Click to bookmark this page!

- Contact Me -
Include your email address

<< January 2006 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
01 02 03 04 05 06 07
08 09 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31


Just in case you weren't sure...
If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:

Please sign the Ted Kennedy Resignation Petition!


rss feed

Shameless Self-Promotion

Buy this book (not just because it contains two of my op-eds):
Americans on Politics, Policy, and Pop Culture:
The 101 Best Opinion Editorials From OpEds.com


An Interview With the G-Man:
My first (hopefully not last) experience in live radio, being interviewed by G. Gordon Liddy!



Perspective
Joe Mariani

Number of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships by precision use of American military force under George W. Bush:
50 million in just two years

Number of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships by anti-American Bush-bashing terrorist-appeasing whining elitists:
Zero. Ever.
...

The problem seems to me to be the definition of "free speech". Liberals define it as anything they want to say or do that opposes America. I say "speech" ends where "action" begins. Once you pick up a gun for the enemy, throw a rock at a cop during a "peace" march, send money to a terrorist organisation, or travel to Baghdad to block an American JDAM with your ass, you have crossed the line from free speech to costly action.
...

Saying the War on Terror is all about al-Qaeda is like saying we should have fought the Japanese Naval Air Force after Pearl Harbor. Not the Japanese Navy, not the Japanese Army, not the Empire of Japan -- just the Naval Air Force.
...

Complaining about the "waste" when human embryos are destroyed instead of being used in medical experiments is a lot like going to a funeral and complaining about the waste of perfectly good meat.
...

Blaming CO2 for climate change is like blaming smoke for the fire. CO2 is largely a following, not a leading, indicator of a rise in temperature.
...

Cavalier's First Theorem:
Every time, Liberals will fight to protect the guilty and kill the innocent, while Conservatives will fight to protect the innocent and punish the guilty.

Cavalier's Second Theorem:
Liberals are just Socialists who want to be loved... then again, Socialists are just Communists who lack the courage of their convictions.

Cavalier's Third Theorem:
Any strongly moral, hawkish or pro-American statement by a Liberal will inevitably be followed by a "but."

Top News Headlines

Iraq Blogs

The Messopotamian
Iraq at a Glance
Iraq the Model
Hammorabi
Iraq & Iraqis
Nabil's Blog
Road of a Nation
The Sun of Iraq
Healing Iraq

Iraqi Bloggers Central

The Truth About Iraq
Liberating Iraq
Pictures from Iraq
The Iraqi Holocaust: a collection
Iraq's Mass Graves

Mudville Gazette:
News the media can't use

The Other Iraq:
The Iraq you never hear about in the MSM

Michael Yon - Online Magazine
Dispatches not filed from the Baghdad Hilton hot tub


United States Central Command


Humor

Infamous Monsters of Filmland

Day by Day: Chris Muir's witty comic strip with a political bent

The Ultimate War Simulation: Why does this scenario seem so familiar?

What Kind of Liberal Are You?
Save me the trouble of figuring out what kind of idiot you are

Blame Bush
Because Bush is to blame... for everything

Sacred Cow Burgers
Web Archive

Satirical Political Beliefs Test

Communists for Kerry

Cooper's Protester Guide

Fellowship 9/11: Sauron never attacked Rohan, Saruman did! Yet a small group of elitists convinced Middle-earth to divert resources from the real war to attack Mordor for personal gain.


Analysis

When Democrats Attack
Did prominent Democrats switch positions on Iraq just to attack President Bush for political gain? (See the updated list.)

Was Iraqi Freedom Justified?
An honest, step-by-step analysis of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq that Congress voted into law shows that it was.

Saddam's Philanthropy of Terror
Details of solid ties to organised international terrorism

How The Left Betrayed Iraq
by Naseer Flayih Hasan

Did We Botch The Occupation?
No, not of Iraq: of Germany. Read the media's take on how we "lost the peace" in 1946 and compare.

Debunking 8 Anti-War Myths About the Conflict in Iraq

Pictures from Hate Bush/Hate America/Hate Capitalism/Hate Israel/general wacko rallies
- by Zombie

Jihad Watch


2004 Election Links

Looosers: Sorry, Everybody!
Winners: You're Welcome, Everybody!


2008 Election

Peace Through Strength PAC


Duncan Hunter in 2008
official site



Click to join duncanhunterforpresident2008 at Yahoo! Groups

Useful Links

FamilyWishList
Share your wish list with friends and family

Virtual Tourist
Travel tips from real travelers

RemBot.com
Appointment calendar with email/wireless notification

PriceGrabber.com
Convenient comparison shopping


Reading Material

RightWingNews
The best right-wing news and commentary

GOP USA Commentary Corner

Men's News Daily
The New Media

OpinionEditorials.com
a project of Frontiers of Freedom

ChronWatch
SF Chronicle watchdog and conservative news

American Daily
Analysis with political and social commentary

The Conservative Voice
Conservative news and opinion

News By Us
...not news bias

IntellectualConservative.com
Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics

CommonConservative.com
Practical conservatism for the common man

USASentinel
Analysis, Commentary and Opinion on the Real World

PhillyFuture.org
Philly news and blogs


Now Reading

The Fatal Conceit:
The Errors of Socialism
by F. A. Hayek



Articles Previously Published at
Useless-Knowledge.com

- When Good Liberals Go Bad - 05/29/03
- How Stupid Do Democrats Think You Are? - 05/31/03
- Who Are These 'Rich' Getting Tax Cuts, Anyway? - 06/02/03
- How Can We Miss The Clintons If They Won't Go Away? - 06/04/03
- Whining of Mass Distraction: How To Discredit A President - 06/05/03
- Liberal "Rules" for Arguing - 06/10/03
- Liberalism: Curable or Terminal? - 06/14/03
- Filibustering Judges: Hijacking Presidential Powers? - 06/17/03
- Is Hamas Exempt from the War on Terror? - 06/22/03
- How Malleable Is The Constitution? - 06/26/03
- Rejecting Our Biological and Cultural Heritage - 06/30/03
- I Need Liberal Assistance, Now! - 07/02/03
- Bring Them On - 07/03/03
- We Need You Arrogant Warmongering Americans...Again - 07/09/03
- Much Ado About Nothing, Again - 07/13/03
- Double Standard: Blindly Blame Bush - 07/18/03
- Was WWII Also Unjustified? - 07/20/03
- Clinton Backing Bush? Don't Bet On It! - 07/24/03
- How To Be A Hypocritical Liberal - 07/28/03
- The Clinton Legacy: In Answer to Mr. Stensrud - 07/30/03
-What Is 'Good News' To Liberals? - 08/02/03
- Bush's Big Blunder - 08/06/03
- The Meaning of Right - Why I Supported the Iraq War - 08/10/03
- More Liberal "Rules" for Arguing - 08/14/03
- You Can Have Cary Grant; I'll Take John Wayne! - 08/19/03
- Where Is The ACLU When It's Actually Needed? - 08/25/03
- Who's Afraid Of The Big Bad Ten Commandments? - 08/28/03
- From The Weasels: Thanks For Nothing - 08/30/03
- The Liberal Superfriends - 09/02/03
- Liberal Superfriends 2: The Sequel - 09/05/03
- Saddam and 9/11: Connect the Dots - 09/08/03
- Throwing Away the Southern Vote - 11/02/03
- Libya: The First Domino Falls - 12/20/03
- Is the UN Playing Games with American Politics? - 03/04/04


Blogs to Browse

Across the Pond
AlphaPatriot
Arts for Democracy
Betsy's Page
Bill Karl
Blonde Sagacity
Bull Moose Strikes Back
Common Sense & Wonder
Conservative Pleasure
Dangerous Logic
DowneastBlog
ElectionProjection
Everything I Know Is Wrong
Freedom of Thought
Sally Girl
Korla Pundit
LogiPundit.com
MarkLevinFan
Mark Nicodemo
Michelle Malkin
Moonbattery
My Arse From My Elbow
QandO Blog
RadioBS.net
Rebel Rouser
RightThinkingGirl
Sally Girl
Samantha Burns
Semi-Intelligent Thoughts
Sighed Effects
Sister Toldjah
Stark Truth
Take A Stand Against Liberals
The Resplendent Mango
The Right Society
The YNC
Tom's Common Sense
Tom DeLay
Tomfoolery of the Highest Order
Trying to Grok
TS Right Dominion
Violent Daydreams
Watcher of Weasels
Word Around the Net
WuzzaDem.com



Locations of visitors to this page


Sunday, January 29, 2006
And the Palestinians Vote for Terror

For years, the Left has been telling us that the innocent, victimised Palestinian people (actually Egyptians and Jordanians) just want peace with those nasty bullies from Israel. Well, the Palestinians themselves finally got the chance to tell the world what they really want. A free and open election in the Palestinian territories has put an Iran-backed terrorist group in power, a group that has sworn to destroy Israel. How "peace-loving" is that?

The Fatah party openly favored negotiation with Israel leading to a two-state solution and an independent Palestine. Hamas, the largest and most influential Muslim fundamentalist movement in the Palestinian territories, entered the political fray with a platform based on the death of all Jews, and the utter destruction of Israel. Unfortunately, the party with peace talks and negotiation in mind was voted out due to corruption scandals and inability to keep order in the cities. That put the party with "a bomb on every bus" for a motto in control, to everyone's surprise.

Hamas is a terror group formed in 1987 to push for the eradication of Israel. An essential part of their ideology is that the Palestinian problem is religious, and therefore can never be solved by political compromise. They believe that the land "from the [Jordan] river to the sea" is consecrated to Islam. It cannot be given up, not even a part of it, especially not Jerusalem. Hamas is an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, the group of Arab fanatics that served as an arm of Nazi intelligence during WWII. Hamas now receives a majority of its funding from Iran, funneled through Hezbollah and other groups.

A December 2000 intelligence report, for instance, showed that Iran transferred $1,200,000 to Hamas's Qassam Brigades to support 'the Hamas military arm in Israel and encouraging suicide operations.' According to the Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center at the Center for Special Studies, Iranian support for Hamas and other terrorist organisations is widespread:

Findings related to the interrogation of prisoners captured and documents seized in Operation Defensive Shield show the existence of an institutionalized and systematic network for transferring large sums of money operated by Iran through the organizations under its auspices, which use the banking systems of Syria and the Palestinian territories. Interrogation of the prisoners and the seized documents reveal large-scale transfer of money from Syria and Lebanon to Islamic Jihad, Hamas, and indirectly also to the Fatah/al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades (in addition to funds received by Fatah from the Palestinian Authority). These funds were used to encourage murderous terror activities in the Palestinian territories and in Israel; carrying out these activities was a condition for transferring financial support to the terror operatives in the field.

The fact that Hamas runs soup kitchens and health clinics in the Palestinian territories doesn't make up for bombed-out buses and restaurants in Israel. Such community support is useful to terrorist groups needing good will from the populace, not evidence of pure civic-mindedness. Luckily, that's a lesson the terrorists in Iraq never managed to learn, or the (mostly Sunni) insurgents would not be starting to turn against them now.

So the Palestinian people elected Hamas to 74 of the 132 seats in their parliament. Must we treat Hamas as a legitimate political entity if they continue to carry out terrorist attacks? Of course not. President Bush has already warned Hamas that US aid to the Palestinian Authority depends on the cessation of terrorist attacks and the repudiation of their intention to destroy Israel. It was bad enough when the Palestinian government pretended to have no control over Hamas... now the Palestinian government is Hamas. 

Our tax dollars should not go to support Hamas or any other terror group... especially when they already have enough support from Iran. Our resolve to prevent Iran from building a nuclear device must be stronger than ever, now that Iran has a willing delivery system on Israel's doorstep. Israel's security fence may be their best protection from Palestinian terrorists armed with pipe bombs... but it won't stop a nuclear weapon.

Does this election mean, as many Liberals would like to claim, that democracy has failed and freedom in the Middle East is a pipe dream? Hardly. It merely drives home the lesson that open elections are not the sole component of democracy; that along with freedom comes responsibility. Choices do have consequences.

If Hamas renounces terrorism and behaves as a legitimate government, international repercussions will likely be few. The new government already faces the possibility of civil war within the Palestinian territory, as even members of the police force have stormed the parliament building in protest of the Hamas victory. Some Fatah party leaders have already resigned, either through fear of their constituents or refusal to work with Hamas. There isn't much hope for peace with Israel at this point. It seems as though Ariel Sharon's gamble of surrendering Gaza in the hope of buying peace isn't going to pan out, after all. On the other hand, at least we can all dispense with the fiction that the Palestinians want peace with Israel.

Demands for Mahmoud Abbas and the leaders of the Fatah party to resign will probably shift to calls for party reform in the near future, as even the most violent Palestinians prefer fighting Israel to fighting with their own government. With any luck, the Fatah party -- or another, reform-minded party -- can gain enough of a voice to prevent Hamas from declaring all-out war with Israel. That's a road that will lead to no good for anyone.

Posted at Sunday, January 29, 2006 by CavalierX

RA
January 31, 2006   04:48 PM PST
 
It is time for Israel to invoke the 50 to 1 policy. For every rocket or mortar the Palestinians launch into Israel they will receive 50 in return.

For every suicide bomber, Israel should launch 50 artillary shells into the bombers home town.

The Palestinians need far more suffering before they are willing to sue for peace.
d'Brit
February 13, 2006   02:19 AM PST
 
Israel won't do much of anything until Sharon dies and a new head of gov. is elected.

Whether the new leader has the cojones that Sharon did is problematic.

On the outside chance that the new leader does have the requisite anatomy...

When the attacks continue, as it increasing appears that they will, (Hamas has already stated that they won't stop Islamic Jihad's attacks)

The situation will have escalated to a state of war and thus Israel needs to issue an ultimatum.

That ultimatum being threefold; 1) Hamas has 24 hrs to publically abandon its charter calling for the destruction of Israel. 2) It must guarantee to end ALL attacks against Israel. 3) It also must enter into sincere negotiations, starting with recognizing Israels right to exist through publically acknowedging this before the UN.

If ANY of these conditions are not met, Israel will consider that a state of total war with the Palestinians exists and permanent expulsion of ALL muslims will begin from ALL Palestinian territories... The Palestinians will be forcibly removed in their entirety from Gaza, The West bank, Jerusalem and every enclave and, that territory will henceforth be part of Israeli and lost to the Palestinians for all time.

After the war and,once a treaty is finalized, Muslims will be allowed to visit Jerusalem in limited, tightly controled numbers.

Israel will also announce its own policy of mutual assurred destruction. If at any point in the future, a nuclear device is detonated upon Israeli soil, it will be considered an attack by ISLAM upon Israel AND that nuclear retaliation will immediately commence against EVERY major Muslim city in the ME, with Tehran first on the list.

There will be no discussion, or trying to assign responsibility, as the use of a nuclear device upon Israel will be de facto proof of willful negligence by ISLAM in keeping its fanatics under control.

That a nuclear attack upon a country of Israels' size is proof of genocidal intent and that a similiar response is warranted and necessary.

Hamas and the Palestinians will have reapt the whirlwind...
Namepaul b.
March 12, 2006   03:09 PM PST
 
Port deal:
I have to wonder,& & kinda doubt,that "we" totaly back'd out of the "port deal".
My employment has takin me to both the "Dundalk, & Seagrit ports, these are the jugular vain, of the country(2 of the ports in question).
For an Entity to purchase control of these ports would have not only the funds but world political power "far beyond that of mortal
men" (sorry,had to),( S)
I wonder, as to the reaction of the contry, If the powers that be didnt just put out a placebo, then quietly went ahead.(as has happen'd before).
On the otherhand,- You have more fingers.
(sorry had to do that to)
post script; I have personnaly witnessed a "shipping container,40'"
that was taken off a ship at sea & brought in to an inlet, & off loaded onto a truck,the driver of the truck prob. didnt know what it was(just
p/u what he was told to. ive always wondered wht was in it, & why it didnt enter through normal channels/customs.
oh well guess people at my station in life may never know what goes on behind closed doors,maybe just as well.
Thank you for this site, very informitive. pb.
Namepaul b.
March 12, 2006   03:13 PM PST
 
Hamas"
OooKaYYY; whomever cannot figure this group out, gets to be on Point for the mine field.
" Sun Tzu" was right, maybe we should listen. pb.
 

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments




Previous Entry Home Next Entry