Click to bookmark this page!

- Contact Me -
Include your email address

<< February 2004 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
01 02 03 04 05 06 07
08 09 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29


Just in case you weren't sure...
If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:

Please sign the Ted Kennedy Resignation Petition!


rss feed

Shameless Self-Promotion

Buy this book (not just because it contains two of my op-eds):
Americans on Politics, Policy, and Pop Culture:
The 101 Best Opinion Editorials From OpEds.com


An Interview With the G-Man:
My first (hopefully not last) experience in live radio, being interviewed by G. Gordon Liddy!



Perspective
Joe Mariani

Number of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships by precision use of American military force under George W. Bush:
50 million in just two years

Number of people freed from totalitarian dictatorships by anti-American Bush-bashing terrorist-appeasing whining elitists:
Zero. Ever.
...

The problem seems to me to be the definition of "free speech". Liberals define it as anything they want to say or do that opposes America. I say "speech" ends where "action" begins. Once you pick up a gun for the enemy, throw a rock at a cop during a "peace" march, send money to a terrorist organisation, or travel to Baghdad to block an American JDAM with your ass, you have crossed the line from free speech to costly action.
...

Saying the War on Terror is all about al-Qaeda is like saying we should have fought the Japanese Naval Air Force after Pearl Harbor. Not the Japanese Navy, not the Japanese Army, not the Empire of Japan -- just the Naval Air Force.
...

Complaining about the "waste" when human embryos are destroyed instead of being used in medical experiments is a lot like going to a funeral and complaining about the waste of perfectly good meat.
...

Blaming CO2 for climate change is like blaming smoke for the fire. CO2 is largely a following, not a leading, indicator of a rise in temperature.
...

Cavalier's First Theorem:
Every time, Liberals will fight to protect the guilty and kill the innocent, while Conservatives will fight to protect the innocent and punish the guilty.

Cavalier's Second Theorem:
Liberals are just Socialists who want to be loved... then again, Socialists are just Communists who lack the courage of their convictions.

Cavalier's Third Theorem:
Any strongly moral, hawkish or pro-American statement by a Liberal will inevitably be followed by a "but."

Top News Headlines

Iraq Blogs

The Messopotamian
Iraq at a Glance
Iraq the Model
Hammorabi
Iraq & Iraqis
Nabil's Blog
Road of a Nation
The Sun of Iraq
Healing Iraq

Iraqi Bloggers Central

The Truth About Iraq
Liberating Iraq
Pictures from Iraq
The Iraqi Holocaust: a collection
Iraq's Mass Graves

Mudville Gazette:
News the media can't use

The Other Iraq:
The Iraq you never hear about in the MSM

Michael Yon - Online Magazine
Dispatches not filed from the Baghdad Hilton hot tub


United States Central Command


Humor

Infamous Monsters of Filmland

Day by Day: Chris Muir's witty comic strip with a political bent

The Ultimate War Simulation: Why does this scenario seem so familiar?

What Kind of Liberal Are You?
Save me the trouble of figuring out what kind of idiot you are

Blame Bush
Because Bush is to blame... for everything

Sacred Cow Burgers
Web Archive

Satirical Political Beliefs Test

Communists for Kerry

Cooper's Protester Guide

Fellowship 9/11: Sauron never attacked Rohan, Saruman did! Yet a small group of elitists convinced Middle-earth to divert resources from the real war to attack Mordor for personal gain.


Analysis

When Democrats Attack
Did prominent Democrats switch positions on Iraq just to attack President Bush for political gain? (See the updated list.)

Was Iraqi Freedom Justified?
An honest, step-by-step analysis of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq that Congress voted into law shows that it was.

Saddam's Philanthropy of Terror
Details of solid ties to organised international terrorism

How The Left Betrayed Iraq
by Naseer Flayih Hasan

Did We Botch The Occupation?
No, not of Iraq: of Germany. Read the media's take on how we "lost the peace" in 1946 and compare.

Debunking 8 Anti-War Myths About the Conflict in Iraq

Pictures from Hate Bush/Hate America/Hate Capitalism/Hate Israel/general wacko rallies
- by Zombie

Jihad Watch


2004 Election Links

Looosers: Sorry, Everybody!
Winners: You're Welcome, Everybody!


2008 Election

Peace Through Strength PAC


Duncan Hunter in 2008
official site



Click to join duncanhunterforpresident2008 at Yahoo! Groups

Useful Links

FamilyWishList
Share your wish list with friends and family

Virtual Tourist
Travel tips from real travelers

RemBot.com
Appointment calendar with email/wireless notification

PriceGrabber.com
Convenient comparison shopping


Reading Material

RightWingNews
The best right-wing news and commentary

GOP USA Commentary Corner

Men's News Daily
The New Media

OpinionEditorials.com
a project of Frontiers of Freedom

ChronWatch
SF Chronicle watchdog and conservative news

American Daily
Analysis with political and social commentary

The Conservative Voice
Conservative news and opinion

News By Us
...not news bias

IntellectualConservative.com
Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics

CommonConservative.com
Practical conservatism for the common man

USASentinel
Analysis, Commentary and Opinion on the Real World

PhillyFuture.org
Philly news and blogs


Now Reading

The Fatal Conceit:
The Errors of Socialism
by F. A. Hayek



Articles Previously Published at
Useless-Knowledge.com

- When Good Liberals Go Bad - 05/29/03
- How Stupid Do Democrats Think You Are? - 05/31/03
- Who Are These 'Rich' Getting Tax Cuts, Anyway? - 06/02/03
- How Can We Miss The Clintons If They Won't Go Away? - 06/04/03
- Whining of Mass Distraction: How To Discredit A President - 06/05/03
- Liberal "Rules" for Arguing - 06/10/03
- Liberalism: Curable or Terminal? - 06/14/03
- Filibustering Judges: Hijacking Presidential Powers? - 06/17/03
- Is Hamas Exempt from the War on Terror? - 06/22/03
- How Malleable Is The Constitution? - 06/26/03
- Rejecting Our Biological and Cultural Heritage - 06/30/03
- I Need Liberal Assistance, Now! - 07/02/03
- Bring Them On - 07/03/03
- We Need You Arrogant Warmongering Americans...Again - 07/09/03
- Much Ado About Nothing, Again - 07/13/03
- Double Standard: Blindly Blame Bush - 07/18/03
- Was WWII Also Unjustified? - 07/20/03
- Clinton Backing Bush? Don't Bet On It! - 07/24/03
- How To Be A Hypocritical Liberal - 07/28/03
- The Clinton Legacy: In Answer to Mr. Stensrud - 07/30/03
-What Is 'Good News' To Liberals? - 08/02/03
- Bush's Big Blunder - 08/06/03
- The Meaning of Right - Why I Supported the Iraq War - 08/10/03
- More Liberal "Rules" for Arguing - 08/14/03
- You Can Have Cary Grant; I'll Take John Wayne! - 08/19/03
- Where Is The ACLU When It's Actually Needed? - 08/25/03
- Who's Afraid Of The Big Bad Ten Commandments? - 08/28/03
- From The Weasels: Thanks For Nothing - 08/30/03
- The Liberal Superfriends - 09/02/03
- Liberal Superfriends 2: The Sequel - 09/05/03
- Saddam and 9/11: Connect the Dots - 09/08/03
- Throwing Away the Southern Vote - 11/02/03
- Libya: The First Domino Falls - 12/20/03
- Is the UN Playing Games with American Politics? - 03/04/04


Blogs to Browse

Across the Pond
AlphaPatriot
Arts for Democracy
Betsy's Page
Bill Karl
Blonde Sagacity
Bull Moose Strikes Back
Common Sense & Wonder
Conservative Pleasure
Dangerous Logic
DowneastBlog
ElectionProjection
Everything I Know Is Wrong
Freedom of Thought
Sally Girl
Korla Pundit
LogiPundit.com
MarkLevinFan
Mark Nicodemo
Michelle Malkin
Moonbattery
My Arse From My Elbow
QandO Blog
RadioBS.net
Rebel Rouser
RightThinkingGirl
Sally Girl
Samantha Burns
Semi-Intelligent Thoughts
Sighed Effects
Sister Toldjah
Stark Truth
Take A Stand Against Liberals
The Resplendent Mango
The Right Society
The YNC
Tom's Common Sense
Tom DeLay
Tomfoolery of the Highest Order
Trying to Grok
TS Right Dominion
Violent Daydreams
Watcher of Weasels
Word Around the Net
WuzzaDem.com



Locations of visitors to this page


Saturday, February 14, 2004
Truth in Campaign Advertising -- Vote Democrat!

If only there was a "truth in advertising" law for political campaigns... and if only we could force the Democrats to obey it! Would their campaign ads look something like this?

Vote Democrat!  We'll fight to reduce the CIA and decimate the military, then attack the President when the CIA can't provide correct information and the military is spread so thin we have to call in the National Guard and Reservists!

Vote Democrat!  We'll base our next campaign on mere accusations of thirty-year-old minor wrongdoings, instead of the issues at hand! When we're proven wrong by mountains of documents and eyewitness accounts, we'll demand more and more proof! Forget that "innocent until proven guilty" garbage! As a bonus, we'll make sure that the White House spends more time digging through old microfiche records than running the country and protecting you from terrorists!

Vote Democrat!  When a third-rate filmmaker who's a known fraud makes a baseless accusation against the President, we'll turn it into a major campaign issue, slamming the voters with it in every media outlet as well as the floor of Congress! We'll make such a mountain out of that molehill, even Colin Powell will be forced to deliver smackdown!  On the other hand, when a journalist reports an ongoing investigation by Time and ABC into a serious and recent character issue with our favorite prospective candidate, we'll squash the story so no one hears about it!

Vote Democrat!  We'll authorise the use of military force in Iraq because public opinion demands it, then vote against the money needed to fund it once the troops are already there! Also, we'll publicly attack the National Guard after sending them to war, saying that serving in the National Guard isn't really being in the military!

Vote Democrat!  We'll tell you we're the party of human rights, then do everything possible to repudiate a war which freed twenty-five million people from tyranny and brutality!

Vote Democrat!  Even though we fully agreed with UNSCOM in 1997 and UNMOVIC in 2003 that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction right up until our troops entered Iraq, we'll try our best to make the case that the President lied to us about it instead of the other way around!

Vote Democrat!  We'll force America to abide by a quota system for racial minorities and women in education and employment, while castigating Americans for being divided by race and sex!  Let hypocrisy be our watchword!

Vote Democrat!  We'll blame the President for losing the love of the entire world through poor diplomacy, while insulting most of the sixty nations in the Coalition he put together with diplomacy as being "the bribed, the coerced, the bought and the extorted"!  They will definitely love us again after that!

Vote Democrat!  We'll fight to raise taxes on businesses, so they won't have the money to hire new employees... then attack the President for giving tax breaks to businesses as an incentive to hire people!

Vote Democrat!  We're far more interested in pointing the finger of blame than fixing the problems! We're far more interested in past mistakes than future plans!  That's because we have none!

Vote Democrat!  We'll represent ourselves as being the "party of the poor" when we're bought and paid for by the richest fatcats in the country! We'll represent ourselves as "fighting special interests" when our candidates rake in more special interest cash than anyone! We'll represent ourselves as being the "party of minorities" when we block minority judges from a confirmation vote on because of their ethnicity or possible rulings on "affirmitive" action! As a bonus, we'll hound people like Trent Lott (R-Ms) out of office when they give a compliment to an old man who once ran on a segregationist ticket fifty years ago, but ignore when Bill Clinton honors segregationist William Fulbright! Plus, we keep known KKK member Robert "Sheets" Byrd (D-W.Va) around just to remind us of our roots!

Vote Democrat!  We want to return to the days when we could pretend al-Qaeda didn't exist, France actually liked us, and Kim Jong Il and Saddam Hussein were men of their word. We reject reality!

Vote Democrat!  We kiss the world's collective ass better!

Don't think the Republicans get off scot-free, however.

Vote Republican!  We'll represent ourselves as the party of smaller government while the Federal budget grows like Orson Welles at an all-you-can-eat buffet!

Vote Republican!  We'll talk about decreasing spending while passing a Medicare increase so large even the Democrats are jealous!

Of course, there is one thing the Republicans could say under a "truth in campaign advertising" rule:

Vote Republican!  We're the best choice if you want a government to protect the country, defeat our enemies, ensure freedom, spread democracy, and grow businesses.

I guess we can hash out the domestic issues among ourselves.  With Democrats running the country, however, we may not have that luxury.

Posted at Saturday, February 14, 2004 by CavalierX

Rob Lawson
February 14, 2004   02:04 PM PST
 
Oh man! That was great. I think I just lost 20 pounds laughing prior to replying.

Nice, Joe. I think your post is funny 'cause it's true. I'll certainly vote Republican this November.
Mike H.
February 14, 2004   03:04 PM PST
 
Right on!
JM
February 14, 2004   03:19 PM PST
 
If only someone could slip a little truth drug into the water they use for ice cubes during the Democratic convention in Boston. We might get to actually HEAR this stuff for real!
Christopher Taylor
February 14, 2004   11:36 PM PST
 
You missed a few, but got the highlights. Throw in some about keeping blacks on the plantation and out of office so they keep voting for Democrats heh heh...
JM
February 15, 2004   10:43 AM PST
 
Thanks, Christopher... added something about Affirmative Action and another about WMDs that someone suggested by email. :)
Gerry
February 15, 2004   04:30 PM PST
 
I think you missed (at least) one in the Republican column: Amnesty for illegal immigrants and open boarders. Those CEOs need the cheal labor and personal servants. Also, perhaps you could explain how deindustrializing the US, literally shipping our manufacturing plants overseas, and exporting all except high-level managerial jobs, contributes to the security of the country.
Zee
February 15, 2004   09:52 PM PST
 
Bravo! First time visiting your blog and woohoo - you hit the nail right on the head about the Dems and the Repubs. But I'll take W over the "competition" anytime :)

Keep up the good work!
--Zee
Zee
February 15, 2004   09:54 PM PST
 
And one other thing:

Don't ever stop laying the smackdown on the Dems! The more the better! :-)

--Zee
Tj
February 16, 2004   11:21 AM PST
 
Just what truth are you going by? How about offering solutions? You know, we are the Government. More fun to bash though, isn't it?
JM
February 16, 2004   12:23 PM PST
 
The only solution I have to offer the Democratic party is this: hurry and divest yourself of these America-hating far-left Liberal wackos, and return to being the strong Democratic party you used to be. Only then can we have honest, serious debates about the issues again, instead of all this Bush-bashing Blame America First terrorist-appeasing French-ass-kissing nonsense.
How's that sound?
Tj
February 16, 2004   04:52 PM PST
 
Not bad JM, but following along this logic, wouldn't the GOP have to rid themselves of the wrapped-in-the-flag far-right war mongers? How about everyone rolling up their sleeves and we communicate again, not just the two party thing. Honestly, how different are the two parties? Are we really getting two distinct choices? Maybe a solution is starting at the local level and making changes at home first. Helping our neighbor and let their differences be differences. This is why I think that this is a great country to begin with, we have the diversity and use it as a strength, not a deterrent where we are falling into hyprocrisy on "both" sides. People are voting for a party rather than the best solution. Are we really this devoid of leaders? Maybe it starts with Truth, where this site has caught my interest. I think that there is a level of Truth for an individual, and then a level of Truth that applies to a society. Maybe we have blurred this distinction, especially with the Internet. Never in history have the so-called masses been able to express opinions, which are just that, opinions, not the Truth. Hence my original question about where does Truth come from? This might not be the proper forum for this discussion, but so far this hasn't just deteriorated into name calling and mud-slinging, which is refreshing. Thanks for the time.
JM
February 16, 2004   05:35 PM PST
 
Which far-right wing partisans do you mean? (Flag waving is considered a GOOD thing on THIS blog.) When people speak of the far right, they generally mean people like, say, Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh or Pat Robertson. What offices do they hold? The Left, on the other hand, routinely elects their fringe element to power.
Tj
February 16, 2004   08:16 PM PST
 
Well I guess by wrapped in the flag I meant blindly following without question or when questions are posed, one is deemed unpatriotic for asking them. Flag waving for patriotism is good.

As for being elected, I haven't seen any ballots for Michael Moore, Alec Baldwin or any other actresses/actors.
And Sharpton hasn't made it - YET. -- Of course there have been several actors for the other party that have been elected that I can think of... ;-)

As for the general question, it appears that you believe there are distinctions between the parties past the rhetoric. I still fail to see them, and hence I am venturing out and trying to find answers. Maybe I can get better at asking the right questions. Thanks for the view points and time to respond.
JM
February 16, 2004   09:45 PM PST
 
I don't know anyone who blindly follows GW Bush, and it has nothing to do with flags. He's by far the best choice of all available candidates, however, being the only one who will keep working to destroy terrorists and dictators. We can no longer just sit back and wait to be attacked. I have problems with some of his policies, but he's still the best candidate for the job. Lieberman could have given him a run, but the Democrats wouldn't touch him with a ten-foot pole. Or maybe poll. :)

As for elected far-left-wing wackos, I'll have to make up a list one day. You can start with Ted Kennedy, Dennis Kucinich, Nancy Pelosi, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, Charlie Rangel, and Carl Levin. And THAT'S just off the top of my head.
 

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments




Previous Entry Home Next Entry