Though the Left hates to admit it (you're a "warmonger" if you mention it), America is in the middle -- actually, just the beginning -- of a long, hard, tough war.
The war actually began on 26 February, 1993, when al-Qaeda operatives entered the US (with assistance from Iraqi intelligence) and set off a truck bomb in the parking garage of the World Trade Center. The one-sided war continued for years, with al-Qaeda attacks on the barracks at Riyadh in 1995, Khobar Towers in 1996, the two US embassy bombings (Dar es Salaam and Nairobi) in 1998, the attack on he USS Cole in 2000, and finally the incidents that woke us up and changed the way we viewed the war on 9/11. Most of us are still awake, but by no means all of us.
For eight years, we pretended that the war was just a series of unrelated crimes. We pretended that there was no Enemy, no network of terrorists planning ever-larger attacks on us and our way of life. Lulled into a false sense of security by Bill Clinton's mishandling of terrorism, we ignored the most insidious threat we've ever faced as a nation until those terrorists forced us to acknowledge them.
Now it's an election year, and the Democrats want to regain power. They want to return us to that false sense of security in which we pay no attention to the hazy inner workings of the government. It's kind of tempting, isn't it? Who wants to live with the reality of terrorist threats every day? Who volunteers for that (besides, of course, the Israelis)? Just get rid of George W. Bush, the Democrats pledge, and all will be well. You can all relax! We'll take care of you. Wesley Clark even went so far as to promise no more terrorist attacks, if he becomes President. John Edwards is a trial lawyer not even finished his first term as Senator; to plunge him into the forefront of an international war would be to commit national suicide. And as for John Kerry, the current Democratic front-runner, according to his own web site:
Kerry recognizes that a global security effort and the war against terrorism require active participation of the international community. As President, John Kerry will move quickly to rebuild American alliances and define a global security strategy that is collective, not imperial, inclusive not exclusive, and cooperative not unilateralist.
Let's ignore for the moment the fact that nearly every country in the world is already assisting us in the war on terror, including France, Germany and Russia. Let's ignore for the moment the fact that if you handed Kerry a map and asked him to point out the countries that are part of the "imperialistic" American empire, he'd have to take a pass. Let's also ignore for the moment the fact that over sixty countries are a part of the Coalition that is helping Iraq move towards a democratic form of government for the first time ever (48 at the time Saddam was forcibly removed from power), utterly demolishing the "unilateralist" lie.
In the recent Democratic debate in South Carolina (29 January), John Kerry stated:
The war on terror is less -- it is occasionally military, and it will be, and it will continue to be for a long time. And we will need the best-trained and the most well-equipped and the most capable military, such as we have today. But it's primarily an intelligence and law enforcement operation that requires cooperation around the world -- the very thing this administration is worst at.
The truth is that John Kerry, as much as any Democrat, sees terrorism as a mere law enforcement issue, even after all we've been through since 9/11. Even though treating terrorism as a law enforcement matter utterly failed us, and led us down the path to 9/11 with blinders on. That's the approach to terrorism the Democrats would bring back to the White House -- arrest the minions, ignore the masters, make pretty speeches about how we're handling it so well. President Bush might have been anticipating Kerry's weak Clintonesque approach to handling terror when, in the 2004 State of the Union address, he said:
I know that some people question if America is really in a war at all. They view terrorism more as a crime, a problem to be solved mainly with law enforcement and indictments. After the World Trade Center was first attacked in 1993, some of the guilty were indicted and tried and convicted, and sent to prison. But the matter was not settled. The terrorists were still training and plotting in other nations, and drawing up more ambitious plans. After the chaos and carnage of September the 11th, it is not enough to serve our enemies with legal papers. The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States, and war is what they got.
John Kerry -- like the rest of the Democrats -- actually thinks you'll believe that if only GW Bush wasn't the President, then we could just stop having the war on terror; that the world would love us "again"... as if they ever really did.
Posted at Wednesday, February 04, 2004 by
CavalierX