|
At some point, we will have to muster the courage to face the facts about Senator Edward "Ted" Kennedy (D-Ma). Since the decision to remove Saddam Hussein from power was made, his criticisms of the President have become more shrill and accusatory. For the most part, that's fine -- the First Amendment protects the right to freedom of speech that we all have, within certain limits. (For instance, one cannot yell "Fire!" in a crowded building if there isn't one.) However, Ted Kennedy may have crossed those limits in his excessively vitriolic attacks on the President and his decision to liberate Iraq from Saddam Hussein. President Bush, having been granted the Authorization for Use of Military Force in Iraq by Congress, decided to use that authorised force to remove Saddam Hussein from power. Whether the liberation of Iraq was justified as part of the War on Terror became merely an argument for historians at that point, in a certain respect. The fact is that the United States was and remains at war, like it or not. Though our Taliban enemies and Saddam Hussein were swiftly defeated, the larger war against terrorism and the States that support it has not ended. At the moment, it is concentrated in that same Iraq that was once a prime supporter of terrorists under Saddam, including the open payment of $25,000 to the family of at least one Hamas suicide bomber, and $10,000 to other Palestinian militants. Our enemies now are the terrorists that have poured into Iraq to prevent that country from becoming an open and democratic nation. Such an event would begin the destruction of terrorism as the only way for -- from their point of view -- disaffected and disenfranchised Muslims to make their voices heard. Many Middle Eastern countries are repressive Islamo-fascist dictatorships, if not outright theocracies. Whether the rulers are minority Sunni subjugating a majority Shi'ite population, a self-perpetuating religious oligarchy controlling a restless population through fear, or a single extended family ruling just about everyone else, the pressure is only relieved by channeling it into anti-Western rage. The most restive and angry -- and brainwashed -- people are the most likely to become recruits for terrorism. Repressive dictatorships must have an escape valve, or the pressure of their own restive populations would cause them to explode. We do have enemies, and our enemies have chosen this war. The terrorists have declared that we are their enemy. Whether we like it or not, whether we agree on how we got there or not, we are at war with them in Iraq now. The recent horrific beheading of Nick Berg shows us exactly what kind of people those enemies are, and what they want. We must rid the Middle East of these terrorists -- that's what the War on Terror is all about. And Ted Kennedy has repeatedly given aid and comfort to the enemy in various ways in the course of this war. He has sought to undermine the credibility of the commander-in-chief by accusing him of manufacturing the case for war in Iraq for his own personal and political ends. "This was made up in Texas, announced in January [2003] to the Republican leadership that war was going to take place and was going to be good politically. This whole thing was a fraud," Kennedy said in September 2003. The resolution authorising the war became law by Congressional vote in October 2002, three months earlier. In October 2003 Kennedy said, "The trumped up reasons for going to war have collapsed," and "the President's war has been revealed as mindless, needless, senseless, and reckless." These accusations can only have a detrimental effect on the morale of our armed forces fighting "the President's war," and on American credibility in the world. He has sought to decrease the effectiveness of America's ability to prosecute war by demanding that Bush fire Donald Rumsfeld in the middle of a war. "I think we need a new beginning," Kennedy said after Rumsfeld's testimony before the Senate regarding the mistreatment of some prisoners in Iraq. By all accounts the abuse seems to have been performed by guards exceeding their orders, on their own initiative. When the abuse was reported, it was immediately investigated. The report from Major General Taguba found, as he told the Senate, that there were no actual orders given to the guards or policy set to mistreat the prisoners, though it was "suggested" by General Geoffrey Miller that they set the "conditions for the successful exploitation of internees." There is no evidence whatsoever that Rumsfeld had anything to do with it, yet this situation is being used to demand his replacement. Removing the Secretary of Defense on such a flimsy pretext in the middle of an ongoing conflict would cause a serious disruption of our military's coherence and efficacy. He has sought to damage the morale of US troops in the field of combat by comparing them to Saddam Hussein's torture squads, speaking of the same prisoner mistreatment. "On March 19, 2004, President Bush asked, 'Who would prefer that Saddam's torture chambers still be open?'" said Kennedy. "Shamefully, we now learn that Saddam's torture chambers reopened under new management: U.S. management." Saddam Hussein's torture methodology included eye gouging, the piercing of hands with an electric drill, suspension until ligaments were torn, acid baths and feeding the victim feet-first into a plastic shredder. It is infamous and outrageous when our enemies compare the US military to Saddam's State-sanctioned torturers. How much more so when a sitting US Senator does it? Title 18, Part I, Chapter 115, Section 2381 of the United States Legal Code defines "treason" in the following way: "Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason." Senator Kennedy's accusations have given comfort to our enemies, who must surely think that they can force us to back down from them when they hear his vitriolic attacks. His words have aided the enemy by sapping the morale of American troops facing them in Iraq and Afghanistan. For the successful prosecution of the fight against terrorism, our enemies must see that while we may argue amongst ourselves, we are united against them. For the good of the country, Senator Kennedy must step down from the Senate. UPDATE: Please sign the online petition to request Senator Kennedy's resignation. |
| d_Brit May 13, 2004 11:52 PM PDT technically, it borders on treason. Practically speaking, treason is too great a charge. That is because probably 20% of the american public agrees and speaks that and worse. 20% of 350M people is 70M people, will we charge them all with treason? Make an example out of kennedy? That would tear the country apart and you know it. What can be done? Ostracism and censure is the appropriate response. Verbal confrontation in the Senate is another. Any other extra legal means of censure... | ||
| JM May 14, 2004 05:09 AM PDT That's why I say Kennedy should step down. As for 20% of the public, they're not prominent members of the Senate. Kennedy's position carrries with it certain responsibilities, including that of not trying to tear the country apart. He doesnt seem to realise that one can dissent and question without these accusations of wrongdoing, which only give our enemies hope. | ||
| Jamie May 14, 2004 10:05 AM PDT One obvious indication that Kennedy should be censored is that the ME news carriers use Kennedy's (and those others like him, Byrd, Clinton and even Kerry) words to back up their own skewed reporting. Article on Weekly Standard about Kennedy. http://tinyurl.com/yuh3a | ||
| JM May 14, 2004 10:08 AM PDT Precisely... Kennedy is giving the enemy ammunition to use against us. How much worse does it have to get before he's at least censured?? | ||
| Jamie May 14, 2004 01:12 PM PDT You would think that there would be some "self-censure" by the members of Congress, especially since they are representatives of "the people" who elected them. But, people like Kennedy and Bryd don't care if the use of vitriolic diaglog to trash the reputation of the entire U.S. military results in more deaths in Iraq. Probably because very few military people voted for them. | ||
| Lea May 14, 2004 04:39 PM PDT Are you British? I notice you use the British spelling on certain words. Just wondering. I agree wholeheartedly, but don't hold your breath waiting for anyone to censure Ted Kennedy or "KKK" Byrd. | ||
| JM May 14, 2004 04:47 PM PDT No, but too many of my teachers were. :) Never got out of the habits I learned from them. | ||
| d_Brit May 14, 2004 08:19 PM PDT kennedy et al would have to go a LOT further before the senate would hold censure. They ARE representing the people who support them! we just have contempt for those people. Unfortunately there are a LOT of them... | ||
| Mike H. May 14, 2004 11:45 PM PDT What if he violates his Oath of Office? http://www.senate.gov/reference/reference_index_subjects/Oath_vrd.htm | ||
| Christopher Taylor May 15, 2004 11:34 AM PDT The more Kennedy makes stupid, loud noises, the more it hurts the Democrats. So let him keep shouting treasonous nonsense. | ||
| The Sicilian May 15, 2004 01:34 PM PDT He definetely should be asked to step down. Further measures should be taken to ensure he is never allowed to speak in public again. That may be harsh, but he's lucky he's been allowed to go this far. | ||
| JM May 15, 2004 01:38 PM PDT Well, everyone has the right to free speech. Those who abuse that right in irresponsible ways like Kennedy should not be holding public office. And when his comments cause harm as they have done, he should be held accountable for them. | ||
| Larry May 16, 2004 12:08 AM PDT Kennedy's a clever politician. His job for the next few months will be to draw Howard Dean's lunatic, moonbat followers over to Kerry. He'll do that by periodically making idiotic, borderline-treasonous statements, to which Kerry will neither condemn or condone. It'll get even worse closer to November - He might even pop out a couple "allahu ackbar"s before he's through. | ||
| Allahu akbar May 16, 2004 08:39 AM PDT Ho, Ho, Ho Chi Minh John F. Kerry's gonna win | ||
| JM May 16, 2004 09:18 AM PDT Thanks for the proof that all Kerry's got is some old slogans from Vietnam. | ||
| Rob Lawson May 18, 2004 06:08 AM PDT "Ho, Ho, Ho Chi Minh John F. Kerry's gonna win" That's some enlightening stuff right there. Did you make that up yourself or is that the chant echoed in various al-Qaeda/HAMAS/PLO/PLF camps these days? Interesting moniker you have there, too. And I signed the petition. You know what would stink, though? If Ted Kennedy takes your petition out on a date and runs it over, then dumps its ASCII body in a river or something. Keep an eye out! | ||
| Rob Lawson May 18, 2004 06:48 AM PDT Just so you know, I made a post in my blog AND The Right Society which gives details (and a link) to your petition. http://weblogs.therightsociety.com/ | ||
| JM May 18, 2004 08:28 AM PDT Fantastic... thanks! Have you read some of the comments on that petition, especially the comemnts from angry Democrats? Wow! | ||
| The Sicilian May 20, 2004 10:32 PM PDT Woohoo...signature 391!! | ||
| Laura May 22, 2004 07:55 PM PDT If Kennedy were a Republican (heaven forbid) he would have been driven out of office before now just like Newt Gingrich and Trent Lott. LC | ||
| militant sandpiper December 3, 2004 06:23 PM PST Ted kennedy got away with murder(chapaquedic)and he is running this nation ino the ground for his own purposes its time to IMPEACH TED KENNEDY and get him out of the political spotlight for good | ||
| mgisalive January 17, 2005 10:21 AM PST I wholly agree Ted Kennedy should be impeached for his anti-american rhetoric. As someone else stated, if he were a republican, he would already be gone! He is fueling the terrorists hopes and motivating them, that they may have a chance to win the war. We as Americans need to support or Government and be behind the President with our support. Who IS Ted Kennedy?? the brother of a president? son of a rum-runner? cheater in college - UVa. a nobody! who has abig mouth and ego. I think he should leave politics and I support efforts to have the sucess on his leaving. | ||
| Jenn January 25, 2005 03:32 PM PST I would love to see him impeached. My question is how can the rest of this country succeed in kicking his fat drunk a$$ out of the Senate when his own state won't even vote him out. What scares me more is that his son, Patrick "I've never worked a day in my life" Kennedy seems poised to carry on daddy's anti-American legacy. | ||
| taylor January 27, 2005 02:07 PM PST Enough is enough! The man is speaking treason daily, giving aid and comfort to our enemies. We need to get him out of the Senate | ||
| Leave a Comment: |