 Click to bookmark this page!
- Contact Me - Include your email address
 Just in case you weren't sure...
Please sign the Ted Kennedy Resignation Petition!
Shameless Self-PromotionBuy this book (not just because it contains two of my op-eds):
Americans on Politics, Policy, and Pop Culture: The 101 Best Opinion Editorials From OpEds.com

An Interview With the G-Man:
My first (hopefully not last) experience in live radio, being interviewed by G. Gordon Liddy!
Perspective Joe
MarianiNumber
of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships
by precision use of American military force
under George W. Bush: 50
million in just two years
Number
of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships
by anti-American Bush-bashing
terrorist-appeasing whining elitists: Zero. Ever.
...The problem seems to
me to be the definition of "free speech".
Liberals define it as anything they want to say
or do that opposes America. I say "speech" ends
where "action" begins. Once you pick up a gun
for the enemy, throw a rock at a cop during a
"peace" march, send money to a terrorist
organisation, or travel to Baghdad to block an
American JDAM with your ass, you have crossed the line from free speech to costly action. ...
Saying the War on Terror is all about al-Qaeda is like saying we should have fought the Japanese Naval Air Force after Pearl Harbor. Not the Japanese Navy, not the Japanese Army, not the Empire of Japan -- just the Naval Air Force. ...
Cavalier's First Theorem: Every time, Liberals will fight to protect the guilty and kill the innocent, while Conservatives will fight to protect the innocent and punish the guilty.
Cavalier's Second Theorem: Liberals are just Socialists who want to be loved... then again, Socialists are just Communists who lack the courage of their convictions.
Cavalier's Third Theorem: Any strongly moral, hawkish or pro-American statement by a Liberal will inevitably be followed by a "but."
Top News Headlines
Iraq
Blogs
The Messopotamian Iraq at a Glance Iraq the Model
Hammorabi Iraq & Iraqis Nabil's Blog Road of a Nation The Sun of Iraq
Healing Iraq
Iraqi Bloggers Central
The Truth About Iraq Liberating Iraq
Pictures from Iraq The Iraqi Holocaust: a collection
Iraq's Mass Graves
Mudville Gazette: News the media can't use
The Other Iraq: The Iraq you never hear about in the MSM
Michael Yon - Online Magazine Dispatches not filed from the Baghdad Hilton hot tub
 United States Central Command
Humor
Infamous Monsters of Filmland
Day by Day:
Chris Muir's witty comic strip with a political
bent
The Ultimate War Simulation: Why does this scenario seem so familiar?
What Kind of Liberal Are You? Save me the trouble
of figuring out what kind of idiot you
are
Blame
Bush Because Bush is to blame... for
everything
Sacred Cow Burgers Web Archive
Satirical Political Beliefs
Test
Communists for Kerry
Cooper's Protester Guide
Fellowship 9/11: Sauron never attacked Rohan, Saruman did! Yet a small group of elitists convinced Middle-earth to divert resources from the real war to attack Mordor for personal gain.
Analysis
When Democrats Attack Did prominent Democrats switch positions on Iraq just to attack President Bush for political gain? (See the updated list.)
Was Iraqi Freedom Justified? An honest, step-by-step analysis of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq that Congress voted into law shows that it was.
Saddam's Philanthropy of Terror Details of solid ties to organised international terrorism
How The Left Betrayed Iraq by Naseer Flayih Hasan
Did We Botch The
Occupation? No, not of Iraq: of Germany. Read the
media's take on how we "lost the peace" in 1946
and compare.
Debunking 8 Anti-War Myths About the Conflict in Iraq
Pictures from Hate
Bush/Hate America/Hate Capitalism/Hate
Israel/general wacko rallies - by
Zombie
Jihad Watch
2004 Election Links
Looosers: Sorry, Everybody!
Winners: You're Welcome, Everybody!
2008 ElectionPeace Through Strength PAC Duncan Hunter in 2008 official site
Click to join duncanhunterforpresident2008 at Yahoo! Groups
Useful Links
FamilyWishList Share your wish list with friends and family
Virtual Tourist Travel tips from real travelers
RememberIt.com Appointment calendar with email/wireless notification
PriceGrabber.com Convenient comparison shopping
Reading
MaterialRightWingNews
The best right-wing news and commentary
GOP USA Commentary
Corner
Men's News Daily The New Media
OpinionEditorials.com a project of Frontiers of Freedom
ChronWatch SF Chronicle watchdog and conservative news
American Daily Analysis with political and social commentary
The Conservative Voice Conservative news and opinion
News By Us ...not news bias
IntellectualConservative.com Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics
CommonConservative.com Practical conservatism for the common man
USASentinel Analysis, Commentary and Opinion on the Real World
PhillyFuture.org Philly news and blogs
Now ReadingThe Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism by F. A. Hayek

Articles Previously Published at
Useless-Knowledge.com
- When Good Liberals Go
Bad - 05/29/03 - How Stupid Do Democrats Think You
Are? - 05/31/03 - Who Are These 'Rich' Getting Tax
Cuts, Anyway? - 06/02/03 - How Can We Miss The Clintons If
They Won't Go Away? - 06/04/03 -
Whining of Mass Distraction: How
To Discredit A President -
06/05/03 - Liberal "Rules" for Arguing
- 06/10/03 - Liberalism: Curable or
Terminal? - 06/14/03 - Filibustering Judges: Hijacking
Presidential Powers? - 06/17/03 -
Is Hamas Exempt from the War on
Terror? - 06/22/03 - How Malleable Is The
Constitution? - 06/26/03 - Rejecting Our Biological and
Cultural Heritage - 06/30/03 - I Need Liberal Assistance,
Now! - 07/02/03 - Bring Them On -
07/03/03 - We Need You Arrogant Warmongering
Americans...Again - 07/09/03 - Much Ado About Nothing, Again
- 07/13/03 - Double Standard: Blindly Blame
Bush - 07/18/03 - Was WWII Also Unjustified?
- 07/20/03 - Clinton Backing Bush? Don't Bet On
It! - 07/24/03 - How To Be A Hypocritical
Liberal - 07/28/03 - The Clinton Legacy: In Answer to
Mr. Stensrud - 07/30/03 -What Is 'Good News' To
Liberals? - 08/02/03 - Bush's Big Blunder -
08/06/03 - The Meaning of Right - Why I
Supported the Iraq War -
08/10/03 - More Liberal "Rules" for
Arguing - 08/14/03 - You Can Have Cary Grant; I'll Take
John Wayne! - 08/19/03 - Where Is The ACLU When It's
Actually Needed? - 08/25/03 - Who's Afraid Of The Big Bad Ten
Commandments? - 08/28/03 - From The Weasels: Thanks For
Nothing - 08/30/03 - The Liberal
Superfriends - 09/02/03 - Liberal Superfriends 2: The
Sequel - 09/05/03 - Saddam and 9/11: Connect the
Dots - 09/08/03 - Throwing Away the Southern
Vote - 11/02/03 - Libya: The First Domino
Falls - 12/20/03 - Is the UN Playing Games with
American Politics? - 03/04/04
Blogs to Browse
Across the Pond
AlphaPatriot
Arts for Democracy
Betsy's Page
Bill Karl
Blonde Sagacity
Bull Moose Strikes Back
Common Sense & Wonder
Conservative Pleasure
Dangerous Logic
DowneastBlog
ElectionProjection
Everything I Know Is Wrong
Freedom of Thought
Sally Girl
Korla Pundit
LogiPundit.com
MarkLevinFan
Mark Nicodemo
Michelle Malkin
Moonbattery
My Arse From My Elbow
QandO Blog
RadioBS.net
Rebel Rouser
RightThinkingGirl
Sally Girl
Samantha Burns
Semi-Intelligent Thoughts
Sighed Effects
Sister Toldjah
Stark Truth
Take A Stand Against Liberals
The Resplendent Mango
The Right Society
The YNC
Tom's Common Sense
Tom DeLay
Tomfoolery of the Highest Order
Trying to Grok
TS Right Dominion
Violent Daydreams
Watcher of Weasels
Word Around the Net
WuzzaDem.com
|
|
|
 |
|
Monday, April 03, 2006
The Effects of Amnesty
For the sake of discussion, let's leave aside the question of whether it's right to reward lawbreakers by allowing them to stay, while those who follow the rules must wait permission to come here. What will be the effect of creating a "path to citizenship" for the estimated 10-12 million illegal aliens in America? How will that affect our economy and culture? It seems that most people advocating amnesty -- whatever they call it to soften the blow -- refuse to look at the consequences. It's worth the risk of being called "anti-immigrant" to examine the real impact of absorbing so many people at once. The Senate may pass the McCain-Kennedy "comprehensive" bill that includes giving legal status to illegal immigrants already in the US. President Bush also speaks of a "comprehensive" bill to solve the problem. The number of "sudden citizens" is sure to skyrocket between the time a bill is passed and the time any security measures it includes are implemented. That's why security must be increased and the border closed to further illegal immigration before Congress considers any other aspect of the issue. Even if the final version of the bill mandates building a second Great Wall of China on our southern border, by the time the first stone is placed it will already be too late. If an amnesty is passed before border security is addressed, the result will be a tidal wave of humanity rushing to bypass the immigration process. If you think illegal immigration is a problem now, just wait until millions more walk, run, crawl, drive, swim and dig their way inside our borders. If there is no real penalty for being in the US illegally, there's no reason for people to wait years for permission to come here. In fact, amnesty would make anyone who obeys the law look like a fool. The moment illegal workers are given any sort of legal status, prices will rise just as surely as though they were all deported. Employers will no longer be able to pay illegals low wages. Even then, the majority of former illegals will continue to take low-paying jobs, which will have a direct impact on the number of jobs available to other Americans. Unemployment rates will escalate. Those who earn low wages don't pay income taxes, which punctures the argument that America would benefit by way of increased tax revenue. Instead, demand for government services from the formerly illegal immigrants will increase dramatically, from schooling to unemployment to welfare and Social Security. I can't imagine Congress voting down a bill extending Social Security or Medicare benefits to the elderly who, having been illegal, never paid into the system. Politicians who lack the backbone to enforce our immigration laws for fear of losing Hispanic votes would certainly pass such a bill for the same reason. In fact, the "Hispanic lobby" may become the most powerful group in Washington. Millions of new voters will cause an orgy of pandering across the nation. Democrats, of course, will campaign based on whatever goodies they can offer the new voters on the public dime. Republicans will appeal to their mostly Catholic background, reminding them that Democrats generally favor abortion, gay "marriage" and other issues that generally irritate the religious. Every bill introduced in Congress for the next ten years will contain some kind of pork specifically aimed at Hispanics... or perhaps we should call it "puerco."
The question of whether millions of sudden citizens will become assimilated into American culture is moot. Political correctness prevents us from assimilating anyone anymore. Members of every ethnic and racial group are encouraged to cling to their separate identities rather than consider themselves Americans. No one who has seen illegal immigrants marching with Mexican flags and banners reading "This Is Stolen Land" and "This Is Our Continent, Not Yours" can possibly wonder whether illegal immigrants think of themselves as Americans. (Hint: no.) Before long, we'll be treated to Hispanic versions of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton -- people who gain power and money from inciting racial tensions.
Multiculturalism (or self-segregation) plus expectations of government largesse plus race-baiting attention seekers is a certain recipe for problems such as the Parisian riots of last November. There, angry young Muslims who identified with racial and religious groups instead of their country rioted for weeks. If we simply hand illegal immigrants citizenship without some effort at assimilation, the next march of 500,000 we face won't be so peaceful.
Posted at Monday, April 03, 2006 by CavalierX
 | Posted by Skye @ 04/04/2006 07:47 PM PDT |  |
I don't know what is worse, the pandering by Dems or open borders?
Yet another excellent analysis. Well done, Cav!
----------------------------------------
Millions of new voters will cause an orgy of pandering across the nation. Democrats, of course, will campaign based on whatever goodies they can offer the new voters on the public dime. |  |
  | Posted by ActionAmerica @ 04/05/2006 11:04 PM PDT |  | D@#%! I wish that I had said that.
This article actually puts the whole immigration issue into complete perspective. This should be required reading for all of the members of the Senate (and the House, too, for that matter). There is nothing else to be said. |  |
  | Posted by jimmy @ 04/10/2006 05:13 AM PDT |  | | this is the worst analysis ever. Many say this country was founded by immigrants seeking out a better life for themselves and their families. A secure future without damnation. If asked what has change about that, from then to now, I'd say: NOTHING. It is a basic HUMAN RIGHT to want seize the opportunity at a better life much like our founding fathers. It is crazy to think that illegal immigrants steal american jobs. President Bush said "we want them to come here legally to do the jobs americans wont do." Is he suggesting that americans are too good for janitorial work!? Perhaps. Instead of worrying about this immigration issue, we should be focused on the things unfinished: Iraq War (aka war on terror bull), stabilizing Social Security for retirement, and Education among other things. Illegal immigrants cleaned up Ground Zero in 01, they built this country from its foundations during the colonization of north american, to make the great USA the Empire it is today. At least then we were slaves...now we're felons. |  |
  | Posted by JM @ 04/10/2006 08:56 AM PDT |  | >this country was founded by
>immigrants
Do you understand the difference betwen legal and illegal immigrants, or is that too sophisticated for you?
>It is a basic HUMAN RIGHT to
>want seize the opportunity
It is not a basic human right, however, to violate our laws.
>It is crazy to think that illegal
>immigrants steal american jobs.
They are willing to work for far less than legal immigrants or Americans, so they drive down wages to the point where Americans and legal immigrants can't afford to take those jobs. I really can't explain it more simply than that.
>Iraq War (aka war on terror bull),
Your mean there's no such thing as terrorists?
>they built this country
No, that was legal immigrants. Still can't tell the difference between legal and illegal, huh? How about I steal your car. Is it mine legally, or illegally?
>At least then we were
>slaves...now we're felons.
Slaves did not choose to come here, and did not voluntarily break our laws in order to do so. Please don't demean and minimise the entire Civil Rights struggle by comparing slaves to voluntary criminals. |  |
  | Posted by JM @ 04/10/2006 09:53 AM PDT |  | By the way, Jimmy, here's a concrete example of American workers being removed from a job site when illegals showed up:
An Alabama employment agency that sent 70 laborers and construction workers to job sites in that state in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina says the men were sent home after just two weeks on the job by employers who told them "the Mexicans had arrived" and were willing to work for less.
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20060410-123506-1297r.htm |  |
  | Posted by Jacqueline Bowns @ 04/11/2006 03:56 PM PDT |  | | Absolutely no amnesty for ILLEGAL aliens. They're not obeying the laws now, what would make them obey then? |  |
  | Posted by TCM @ 04/27/2006 06:37 AM PDT |  | "Members of every ethnic and racial group are encouraged to cling to their separate identities rather than consider themselves Americans."
More power to you, Cav. This single, concise sentence is the most elegant and insightful description in decades of the bizarre, sugar-coated racism that is political correctness. Rather than uniting all Americans under one banner, this sort of well-intentioned Liberal short-sightedness only ensures that a member of any ethnic group will go through life feeling ostracized and with a chip on his shoulder. |  |
|
|
|