Click to bookmark this page!

- Contact Me -
Include your email address

<< March 2007 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01 02 03
04 05 06 07 08 09 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31


Just in case you weren't sure...
If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:

Please sign the Ted Kennedy Resignation Petition!


rss feed

Shameless Self-Promotion

Buy this book (not just because it contains two of my op-eds):
Americans on Politics, Policy, and Pop Culture:
The 101 Best Opinion Editorials From OpEds.com


An Interview With the G-Man:
My first (hopefully not last) experience in live radio, being interviewed by G. Gordon Liddy!



Perspective
Joe Mariani

Number of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships by precision use of American military force under George W. Bush:
50 million in just two years

Number of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships by anti-American Bush-bashing terrorist-appeasing whining elitists:
Zero. Ever.
...

The problem seems to me to be the definition of "free speech". Liberals define it as anything they want to say or do that opposes America. I say "speech" ends where "action" begins. Once you pick up a gun for the enemy, throw a rock at a cop during a "peace" march, send money to a terrorist organisation, or travel to Baghdad to block an American JDAM with your ass, you have crossed the line from free speech to costly action.
...

Saying the War on Terror is all about al-Qaeda is like saying we should have fought the Japanese Naval Air Force after Pearl Harbor. Not the Japanese Navy, not the Japanese Army, not the Empire of Japan -- just the Naval Air Force.
...

Complaining about the "waste" when human embryos are destroyed instead of being used in medical experiments is a lot like going to a funeral and complaining about the waste of perfectly good meat.
...

Blaming CO2 for climate change is like blaming smoke for the fire. CO2 is largely a following, not a leading, indicator of a rise in temperature.
...

Cavalier's First Theorem:
Every time, Liberals will fight to protect the guilty and kill the innocent, while Conservatives will fight to protect the innocent and punish the guilty.

Cavalier's Second Theorem:
Liberals are just Socialists who want to be loved... then again, Socialists are just Communists who lack the courage of their convictions.

Cavalier's Third Theorem:
Any strongly moral, hawkish or pro-American statement by a Liberal will inevitably be followed by a "but."

Top News Headlines

Iraq Blogs

The Messopotamian
Iraq at a Glance
Iraq the Model
Hammorabi
Iraq & Iraqis
Nabil's Blog
Road of a Nation
The Sun of Iraq
Healing Iraq

Iraqi Bloggers Central

The Truth About Iraq
Liberating Iraq
Pictures from Iraq
The Iraqi Holocaust: a collection
Iraq's Mass Graves

Mudville Gazette:
News the media can't use

The Other Iraq:
The Iraq you never hear about in the MSM

Michael Yon - Online Magazine
Dispatches not filed from the Baghdad Hilton hot tub


United States Central Command


Humor

Infamous Monsters of Filmland

Day by Day: Chris Muir's witty comic strip with a political bent

The Ultimate War Simulation: Why does this scenario seem so familiar?

What Kind of Liberal Are You?
Save me the trouble of figuring out what kind of idiot you are

Blame Bush
Because Bush is to blame... for everything

Sacred Cow Burgers
Web Archive

Satirical Political Beliefs Test

Communists for Kerry

Cooper's Protester Guide

Fellowship 9/11: Sauron never attacked Rohan, Saruman did! Yet a small group of elitists convinced Middle-earth to divert resources from the real war to attack Mordor for personal gain.


Analysis

When Democrats Attack
Did prominent Democrats switch positions on Iraq just to attack President Bush for political gain? (See the updated list.)

Was Iraqi Freedom Justified?
An honest, step-by-step analysis of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq that Congress voted into law shows that it was.

Saddam's Philanthropy of Terror
Details of solid ties to organised international terrorism

How The Left Betrayed Iraq
by Naseer Flayih Hasan

Did We Botch The Occupation?
No, not of Iraq: of Germany. Read the media's take on how we "lost the peace" in 1946 and compare.

Debunking 8 Anti-War Myths About the Conflict in Iraq

Pictures from Hate Bush/Hate America/Hate Capitalism/Hate Israel/general wacko rallies
- by Zombie

Jihad Watch


2004 Election Links

Looosers: Sorry, Everybody!
Winners: You're Welcome, Everybody!


2008 Election

Peace Through Strength PAC


Duncan Hunter in 2008
official site



Click to join duncanhunterforpresident2008 at Yahoo! Groups

Useful Links

FamilyWishList
Share your wish list with friends and family

Virtual Tourist
Travel tips from real travelers

RemBot.com
Appointment calendar with email/wireless notification

PriceGrabber.com
Convenient comparison shopping


Reading Material

RightWingNews
The best right-wing news and commentary

GOP USA Commentary Corner

Men's News Daily
The New Media

OpinionEditorials.com
a project of Frontiers of Freedom

ChronWatch
SF Chronicle watchdog and conservative news

American Daily
Analysis with political and social commentary

The Conservative Voice
Conservative news and opinion

News By Us
...not news bias

IntellectualConservative.com
Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics

CommonConservative.com
Practical conservatism for the common man

USASentinel
Analysis, Commentary and Opinion on the Real World

PhillyFuture.org
Philly news and blogs


Now Reading

The Fatal Conceit:
The Errors of Socialism
by F. A. Hayek



Articles Previously Published at
Useless-Knowledge.com

- When Good Liberals Go Bad - 05/29/03
- How Stupid Do Democrats Think You Are? - 05/31/03
- Who Are These 'Rich' Getting Tax Cuts, Anyway? - 06/02/03
- How Can We Miss The Clintons If They Won't Go Away? - 06/04/03
- Whining of Mass Distraction: How To Discredit A President - 06/05/03
- Liberal "Rules" for Arguing - 06/10/03
- Liberalism: Curable or Terminal? - 06/14/03
- Filibustering Judges: Hijacking Presidential Powers? - 06/17/03
- Is Hamas Exempt from the War on Terror? - 06/22/03
- How Malleable Is The Constitution? - 06/26/03
- Rejecting Our Biological and Cultural Heritage - 06/30/03
- I Need Liberal Assistance, Now! - 07/02/03
- Bring Them On - 07/03/03
- We Need You Arrogant Warmongering Americans...Again - 07/09/03
- Much Ado About Nothing, Again - 07/13/03
- Double Standard: Blindly Blame Bush - 07/18/03
- Was WWII Also Unjustified? - 07/20/03
- Clinton Backing Bush? Don't Bet On It! - 07/24/03
- How To Be A Hypocritical Liberal - 07/28/03
- The Clinton Legacy: In Answer to Mr. Stensrud - 07/30/03
-What Is 'Good News' To Liberals? - 08/02/03
- Bush's Big Blunder - 08/06/03
- The Meaning of Right - Why I Supported the Iraq War - 08/10/03
- More Liberal "Rules" for Arguing - 08/14/03
- You Can Have Cary Grant; I'll Take John Wayne! - 08/19/03
- Where Is The ACLU When It's Actually Needed? - 08/25/03
- Who's Afraid Of The Big Bad Ten Commandments? - 08/28/03
- From The Weasels: Thanks For Nothing - 08/30/03
- The Liberal Superfriends - 09/02/03
- Liberal Superfriends 2: The Sequel - 09/05/03
- Saddam and 9/11: Connect the Dots - 09/08/03
- Throwing Away the Southern Vote - 11/02/03
- Libya: The First Domino Falls - 12/20/03
- Is the UN Playing Games with American Politics? - 03/04/04


Blogs to Browse

Across the Pond
AlphaPatriot
Arts for Democracy
Betsy's Page
Bill Karl
Blonde Sagacity
Bull Moose Strikes Back
Common Sense & Wonder
Conservative Pleasure
Dangerous Logic
DowneastBlog
ElectionProjection
Everything I Know Is Wrong
Freedom of Thought
Sally Girl
Korla Pundit
LogiPundit.com
MarkLevinFan
Mark Nicodemo
Michelle Malkin
Moonbattery
My Arse From My Elbow
QandO Blog
RadioBS.net
Rebel Rouser
RightThinkingGirl
Sally Girl
Samantha Burns
Semi-Intelligent Thoughts
Sighed Effects
Sister Toldjah
Stark Truth
Take A Stand Against Liberals
The Resplendent Mango
The Right Society
The YNC
Tom's Common Sense
Tom DeLay
Tomfoolery of the Highest Order
Trying to Grok
TS Right Dominion
Violent Daydreams
Watcher of Weasels
Word Around the Net
WuzzaDem.com



Locations of visitors to this page


Wednesday, March 28, 2007
The Iraq Surrender Act of 2007

Both House and Senate have now sent a clear message to the world: Osama bin Laden was right. America does not have the stomach for a fight. We cannot stand the sight of our own blood. Our allies, especially those in Iraq who are depending on us to help them stabilise their country, get the message loud and clear. So do our enemies, who now know that if they manage to hold on for another eighteen months, they will prevail. Worst of all, our troops get the message, too.

Democrats in the House amended a bill containing needed funding for the troops in Iraq and Afghanistan to include a specific withdrawal date for our troops in Iraq: the end of August 2008, regardless of circumstances. Members attached some $24 billion worth of pork, mostly designed to bribe specific Representatives who would otherwise not have voted in favor of the bill for various reasons. For instance, the bill contains $74 million for peanut storage, apparently a vital wartime concern. Spinach growers -- who contributed over $30,000 to the campaign of Rep. Sam Farr (D-CA) -- will receive $25 million to "offset losses from last fall's E. coli contamination" if the bill becomes law. Dairy interests -- who contributed $9,000 to Rep. David Obey's (D-WI) last campaign -- will receive $252 million. Now that's a return on investment! When asked whether the campaign contributions were a factor in the pork attachments, Obey said, "I represent dairy farmers. You got a problem with that?" Due to Speaker Nancy Pelosi's machinations, the bill passed 218-212.

The Senate version of the bill contains vital military spending like $16 million to build new offices for House members, $13 million for the Ewe Lamb Replacement and Retention Program and $5 million for fish breeders, all labeled "emergency spending."  It was thought that the bill would not get through the Senate with the withdrawal date included, but it passed with a vote of 50-48

If the President does not approve funding by mid-April, the military will begin to face severe hardships. Those hardships will be felt most keenly by our troops in the field, who will begin to run short of ammunition, armor, replacement parts and vehicles, food and medical supplies. It will become more difficult to replace the wounded and rotate troops out of combat. Therefore, the President must sign an appropriations bill by then.

On the other hand, setting a date for withdrawal is tantamount to national suicide. It sends the message that America is too weak to fight; that we can be beaten by terror tactics. If we leave Iraq before the people can protect themselves, the Iraqi experiment with democracy will succumb to Iranian control on one side and that of al-Qaeda on the other. Both will become far more powerful than they had previously dared to believe. With our defeat at the hands of a few thugs and bombers, we would deserve the opprobrium of every country on Earth, nor would any country hesitate to act against us. North Korea would build its nuclear arsenal unchecked, as would Iran. China's tenuous alliance with North Korea and Russia would become unbreakable. Pakistan would fall, and India would face a nuclear-armed radical Muslim regime without backing from the West. Europe's reluctant slide into Islamofascist domination would become a free-fall. Therefore, the President must not sign any bill that contains a timetable for withdrawal from Iraq.

There is only one thing for Bush to do. The President of the United States must go on strike.

If President Bush refuses to sign any bill, for any purpose, until a clean military funding bill reaches his desk, he can effectively shut down the federal government. Congress would be hamstrung, unable to pass any measure until the President once again picks up his pen. In the absence of an Executive branch, the Legislature has no function, and it's time the Chief Executive exercises his ability to rein in the excesses of this Democrat-controlled Congress. The Democrats may have taken over one branch of government, but they need to be reminded that Congress is not the whole of it.

It remains to be seen whether President Bush has the foresight and fortitude to make such a move. If he does not, he might as well pull our troops back from every corner of the world now, and we should all prepare for the worst the world can throw at us.

Hat tip to QandO blog for the pork list.

Posted at Wednesday, March 28, 2007 by CavalierX

Tom
March 30, 2007   06:36 PM PDT
 
And I think that Bush will just do that - refuse to sign anything that the Dems put through with a deadline attached to it.
JM
March 31, 2007   11:30 AM PDT
 
I think he ought to refuse to sign anything, period, until this is fixed. In fact, he ought to go on national tv during prime time and shred the damned bill, just to get the message across.
Brian
April 2, 2007   05:08 PM PDT
 
Call it what you want, but we did end the war a few years back if I recall correctly. Fighting a war on terrorism is like saying I'm fighting a war on the like of Chocolate. The longer we stay there, the further in debt we will fall.
JM
April 2, 2007   07:38 PM PDT
 
You should try paying attention, instead of spouting Liberal talking points and pretending to be concerned about fiscal considerations. First, The war against Iraq ended, and we are now fighting to help the new government establish itself. Second, unless you've been living under a rock, you know that the war on terror is shorthand for the war against terror groups of international reach and those who support, harbor, train and supply them, which is a pain to type over and over. I do have to thank you, though, for admitting that the fight in Iraq is part of it. Third, the fighting in Iraq has cost less than 2% of our GDP. The war on poverty has cost far more. How's that going for ya?
Psychic Ferret
April 2, 2007   09:37 PM PDT
 
"For instance, the bill contains $74 million for peanut storage, apparently a vital wartime concern."

The Dems need something to pay the troops, don't they?
SalGal
April 4, 2007   12:58 AM PDT
 
Didja hear Rush talking about Romney today? (G)
JM
April 4, 2007   02:40 AM PDT
 
No; I don't usually get near a radio during work hours.
nllucid
April 6, 2007   03:24 AM PDT
 
wow
 

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments




Previous Entry Home Next Entry