Click to bookmark this page!

- Contact Me -
Include your email address

<< April 2006 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01
02 03 04 05 06 07 08
09 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30


Just in case you weren't sure...
If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:

Please sign the Ted Kennedy Resignation Petition!


rss feed

Shameless Self-Promotion

Buy this book (not just because it contains two of my op-eds):
Americans on Politics, Policy, and Pop Culture:
The 101 Best Opinion Editorials From OpEds.com


An Interview With the G-Man:
My first (hopefully not last) experience in live radio, being interviewed by G. Gordon Liddy!



Perspective
Joe Mariani

Number of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships by precision use of American military force under George W. Bush:
50 million in just two years

Number of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships by anti-American Bush-bashing terrorist-appeasing whining elitists:
Zero. Ever.
...

The problem seems to me to be the definition of "free speech". Liberals define it as anything they want to say or do that opposes America. I say "speech" ends where "action" begins. Once you pick up a gun for the enemy, throw a rock at a cop during a "peace" march, send money to a terrorist organisation, or travel to Baghdad to block an American JDAM with your ass, you have crossed the line from free speech to costly action.
...

Saying the War on Terror is all about al-Qaeda is like saying we should have fought the Japanese Naval Air Force after Pearl Harbor. Not the Japanese Navy, not the Japanese Army, not the Empire of Japan -- just the Naval Air Force.
...

Complaining about the "waste" when human embryos are destroyed instead of being used in medical experiments is a lot like going to a funeral and complaining about the waste of perfectly good meat.
...

Blaming CO2 for climate change is like blaming smoke for the fire. CO2 is largely a following, not a leading, indicator of a rise in temperature.
...

Cavalier's First Theorem:
Every time, Liberals will fight to protect the guilty and kill the innocent, while Conservatives will fight to protect the innocent and punish the guilty.

Cavalier's Second Theorem:
Liberals are just Socialists who want to be loved... then again, Socialists are just Communists who lack the courage of their convictions.

Cavalier's Third Theorem:
Any strongly moral, hawkish or pro-American statement by a Liberal will inevitably be followed by a "but."

Top News Headlines

Iraq Blogs

The Messopotamian
Iraq at a Glance
Iraq the Model
Hammorabi
Iraq & Iraqis
Nabil's Blog
Road of a Nation
The Sun of Iraq
Healing Iraq

Iraqi Bloggers Central

The Truth About Iraq
Liberating Iraq
Pictures from Iraq
The Iraqi Holocaust: a collection
Iraq's Mass Graves

Mudville Gazette:
News the media can't use

The Other Iraq:
The Iraq you never hear about in the MSM

Michael Yon - Online Magazine
Dispatches not filed from the Baghdad Hilton hot tub


United States Central Command


Humor

Infamous Monsters of Filmland

Day by Day: Chris Muir's witty comic strip with a political bent

The Ultimate War Simulation: Why does this scenario seem so familiar?

What Kind of Liberal Are You?
Save me the trouble of figuring out what kind of idiot you are

Blame Bush
Because Bush is to blame... for everything

Sacred Cow Burgers
Web Archive

Satirical Political Beliefs Test

Communists for Kerry

Cooper's Protester Guide

Fellowship 9/11: Sauron never attacked Rohan, Saruman did! Yet a small group of elitists convinced Middle-earth to divert resources from the real war to attack Mordor for personal gain.


Analysis

When Democrats Attack
Did prominent Democrats switch positions on Iraq just to attack President Bush for political gain? (See the updated list.)

Was Iraqi Freedom Justified?
An honest, step-by-step analysis of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq that Congress voted into law shows that it was.

Saddam's Philanthropy of Terror
Details of solid ties to organised international terrorism

How The Left Betrayed Iraq
by Naseer Flayih Hasan

Did We Botch The Occupation?
No, not of Iraq: of Germany. Read the media's take on how we "lost the peace" in 1946 and compare.

Debunking 8 Anti-War Myths About the Conflict in Iraq

Pictures from Hate Bush/Hate America/Hate Capitalism/Hate Israel/general wacko rallies
- by Zombie

Jihad Watch


2004 Election Links

Looosers: Sorry, Everybody!
Winners: You're Welcome, Everybody!


2008 Election

Peace Through Strength PAC


Duncan Hunter in 2008
official site



Click to join duncanhunterforpresident2008 at Yahoo! Groups

Useful Links

FamilyWishList
Share your wish list with friends and family

Virtual Tourist
Travel tips from real travelers

RemBot.com
Appointment calendar with email/wireless notification

PriceGrabber.com
Convenient comparison shopping


Reading Material

RightWingNews
The best right-wing news and commentary

GOP USA Commentary Corner

Men's News Daily
The New Media

OpinionEditorials.com
a project of Frontiers of Freedom

ChronWatch
SF Chronicle watchdog and conservative news

American Daily
Analysis with political and social commentary

The Conservative Voice
Conservative news and opinion

News By Us
...not news bias

IntellectualConservative.com
Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics

CommonConservative.com
Practical conservatism for the common man

USASentinel
Analysis, Commentary and Opinion on the Real World

PhillyFuture.org
Philly news and blogs


Now Reading

The Fatal Conceit:
The Errors of Socialism
by F. A. Hayek



Articles Previously Published at
Useless-Knowledge.com

- When Good Liberals Go Bad - 05/29/03
- How Stupid Do Democrats Think You Are? - 05/31/03
- Who Are These 'Rich' Getting Tax Cuts, Anyway? - 06/02/03
- How Can We Miss The Clintons If They Won't Go Away? - 06/04/03
- Whining of Mass Distraction: How To Discredit A President - 06/05/03
- Liberal "Rules" for Arguing - 06/10/03
- Liberalism: Curable or Terminal? - 06/14/03
- Filibustering Judges: Hijacking Presidential Powers? - 06/17/03
- Is Hamas Exempt from the War on Terror? - 06/22/03
- How Malleable Is The Constitution? - 06/26/03
- Rejecting Our Biological and Cultural Heritage - 06/30/03
- I Need Liberal Assistance, Now! - 07/02/03
- Bring Them On - 07/03/03
- We Need You Arrogant Warmongering Americans...Again - 07/09/03
- Much Ado About Nothing, Again - 07/13/03
- Double Standard: Blindly Blame Bush - 07/18/03
- Was WWII Also Unjustified? - 07/20/03
- Clinton Backing Bush? Don't Bet On It! - 07/24/03
- How To Be A Hypocritical Liberal - 07/28/03
- The Clinton Legacy: In Answer to Mr. Stensrud - 07/30/03
-What Is 'Good News' To Liberals? - 08/02/03
- Bush's Big Blunder - 08/06/03
- The Meaning of Right - Why I Supported the Iraq War - 08/10/03
- More Liberal "Rules" for Arguing - 08/14/03
- You Can Have Cary Grant; I'll Take John Wayne! - 08/19/03
- Where Is The ACLU When It's Actually Needed? - 08/25/03
- Who's Afraid Of The Big Bad Ten Commandments? - 08/28/03
- From The Weasels: Thanks For Nothing - 08/30/03
- The Liberal Superfriends - 09/02/03
- Liberal Superfriends 2: The Sequel - 09/05/03
- Saddam and 9/11: Connect the Dots - 09/08/03
- Throwing Away the Southern Vote - 11/02/03
- Libya: The First Domino Falls - 12/20/03
- Is the UN Playing Games with American Politics? - 03/04/04


Blogs to Browse

Across the Pond
AlphaPatriot
Arts for Democracy
Betsy's Page
Bill Karl
Blonde Sagacity
Bull Moose Strikes Back
Common Sense & Wonder
Conservative Pleasure
Dangerous Logic
DowneastBlog
ElectionProjection
Everything I Know Is Wrong
Freedom of Thought
Sally Girl
Korla Pundit
LogiPundit.com
MarkLevinFan
Mark Nicodemo
Michelle Malkin
Moonbattery
My Arse From My Elbow
QandO Blog
RadioBS.net
Rebel Rouser
RightThinkingGirl
Sally Girl
Samantha Burns
Semi-Intelligent Thoughts
Sighed Effects
Sister Toldjah
Stark Truth
Take A Stand Against Liberals
The Resplendent Mango
The Right Society
The YNC
Tom's Common Sense
Tom DeLay
Tomfoolery of the Highest Order
Trying to Grok
TS Right Dominion
Violent Daydreams
Watcher of Weasels
Word Around the Net
WuzzaDem.com



Locations of visitors to this page


Thursday, April 06, 2006
DeLay Takes One for the Team

The Left is celebrating Tom DeLay's (R-TX) resignation from Congress, but it's not quite the big win they want everyone to believe. In fact, by giving them what they wanted, DeLay just might have thrown a monkey wrench into the Democrats' entire 2006 campaign. They may have forced "the Hammer" to step down, but it was a Pyrrhic victory at best.

DeLay's resignation is the latest chapter in the increasing Democrat tendency to take politics to the courtroom. For many years, Liberals and Democrats have sought to gain through legal action what they couldn't get through legislation or vote. Judicial activism has become a serious epidemic in this country. Even the Supreme Court is not immune, inventing a Constitutional
"separation of Church and State" clause, a right to abortion and changing the definition of "public use" to allow local governments to transfer property from one private owner to another. When no one will vote your way, the Left have learned, just find a friendly judge. 

From the highest to the lowest, the legal system is being systematically abused to help the Left overturn votes they lose and destroy political opponents, often on trumped-up charges. Look at the way the Left tried to destroy Karl Rove, President Bush's advisor. Rove was openly accused of "outing" a secret agent as part of a vendetta against Joe Wilson. After dragging the entire Bush administration through the mud over the issue, it turned out that
no crime had, in fact, even been committed. The entire drama was orchestrated simply to embarrass President Bush and drive his poll numbers down. If only the Left could be induced to fight terrorists as hard as they do President Bush.

Tom DeLay was
indicted in Texas for a crime that didn't even exist at the time he was supposed to have committed it. District Attorney Ronnie Earle, who had been promising to find some way to "get" DeLay for years, had to bring the case before six grand juries before he could find one that would hand up an indictment. According to the Republican rules of the House, DeLay had to step down from his position as House Majority Leader if indicted for a crime, which was what the Left wanted. DeLay was one of the most effective Congressional leaders the Republicans ever had, able to shepherd bills through the House and deliver votes.

Having wounded DeLay, the Left smelled blood. Aside from President Bush, Tom DeLay has been the biggest and most persistent
focus of Left-wing hatred for years. Since, of course, Bush is not running for office in 2006, many Democrat-supporting groups have been using DeLay as the boogeyman around which they could rally support and bring in the money. The entire campaign theme of Nick Lampson, DeLay's opponent in the 2006 race, can be summed up as "DeLay is evil." Democrats all too often run political campaigns based on demonisation of opponents instead of issues.

DeLay took the wind out of Lampson's sails, as well as those of the entire Democratic party, by simply stepping aside. The Democrats had more or less nationalised the Texas race, bringing in donations from Hollywood celebrities and ultra-rich Liberals like George Soros (who backs MoveOn.org). The entire "culture of corruption" meme repeated ad nauseum by every Democrat who gets near a camera was focused on Tom Delay. Now the Democrats have no national theme to run on in 2006 except "let's get a majority in Congress so we can obstruct legislation, bug out of Iraq and impeach Bush." That's never going to work.

Whether you love him or hate him, you have to give Tom DeLay his due as a brilliant politician. By sacrificing himself, he has probably ensured that the Republicans retain a majority in both House and Senate in the 2006 elections. Of course, such a move would hardly be necessary if so many Republican politicians weren't almost indistinguishable from Democrats in their spending and legislation.

Posted at Thursday, April 06, 2006 by CavalierX

Dave
April 14, 2006   02:02 PM PDT
 
Delay for President (Newt VP) ?
David Michaels
April 19, 2006   02:44 PM PDT
 
Tom DeLay exemplifies everything that is wrong with the GOP.

What a bunch of arrogant a$$es!

I guess, as far as you are concerned, it is OK to bend the rules as long as it forwards your twisted agenda.
JM
April 19, 2006   02:49 PM PDT
 
>Tom DeLay exemplifies
>everything that is wrong with the
>GOP.

Meaning, of course, that he's not a Liberal. Nice to see how those who bill themselves as tolerant and intelligent can't tolerate those with different opinions, isn't it?

>I guess, as far as you are
>concerned, it is OK to bend the
>rules as long as it forwards your
>twisted agenda.

Got to admire the Liberal penchant for psychological projection. They're just so GOOD at it! "The end justifies the means" is about as Left as you can get.
 

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments




Previous Entry Home Next Entry