 Click to bookmark this page!
- Contact Me - Include your email address
 Just in case you weren't sure...
Please sign the Ted Kennedy Resignation Petition!
Shameless Self-PromotionBuy this book (not just because it contains two of my op-eds):
Americans on Politics, Policy, and Pop Culture: The 101 Best Opinion Editorials From OpEds.com

An Interview With the G-Man:
My first (hopefully not last) experience in live radio, being interviewed by G. Gordon Liddy!
Perspective Joe
MarianiNumber
of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships
by precision use of American military force
under George W. Bush: 50
million in just two years
Number
of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships
by anti-American Bush-bashing
terrorist-appeasing whining elitists: Zero. Ever.
...The problem seems to
me to be the definition of "free speech".
Liberals define it as anything they want to say
or do that opposes America. I say "speech" ends
where "action" begins. Once you pick up a gun
for the enemy, throw a rock at a cop during a
"peace" march, send money to a terrorist
organisation, or travel to Baghdad to block an
American JDAM with your ass, you have crossed the line from free speech to costly action. ...
Saying the War on Terror is all about al-Qaeda is like saying we should have fought the Japanese Naval Air Force after Pearl Harbor. Not the Japanese Navy, not the Japanese Army, not the Empire of Japan -- just the Naval Air Force. ...Complaining about the "waste" when human embryos are destroyed instead of being used in medical experiments is a lot like going to a funeral and complaining about the waste of perfectly good meat. ...
Cavalier's First Theorem: Every time, Liberals will fight to protect the guilty and kill the innocent, while Conservatives will fight to protect the innocent and punish the guilty.
Cavalier's Second Theorem: Liberals are just Socialists who want to be loved... then again, Socialists are just Communists who lack the courage of their convictions.
Cavalier's Third Theorem: Any strongly moral, hawkish or pro-American statement by a Liberal will inevitably be followed by a "but."
Top News Headlines
Iraq
Blogs
The Messopotamian Iraq at a Glance Iraq the Model
Hammorabi Iraq & Iraqis Nabil's Blog Road of a Nation The Sun of Iraq
Healing Iraq
Iraqi Bloggers Central
The Truth About Iraq Liberating Iraq
Pictures from Iraq The Iraqi Holocaust: a collection
Iraq's Mass Graves
Mudville Gazette: News the media can't use
The Other Iraq: The Iraq you never hear about in the MSM
Michael Yon - Online Magazine Dispatches not filed from the Baghdad Hilton hot tub
 United States Central Command
Humor
Infamous Monsters of Filmland
Day by Day:
Chris Muir's witty comic strip with a political
bent
The Ultimate War Simulation: Why does this scenario seem so familiar?
What Kind of Liberal Are You? Save me the trouble
of figuring out what kind of idiot you
are
Blame
Bush Because Bush is to blame... for
everything
Sacred Cow Burgers Web Archive
Satirical Political Beliefs
Test
Communists for Kerry
Cooper's Protester Guide
Fellowship 9/11: Sauron never attacked Rohan, Saruman did! Yet a small group of elitists convinced Middle-earth to divert resources from the real war to attack Mordor for personal gain.
Analysis
When Democrats Attack Did prominent Democrats switch positions on Iraq just to attack President Bush for political gain? (See the updated list.)
Was Iraqi Freedom Justified? An honest, step-by-step analysis of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq that Congress voted into law shows that it was.
Saddam's Philanthropy of Terror Details of solid ties to organised international terrorism
How The Left Betrayed Iraq by Naseer Flayih Hasan
Did We Botch The
Occupation? No, not of Iraq: of Germany. Read the
media's take on how we "lost the peace" in 1946
and compare.
Debunking 8 Anti-War Myths About the Conflict in Iraq
Pictures from Hate
Bush/Hate America/Hate Capitalism/Hate
Israel/general wacko rallies - by
Zombie
Jihad Watch
2004 Election Links
Looosers: Sorry, Everybody!
Winners: You're Welcome, Everybody!
2008 ElectionPeace Through Strength PAC Duncan Hunter in 2008 official site
Click to join duncanhunterforpresident2008 at Yahoo! Groups
Useful Links
FamilyWishList Share your wish list with friends and family
Virtual Tourist Travel tips from real travelers
RemBot.com Appointment calendar with email/wireless notification
PriceGrabber.com Convenient comparison shopping
Reading
MaterialRightWingNews
The best right-wing news and commentary
GOP USA Commentary
Corner
Men's News Daily The New Media
OpinionEditorials.com a project of Frontiers of Freedom
ChronWatch SF Chronicle watchdog and conservative news
American Daily Analysis with political and social commentary
The Conservative Voice Conservative news and opinion
News By Us ...not news bias
IntellectualConservative.com Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics
CommonConservative.com Practical conservatism for the common man
USASentinel Analysis, Commentary and Opinion on the Real World
PhillyFuture.org Philly news and blogs
Now ReadingThe Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism by F. A. Hayek

Articles Previously Published at
Useless-Knowledge.com
- When Good Liberals Go
Bad - 05/29/03 - How Stupid Do Democrats Think You
Are? - 05/31/03 - Who Are These 'Rich' Getting Tax
Cuts, Anyway? - 06/02/03 - How Can We Miss The Clintons If
They Won't Go Away? - 06/04/03 -
Whining of Mass Distraction: How
To Discredit A President -
06/05/03 - Liberal "Rules" for Arguing
- 06/10/03 - Liberalism: Curable or
Terminal? - 06/14/03 - Filibustering Judges: Hijacking
Presidential Powers? - 06/17/03 -
Is Hamas Exempt from the War on
Terror? - 06/22/03 - How Malleable Is The
Constitution? - 06/26/03 - Rejecting Our Biological and
Cultural Heritage - 06/30/03 - I Need Liberal Assistance,
Now! - 07/02/03 - Bring Them On -
07/03/03 - We Need You Arrogant Warmongering
Americans...Again - 07/09/03 - Much Ado About Nothing, Again
- 07/13/03 - Double Standard: Blindly Blame
Bush - 07/18/03 - Was WWII Also Unjustified?
- 07/20/03 - Clinton Backing Bush? Don't Bet On
It! - 07/24/03 - How To Be A Hypocritical
Liberal - 07/28/03 - The Clinton Legacy: In Answer to
Mr. Stensrud - 07/30/03 -What Is 'Good News' To
Liberals? - 08/02/03 - Bush's Big Blunder -
08/06/03 - The Meaning of Right - Why I
Supported the Iraq War -
08/10/03 - More Liberal "Rules" for
Arguing - 08/14/03 - You Can Have Cary Grant; I'll Take
John Wayne! - 08/19/03 - Where Is The ACLU When It's
Actually Needed? - 08/25/03 - Who's Afraid Of The Big Bad Ten
Commandments? - 08/28/03 - From The Weasels: Thanks For
Nothing - 08/30/03 - The Liberal
Superfriends - 09/02/03 - Liberal Superfriends 2: The
Sequel - 09/05/03 - Saddam and 9/11: Connect the
Dots - 09/08/03 - Throwing Away the Southern
Vote - 11/02/03 - Libya: The First Domino
Falls - 12/20/03 - Is the UN Playing Games with
American Politics? - 03/04/04
Blogs to Browse
Across the Pond
AlphaPatriot
Arts for Democracy
Betsy's Page
Bill Karl
Blonde Sagacity
Bull Moose Strikes Back
Common Sense & Wonder
Conservative Pleasure
Dangerous Logic
DowneastBlog
ElectionProjection
Everything I Know Is Wrong
Freedom of Thought
Sally Girl
Korla Pundit
LogiPundit.com
MarkLevinFan
Mark Nicodemo
Michelle Malkin
Moonbattery
My Arse From My Elbow
QandO Blog
RadioBS.net
Rebel Rouser
RightThinkingGirl
Sally Girl
Samantha Burns
Semi-Intelligent Thoughts
Sighed Effects
Sister Toldjah
Stark Truth
Take A Stand Against Liberals
The Resplendent Mango
The Right Society
The YNC
Tom's Common Sense
Tom DeLay
Tomfoolery of the Highest Order
Trying to Grok
TS Right Dominion
Violent Daydreams
Watcher of Weasels
Word Around the Net
WuzzaDem.com
|
|
|
 |
|
Saturday, October 07, 2006
Terrorist TV
The following is a copy of the email I sent to the Sci-Fi channel.
Last night, I watched the season premiere of Battlestar Galactica, and, I have to say, was thoroughly disgusted. The writers of the show have taken its previous anti-war, anti-Bush undertone to an entirely new level. The entire episode was nothing more than a justification of terrorism committed by some of the main characters, and I'm surprised and saddened that you would allow such a thing to air on your channel.
In the show, the humans who settled a new planet are now living under the Cylon occupation. Cylons control the human puppet government, and many of the main human characters have joined the "insurgency." They send people to perform "heroic" suicide bombings that kill innocent humans as well as Cylons, and shrug off the casualties as part of the war they're fighting. They murder humans who collaborate with the Cylons. The Cylons imprison innocent people for no good reason, often torturing them while the collaborators cover for the Cylons.
All of this is obviously meant to imitate and excuse the rhetoric and tactics used by the terrorists fighting our troops in Iraq. It's apparent that the show is a paean to groups like al-Qaeda in Iraq, and an appeal to excuse terrorism on the flimsy grounds that "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter." The writers attempt to create a state of moral equivalency between the show's characters and the terrorists who murder US troops, Iraqi police and military, and Iraqi civilians every day. In order to accept such a moral equivalence, however, one must first abandon one's moral values.
Moral equivalence demands that one forego all understanding of right and wrong, and suspend one's sense of morality. Without the capacity to judge between right and wrong, people -- whole societies -- become unable to act. Criminals go unpunished, and those in need of protection go unaided. For instance, without the moral capacity to call the current ethnic murders by the government-sponsored militia in Darfur "wrong" and "immoral," the United Nations is unable to act to stop them. Due to moral paralysis, hundreds of thousands of innocent people may die, as they did in Rwanda. Is reducing the viewer's capacity to judge between right and wrong by portraying the murder of innocents as justifiable the intended goal of the Sci-Fi channel?
I cannot watch this show any longer. In fact, as long as Battlestar Galactica is on the air, I will cease to watch the Sci-Fi channel altogether. Although it may not have much impact, I will urge everyone I know personally to do the same. I will urge everyone I know on the internet to do so, and ask them to ask their friends to do so as well. Moreover, I will send copies of this letter to those who advertise on the Sci-Fi channel, to let them know what their money is buying -- no longer merely good entertainment, but thinly-veiled justifications of terrorism.
Thank you for your time.
A former viewer UPDATE: Psycho Toddler put it so much more eloquently than I.
Posted at Saturday, October 07, 2006 by CavalierX
 |  |  | Name October 7, 2006 12:09 PM PDT
Good observation . I was thinking the same thing as I watched the show. Pity, I used to enjoy it , but now unfortunately I will no longer. |  |
  |  |  | SalGal October 7, 2006 06:37 PM PDT
Another poison pen pal... Go Cav! |  |
  |  |  | rightwingprof October 9, 2006 10:18 AM PDT
I think you're reading things into the show that aren't there. <a href="http://rightwingnation.com/index.php/2006/10/08/2172/">See here</a>. |  |
  |  |  | Jim October 9, 2006 12:26 PM PDT
Rightwingprof is a nutjob. After looking at his website, I want to ask...is "Birth of a Nation" just a film? People write things and make movies and TV shows for a reason. You don't have an episode like that without trying to glorify the bad guys. |  |
  |  |  | CavalierX October 10, 2006 05:34 AM PDT
>I think you're reading things into
>the show that aren't there.
Not at all.
"I think the allegory has moved on with us. The series deals with the aftermath of 9/11 and the war on terror, the Iraq war, the war in Afghanistan – it’s imbued with things that are more current, like liberty versus freedom. Security versus freedom. The ideas of how far a society is willing to go in order to safeguard its citizens, what happens in witch trials or how the does the judicial process become a witch trial? What does it mean when you have a prisoner and you put his head in a bucket and you tell him he’s going to drown to get information out of him? Those are things happening in the world and those are things that we tackled on Galactica. This is what we do. This show is about the experience we’re having right now and trying to view that experience through the prism of science fiction. Not necessarily to make it ripped from today’s headlines, but essentially to take the themes and ideas of what is happening in the world and put them in this format and examine them from a different light and perspective."
- Ron Moore, writer/producer of Battlestar Galactica
SFX Magazine interview, 10 May 2005 |  |
  |  |  | Irish Diablo October 11, 2006 11:10 AM PDT
The new Battlestar Galactica sucks big, hairy, dirty elephant balls! If making the Cylons human-looking wasn't bad enough, they made Starbuck a woman. WTF is that? The wirters, producers and the Sci-Fi channel should all burn in hell for that blasphemous piece of Bantha poodoo. |  |
  |  |  | psychotoddler October 18, 2006 12:22 PM PDT
Great post, great letter. Moral equivalence is again the main issue. This is a direct descendant of Political Correctness. If you are unable to acurately label things, you can't address them in an intelligent fashion.
Terrorism is reprehensible. But rebellion may not be. The Occupation of the Warsaw Ghetto was evil with no good intentions. The purpose of that occupation was to control the Jewish population so they could be gradually deported and murdered. Period. The uprising against it was admirable and totally correct.
To portray the Cylons as being the equivalents of the Nazis during WW2, but then compare those that fight against them to the Islamofascists who blow up civilians because they want to maintain their own rule of terror in the region and play to our press is flawed, and it tells me that the producers can't tell the difference between Nazis whose ultimate goal is genocide, and Americans, whose only interest in the region is altruistic and would be more than happy to get the hell out of there when the population can behave itself.
Nevertheless, I'm still not ready to abandon BSG. I think there's still room for hope. |  |
  |  |  | Christopher Taylor October 28, 2006 06:32 PM PDT
And here I thought the only reason the new Battlestar Galactica is because they turned it into a soap opera and got rid of the cool looking chrome Cylons |  |
|
|
|