Click to bookmark this page!

- Contact Me -
Include your email address

<< January 2004 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01 02 03
04 05 06 07 08 09 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31


Just in case you weren't sure...
If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:

Please sign the Ted Kennedy Resignation Petition!


rss feed

Shameless Self-Promotion

Buy this book (not just because it contains two of my op-eds):
Americans on Politics, Policy, and Pop Culture:
The 101 Best Opinion Editorials From OpEds.com


An Interview With the G-Man:
My first (hopefully not last) experience in live radio, being interviewed by G. Gordon Liddy!



Perspective
Joe Mariani

Number of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships by precision use of American military force under George W. Bush:
50 million in just two years

Number of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships by anti-American Bush-bashing terrorist-appeasing whining elitists:
Zero. Ever.
...

The problem seems to me to be the definition of "free speech". Liberals define it as anything they want to say or do that opposes America. I say "speech" ends where "action" begins. Once you pick up a gun for the enemy, throw a rock at a cop during a "peace" march, send money to a terrorist organisation, or travel to Baghdad to block an American JDAM with your ass, you have crossed the line from free speech to costly action.
...

Saying the War on Terror is all about al-Qaeda is like saying we should have fought the Japanese Naval Air Force after Pearl Harbor. Not the Japanese Navy, not the Japanese Army, not the Empire of Japan -- just the Naval Air Force.
...

Complaining about the "waste" when human embryos are destroyed instead of being used in medical experiments is a lot like going to a funeral and complaining about the waste of perfectly good meat.
...

Blaming CO2 for climate change is like blaming smoke for the fire. CO2 is largely a following, not a leading, indicator of a rise in temperature.
...

Cavalier's First Theorem:
Every time, Liberals will fight to protect the guilty and kill the innocent, while Conservatives will fight to protect the innocent and punish the guilty.

Cavalier's Second Theorem:
Liberals are just Socialists who want to be loved... then again, Socialists are just Communists who lack the courage of their convictions.

Cavalier's Third Theorem:
Any strongly moral, hawkish or pro-American statement by a Liberal will inevitably be followed by a "but."

Top News Headlines

Iraq Blogs

The Messopotamian
Iraq at a Glance
Iraq the Model
Hammorabi
Iraq & Iraqis
Nabil's Blog
Road of a Nation
The Sun of Iraq
Healing Iraq

Iraqi Bloggers Central

The Truth About Iraq
Liberating Iraq
Pictures from Iraq
The Iraqi Holocaust: a collection
Iraq's Mass Graves

Mudville Gazette:
News the media can't use

The Other Iraq:
The Iraq you never hear about in the MSM

Michael Yon - Online Magazine
Dispatches not filed from the Baghdad Hilton hot tub


United States Central Command


Humor

Infamous Monsters of Filmland

Day by Day: Chris Muir's witty comic strip with a political bent

The Ultimate War Simulation: Why does this scenario seem so familiar?

What Kind of Liberal Are You?
Save me the trouble of figuring out what kind of idiot you are

Blame Bush
Because Bush is to blame... for everything

Sacred Cow Burgers
Web Archive

Satirical Political Beliefs Test

Communists for Kerry

Cooper's Protester Guide

Fellowship 9/11: Sauron never attacked Rohan, Saruman did! Yet a small group of elitists convinced Middle-earth to divert resources from the real war to attack Mordor for personal gain.


Analysis

When Democrats Attack
Did prominent Democrats switch positions on Iraq just to attack President Bush for political gain? (See the updated list.)

Was Iraqi Freedom Justified?
An honest, step-by-step analysis of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq that Congress voted into law shows that it was.

Saddam's Philanthropy of Terror
Details of solid ties to organised international terrorism

How The Left Betrayed Iraq
by Naseer Flayih Hasan

Did We Botch The Occupation?
No, not of Iraq: of Germany. Read the media's take on how we "lost the peace" in 1946 and compare.

Debunking 8 Anti-War Myths About the Conflict in Iraq

Pictures from Hate Bush/Hate America/Hate Capitalism/Hate Israel/general wacko rallies
- by Zombie

Jihad Watch


2004 Election Links

Looosers: Sorry, Everybody!
Winners: You're Welcome, Everybody!


2008 Election

Peace Through Strength PAC


Duncan Hunter in 2008
official site



Click to join duncanhunterforpresident2008 at Yahoo! Groups

Useful Links

FamilyWishList
Share your wish list with friends and family

Virtual Tourist
Travel tips from real travelers

RemBot.com
Appointment calendar with email/wireless notification

PriceGrabber.com
Convenient comparison shopping


Reading Material

RightWingNews
The best right-wing news and commentary

GOP USA Commentary Corner

Men's News Daily
The New Media

OpinionEditorials.com
a project of Frontiers of Freedom

ChronWatch
SF Chronicle watchdog and conservative news

American Daily
Analysis with political and social commentary

The Conservative Voice
Conservative news and opinion

News By Us
...not news bias

IntellectualConservative.com
Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics

CommonConservative.com
Practical conservatism for the common man

USASentinel
Analysis, Commentary and Opinion on the Real World

PhillyFuture.org
Philly news and blogs


Now Reading

The Fatal Conceit:
The Errors of Socialism
by F. A. Hayek



Articles Previously Published at
Useless-Knowledge.com

- When Good Liberals Go Bad - 05/29/03
- How Stupid Do Democrats Think You Are? - 05/31/03
- Who Are These 'Rich' Getting Tax Cuts, Anyway? - 06/02/03
- How Can We Miss The Clintons If They Won't Go Away? - 06/04/03
- Whining of Mass Distraction: How To Discredit A President - 06/05/03
- Liberal "Rules" for Arguing - 06/10/03
- Liberalism: Curable or Terminal? - 06/14/03
- Filibustering Judges: Hijacking Presidential Powers? - 06/17/03
- Is Hamas Exempt from the War on Terror? - 06/22/03
- How Malleable Is The Constitution? - 06/26/03
- Rejecting Our Biological and Cultural Heritage - 06/30/03
- I Need Liberal Assistance, Now! - 07/02/03
- Bring Them On - 07/03/03
- We Need You Arrogant Warmongering Americans...Again - 07/09/03
- Much Ado About Nothing, Again - 07/13/03
- Double Standard: Blindly Blame Bush - 07/18/03
- Was WWII Also Unjustified? - 07/20/03
- Clinton Backing Bush? Don't Bet On It! - 07/24/03
- How To Be A Hypocritical Liberal - 07/28/03
- The Clinton Legacy: In Answer to Mr. Stensrud - 07/30/03
-What Is 'Good News' To Liberals? - 08/02/03
- Bush's Big Blunder - 08/06/03
- The Meaning of Right - Why I Supported the Iraq War - 08/10/03
- More Liberal "Rules" for Arguing - 08/14/03
- You Can Have Cary Grant; I'll Take John Wayne! - 08/19/03
- Where Is The ACLU When It's Actually Needed? - 08/25/03
- Who's Afraid Of The Big Bad Ten Commandments? - 08/28/03
- From The Weasels: Thanks For Nothing - 08/30/03
- The Liberal Superfriends - 09/02/03
- Liberal Superfriends 2: The Sequel - 09/05/03
- Saddam and 9/11: Connect the Dots - 09/08/03
- Throwing Away the Southern Vote - 11/02/03
- Libya: The First Domino Falls - 12/20/03
- Is the UN Playing Games with American Politics? - 03/04/04


Blogs to Browse

Across the Pond
AlphaPatriot
Arts for Democracy
Betsy's Page
Bill Karl
Blonde Sagacity
Bull Moose Strikes Back
Common Sense & Wonder
Conservative Pleasure
Dangerous Logic
DowneastBlog
ElectionProjection
Everything I Know Is Wrong
Freedom of Thought
Sally Girl
Korla Pundit
LogiPundit.com
MarkLevinFan
Mark Nicodemo
Michelle Malkin
Moonbattery
My Arse From My Elbow
QandO Blog
RadioBS.net
Rebel Rouser
RightThinkingGirl
Sally Girl
Samantha Burns
Semi-Intelligent Thoughts
Sighed Effects
Sister Toldjah
Stark Truth
Take A Stand Against Liberals
The Resplendent Mango
The Right Society
The YNC
Tom's Common Sense
Tom DeLay
Tomfoolery of the Highest Order
Trying to Grok
TS Right Dominion
Violent Daydreams
Watcher of Weasels
Word Around the Net
WuzzaDem.com



Locations of visitors to this page


Tuesday, January 13, 2004
Fly Me To the Moon...

Let me play among the stars... Let me see what spring is like on Jupiter and Mars...

Hold on a minute... that's not Frank Sinatra singing! It's President Bush!

Tomorrow, the President will unveil his plan to return to the Moon and build a permanent Lunar research station and settlement. His plan also includes sending astronauts to Mars as the next natural step in the exploration and expansion of humans into space.

Once again, President Bush proves he's a man after my own heart.  Not only will his push for space exploration redeem NASA, create jobs, spur scientific research and give America a vision for the future, but it's sure to anger many Liberals while, at the same time, keeping the USA ahead of the ambitious Chinese.  A winning situation, six different ways.

Since the Space Shuttle Columbia exploded in its final minutes of re-entry a year ago, killing all aboard, America's space exploration has been in a holding pattern. There's been widespread doubt that the agency could even survive.  Challenging NASA to meet a definite goal will revitalise not only the organisation itself, but all the dependent firms with aerospace ties. Handing NASA a mandate for this kind of effort will create a trickle-down positive effect in the tech sector as well. 

Few people could disagree with the fact that space exploration has brought huge research and development advances in every field of human endeavor. From health care to sports to communication and other technologies, nearly every industry has benefitted in some way from the development of space. Research into such problems as the bone loss all long-term astronauts experience, for instance, could be a huge boon to America's aging population.  And more than that, we Americans need a common goal that could lift us out of the media quagmire muddying our achievements in Iraq, Afghanistan and other countries (fifty million people freed from oppression and counting...), as well as the constant petty political attacks on the President by the Democrats.  Returning to space could give all Americans a sense of common pride and accomplishment. We belong at the forefront of science. We belong at the forefront of technology. We belong at the forefront of exploration.  We belong in space.  In every possible way, space exploration is worth the cost.

Naturally, some people will disagree, and in the most vitriolic ways. 

Mark my words, the coming weeks and months will hear fevered objections to President Bush's determination to return to space.  We'll hear over and over about how the government's money (your money, my money) should be spent on more social programs, which (as we all know) might alleviate the problems of a few, for the short term only.  One of the main problems with these people, mostly Liberals, is their inablility to see anything but the short term -- witness their impatience with the slowly-but-steadily improving Iraq situation. The kind of people who could whine that nine months has already been too long to rebuild an entire country and acclimate its people to a democratic form of government will be unable to understand the kind of sustained national effort space exploration takes.  The people who had the same opinion in the 1960's wasted no time taking advantage of the benefits it brought, nor will today's objectors.

I can just hear the cries of objection now, from people who want to sacrifice the advance of science and technology to their own ideological agendas. Perhaps they'll say, "No blood for science!" or "It's all about the helium-3!"  What kind of people protest the advance of science and the general betterment of the human condition?  A few more years of Liberal cultural domination will see us all living in caves, instead of reaching for the stars.

Where we belong.

Posted at Tuesday, January 13, 2004 by CavalierX

Juliet
January 13, 2004   11:33 PM PST
 
the frank sinatra is actually what made me click on your blog, and I was completely surprised to see it be a Bush Blog! Nice going! Love it!
JM
January 13, 2004   11:38 PM PST
 
Hey, how often will I get to link GWB with ol' Blue Eyes? ;)
Robert McClelland
January 14, 2004   12:24 AM PST
 
Bush is going to bankrupt your country.
Angela
January 14, 2004   02:14 AM PST
 
I wanna go to the Moon, too. I wanna see if there's any truth in it -that allah lives up there and throws stones at the infidel.
Go America! Man's destiny is to settle the Universe, not fly aircraft into buildings.
Marc P
January 14, 2004   02:41 PM PST
 
I couldn't disagree more. If we spend all that money to go to the moon and Mars, where's all the money going to come from for the upcoming wars in Iran, Syria, and N Korea?
Sarah
January 15, 2004   09:38 AM PST
 
Cav, saw your comments on RWN today re: DU. You rule.
Name
January 15, 2004   12:51 PM PST
 
I don't concur. A moon base??

WTF over.
Chris
January 15, 2004   02:10 PM PST
 
I was in third grade when Apollo 17 (the last manned moon mission) happened, and I was distraught when I heard that we weren't planning another one. "Why are we stopping? Let's build a moonbase and then head to Mars!"

I built moonbases in my basement using sheets, old furniture, and couch cushions... until I watched Space:1999 for the first time. Then I got scared and put it all away.

Seriously, though, _somebody_ is going to the stars. And it damn well better be us.

And I'd feel exactly the same way if Clinton had proposed the whole thing.
Mike H.
January 15, 2004   02:27 PM PST
 
JM, it gives me hope for the future.

Marc, the money for the next one comes from the taxes that come in from the people that work on the contracts etc. I've never seen a shuttle load of dollar bills sent out yonder.
Kerry Dupont
January 15, 2004   10:36 PM PST
 
Cav, was looking for you over at Healing Iraq tonight. Also waiting on a post from you re: the "marriage initiative". I'm curious for your read on it. We all need our breaks from blogging though. I'd rather read a blogger that takes them because it means that I trust that they are more in touch with reality as they have a life.
JM
January 16, 2004   12:59 AM PST
 
Good site, Mark! RWN is RightWingNews; it's not so much Republican as Conservative.
<--- There's a link in the left column. :)
Michael Cosyns
January 17, 2004   10:04 AM PST
 
Robbo!!!! Where you been??? We all miss you at the Iraqi's corner!!!

<I>"Bush is going to bankrupt your country."</I>

Btw Robbo, your argument sucks.

Cav yeah, I too can't help but love the guy. But it's kind of funny it took the commies to spur the US into competition.
Robert McClelland
January 18, 2004   01:10 AM PST
 
>Btw Robbo, your argument sucks.

Yeah, my bad. This lunar lunacy of Bush's was just a bit of election year trickery.

But he is still going to bankrupt your country. Not that I have anything against that. In fact, I rather like the idea.
JM
January 18, 2004   03:32 AM PST
 
Ooh, sorry, Robert -- I know how much you want the USA to collapse. But a) hardly any more money is being allocated to NASA for this (NASA is being encouraged to find the extra money within its current budget) and b) every penny spent in space comes back tenfold. Guess we'll still be here for quite some time.
 

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments




Previous Entry Home Next Entry