Entry: What About the Anti-Romanism in "The Passion"? Thursday, February 26, 2004



Like most of the reviewers who are leveling attacks at Mel Gibson's new movie "The Passion of the Christ", I have not bothered to see the movie before writing my review.  Like Andy Rooney said, why should I have to pay "for a few laughs", right?  My opinions are just as valid as his, and he hasn't seen it either.  If not having seen it doesn't stop other critics from offering well-deserved criticism of the movie, however, then it shouldn't stop me either.  

Most other critics are attacking the movie for its subtle anti-semitic overtones, but no one seems concerned with the blatant anti-Roman attitude the movie takes throughout.  This is an outrage!  This movie openly portrays Romans as warmongering, imperialistic occupiers of Judea.  Yes, I realise that the Romans did, in fact, have an empire which was occupying Judea at the time of the events shown in the movie.  However, that's no excuse to show only one side of their important story.  Where are the scenes of happy, laughing, playful Romans peacefully cavorting in parks or something?  No, the only Romans shown in the movie (at least, this is what I believe, not having actually seen it myself) are brutal soldiers.  One of them even insults a Jew by calling him... a Jew!  It's a completely unfair, totally unbalanced and anti-Roman portrayal of the Romans.

Another thing about the movie that upsets me (or will, when I get around to seeing it) is the use of Gore.  Everyone who knows anything about the movie (especially those who refused to see it for just this reason) says that it features an excessive use of Gore.  Frankly, I feel that any use of Gore is excessive, but what I really want to know is why he was even in this movie at all?  He's not even Jewish!  Was Al Gore just in the movie to yell angrily about how Judas betrayed Jesus?  It doesn't make any sense.  It's curious that the same critics who say there was too much violence and Gore in this movie had nothing but praise for violent movies like Gladiator and Mel Gibson's movie Braveheart, which also had too much Gore in it.  Perhaps they didn't complain because he at least looks Scottish.

The third problem I will have with the movie is its recurring references to Christian religious dogma.  Everyone in the movie seems to be spouting quotes from the Bible, except the Romans, who mostly speak Roman.  It's bad enough when people shove their religion in your face by wearing crosses under their shirts and all, but to have the main character walk down a public street with a cross bigger than his whole body is just unreasonable!

Last but not least, I'm unhappy with the way they made everyone look vaguely Jewish except the Romans, who looked vaguely Italian.  They even made Jesus and his followers look Jewish, while everyone knows they were Christians.  No wonder the Jews are angry!

   12 comments

CinnamonGrrl
February 26, 2004   02:43 PM PST
 
You are a 24 carat kook, you know that? Good thing I *like* kooks. This was brilliant. Love you, M.
American
February 26, 2004   03:47 PM PST
 
And where were the Palestinian (alright, Judean) Arabs? Why were they walled off from participation?
JM
February 26, 2004   04:01 PM PST
 
LOL. According to the Liberals, they were peacefully farming Palestine at that time, a land which doesn't appear on any maps due to an oversight.
StarkTruth
February 26, 2004   07:41 PM PST
 
Well, when in Rome, do as the Romans....where is that Gore guy anyhow?
JM
February 26, 2004   08:06 PM PST
 
Gore? I hope he's getting ready to endorse some hapless Democratic Presidential candidate. I swear he's the Republicans' secret weapon.
StarkTruth
February 26, 2004   08:19 PM PST
 
He most certainly is. Put him and Howard Dean on a ticket and we would get 100% of the rational vote. Of course the "yarrrggghhhh" voters would be out there, but I think we could overcome those folks. What is there platform based on? Screaming and yelling. Even "crazy eyes" Nader doesn't yell and he has crazy eyes.
JM
February 26, 2004   08:23 PM PST
 
Poor Ralph. How the Democrats are attacking him! Funny, I don't remember the Republicans attacking Perot or Buchanan for "handing the election" to Clinton.
StarkTruth
February 26, 2004   08:42 PM PST
 
Come on now, we all love Crazy Eyes
JM
February 26, 2004   08:55 PM PST
 
I pity him more than ever, now that only Conservatives are defending him.
StarkTruth
February 26, 2004   09:03 PM PST
 
Shows the vitriol of the left. They only care for the party and the mantra. Look how much they have done for minorities.
Name
June 23, 2005   11:41 AM PDT
 
You seriously didn't know Jesus was a Jew? Why do you think he's constantly referred to as "King of the Jews"? Wow...for someone with such a strong opinion, you might want to actually do some research before you start spouting off.
JM
June 23, 2005   06:43 PM PDT
 
You seriously didn't know this was satire? ROFL!

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments