Elaine Chao, Carlos Gutierrez, Alberto Gonzales, Norman Mineta, Alphonso Jackson... and that's just a few members of Bush's current Cabinet.

Howard Dean was supposedly elected to his position due to his fabled fundraising skills. Although he did very well raising money over the internet for his failed 2004 presidential campaign, he has been unable to duplicate that success for his party as a whole. Through the end of April 2005, the DNC raised $18.2 million, while the much less vicious RNC fundraising attempts raised $42.6 million in the same time period. So what's Howard Dean doing -- is he really running around insulting three-fourths of the country, stirring up anger and hatred, and doing his best to sink his own party out of sheer malice? Why is he still the head of the DNC, if that's the case? There's actually a good reason for Howard Dean's hate-filled tirades: Hillary Clinton.

While Dean has been doling out red meat to the Liberal base with both hands, presumptive 2008 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton has been subtly shifting her position to the right on important issues. In an interview on WABC radio, she attacked the Bush administration's loose border policy. "I am, you know, adamantly against illegal immigrants," she said. Of course, this is a blatant lie, since she has co-sponsored plenty of bills designed to reward illegal immigrants for breaking our laws. She has also embraced pro-life advocates, telling abortion supporters that both sides of the debate should find common ground. This sudden shift is at odds with her 100% lifetime rating from NARAL (National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League), a stridently pro-abortion group. On issue after issue, Hillary is attempting to divorce herself from her Liberal record, in preparation for her presidential campaign. And Dean is giving her the room she needs to run to the right.

Howard Dean's job is to keep the anger- and fear-driven Liberal base from abandoning the Democratic party before 2008. That's got to be as difficult as herding cats. As long as he keeps pouring on the vitriol, playing to the far Left lunatics (known as the "Democratic wing of the Democratic party" to Deaniacs), they will stay on the plantation and vote as they're told. Hillary knows she needs the moderate Democrats in addition to as many moderate Republicans and others she can fool in order to win in 2008, but can't lose the loonies, either. She can't afford to let the party split, as they show every sign of doing. So she plays to the moderates as Dean keeps the base in line.

We'll just have to see how long they can keep up the song-and-dance act. The way Dean's been scaring the stalwarts in his own party, he may be forced to tone down the rhetoric before long. It's too bad for them that Vaudeville's dead.

UPDATE: It seems that Michael Goodwin of New York Daily News agrees with my take on Howard and Hillary working together.

Posted at Friday, June 10, 2005 by CavalierX

Bat One
June 11, 2005   12:33 AM PDT
 
Bravo! A stellar piece of analytical work. Dean plays "bad cop" to Hillary's later "good cop" or, if you prefer, Dean is cast as the ditzy Gracie Allen with Hillary playing the sage and sensible George Burns role (to use your own vaudevillian metaphor). In either case, we are "saved" from Dean's irrepressible irresponsibility by Hillary rational seriousness. Some act, indeed, when you can manage to dress up a Hillary Clinton to seem to be a reasonable "moderate."

Here's another take to consider. As the cliche goes: follow the money. And when one man's direct contributions alone amount to nearly $150 million, guess whose tune the band keeps playing? The recent spate of Democratic criticism of Dean by various prominent Dems is just so much smoke. This is exactly what Dean was hired for, after all. Certainly not the fundraising. Not with a "Sugar Daddy" with pockets the size of George Soros'. By going further and further "beyone the pale" Howard Dean only makes the rest of the Democrats look more and more sane and sensible by comparison.

Some act, indeed.

Whymrhymer
June 11, 2005   10:33 PM PDT
 
An excellent analysis of a "zany" situation. It won't be long before Dean leaves his current job for an "exciting new opportunity;" either that or he'll have to undergo an exorcism.
JM
June 12, 2005   11:43 AM PDT
 
>Dean is cast as the ditzy Gracie
>Allen with Hillary playing the sage
>and sensible George Burns role

Ha! "Say goodnight, Howie."

>Not with a "Sugar Daddy" with
>pockets the size of George Soros'.

Exactly so; Dean is playing to the MoveOn.org crowd to keep them from forming their own party.
JM
June 12, 2005   11:44 AM PDT
 
>he'll have to undergo an exorcism.

THAT I'd like to see.
 

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments




Previous Entry Home Next Entry