|
It's taken him quite a long time, but John Kerry has finally settled on a campaign theme. On 17 May 2004, Kerry told the Wall Street Journal that "Talking about 'Let America be America again' is tapping into that value system that people think makes this country strong." The problem is that "Let America Be America Again" was actually a rather bitter poem written by a poet named Langston Hughes in 1938. A poem that repeats the claim that, "America never was America to me," and derides America's "false patriotic wreath" in much the same manner that today's Liberals attack displays of patriotism.
This is the same Langston Hughes who wrote in 1932, in "Good-Morning, Revolution,"
Hughes also wrote in his 1938 poem, "Goodbye Christ," Goodbye, Yes, Langston Hughes was a Communist, and his poetry strongly reflected that belief system. He is described by James Smethurst in his 1999 book The New Red Negro: The Literary Left and African American Poetry, 1930-1946 as the author of "revolutionary or militant poems aimed at an audience defined largely by the cultural institutions of the CPUSA and the Comintern." Hughes was brought before the House Un-American Activities Committee in 1953 to account for his membership in the Communist Party USA, but managed to convince the members that "the pro-Communist works he had published no longer represented his thinking." Unfortunately for his social life, "Communists bitterly resented the way he abandoned professed members of the party, including W. E. B. Du Bois and Paul Robeson, whom Hughes had lauded in earlier decades." Hughes had coldly abandoned his principles to save his writing career. This is the theme for the Kerry campaign? These are the values that "people think makes this country strong" -- anger, bitterness, cynicism and Communism? If we ask, "what people think that?" would we be told that it's none of our business? Well, at least it does express the attitude of the anti-war activists Kerry once represented as a leader of the Vietnam Veterans Against the War, and those who still oppose freedom and democracy for the Iraqi people, while advocating Communism for all. (Hat tip to CrushKerry.com for this one.) |
| Ted Burke May 23, 2004 04:41 PM PDT Your rant makes you sound like you would rather Americans not strive to achieve what every patriot refers to as The American Dream and leave things in their current state. Kerry obviously means that America can exceed itself and become , again, the paragon of freedom, prosperity and justice, and has made proposals of what he'd do as President to achieve those ideals. The rant here , though, doesn't critique Kerry's ideas ,but rather indulges in classic red-baiting by focusing on the politics of poet Langston Hughes. This, we know, is distraction , pure and simple, a sideshow suitable for a carnival barking, not political analysis. In any case, Hughes qualifies his refrain that America of legend never such a thing in his experience, and effectively sets up an irony grounded in historical fact. Hughes, as a black American, felt no part of the self-congratulating hubris that dominated the political tone in his time, and the poem, is a dare , a calling and a challenge for Americans to demand their full share in the American political process and in its economic life. The other poems cited are part of another discussion , which is to say entirely irrelevant . Their use in evaluating Kerry's ideas and intentions are nil, and are more padding than evidence. Kerry , of course, adopts the line "Let America be America again" to his own cause, and this is right and good, since we one cannot imagine how to improve the lot of America and Americans at home and abroad unless there's a coherent and working knowledge of the ideals and virtues that make our system preferable over alternatives. Kerry, as a decorated Viet Nam, earned the moral right to protest that War. What he has in common with the Bay Area wackos pictured here is unexplained, since there are no Kerry remarks that I've read opposing democracy in Iraq or advocating" Communism for all".If the author can furnish links to documented quotes, I'd appreciate it. Otherwise, it's a mighty big hat your talking through. | ||
| JM May 23, 2004 08:03 PM PDT Kerry must be very glad to have Democrat apparatchiks scrambling to explain what he means by selecting a radical Communist poet's words for his campaign theme. It's a dead cinch he'll never explain it himself. It was a nice attempt at spin, Ted, but doesn't answer the question at all. | ||
| Jamie May 23, 2004 08:33 PM PDT Kerry has ideas? I've not heard any, at least not any original ones. His proposals reflect the usual blatant Democrat attempt at promising the world to garner votes. Mr. Kerry tries very hard to avoid committing himself to any specific "idea" or position. If and when he does take a stand on something, he takes the opposite position whenever the wind changes. | ||
| Ted Burke May 24, 2004 02:53 AM PDT Spin nothing, JM, since you still have to make the case that carry opposes democracy for the Iraqi people and advocates "Communism for all." These are your assertions, and the onus is on you to support them. It's doubtful that evidence is forthcoming.I parsed the context and meaning of the poem, and stated clearly that Kerry interpretation of it is a good and righteous thing. Your objection to the phrase "Let America be America again" remains problematic for you. Communist or not, Hughes was hardly unpatriotic in believing that black Americans have to demand and fight for the rights due them by the Constitution. History has judged his desire for racial justice as morally right and inevitable, which is exactly the point of the poem, and exactly what Kerry has smartly grabbed onto. Poll after poll shows Americans increasingly convinced that the country is going in the wrong direction, so this hardly a traitorous, minority concern.Kerry nor his people need explain why the line chosen, since the meaning resonates loudly. The line taps into the mainstream of American concern. The other poems by Hughes are, again, irrelevant, as are the touristy snapshots of Bay Area far left wackos. Rather than debate Kerry's ideas, you try to smear him with a big brush. Pity your paint can is empty. Your hammer is hitting everything except the nail your trying to hit. | ||
| Ted Burke May 24, 2004 03:06 AM PDT Errata: First sentence, make that "Kerry" rather than "carry". I am typing too late in the night. Cheers. | ||
| JM May 24, 2004 05:29 AM PDT >I parsed the context and meaning >of the poem, and stated clearly >that Kerry interpretation of it is a >good and righteous thing. I parsed the context and meaning of your post, and it seems to mean that you think Communism is "a good and righteous thing." No wonder you defend Kerry's choice of this anti-capitalist class-warfare-promoting poem as his campaign theme. | ||
| Ted Burke May 24, 2004 11:37 AM PDT <I>I parsed the context and meaning of your post, and it seems to mean that you think Communism is "a good and righteous thing." No wonder you defend Kerry's choice of this anti-capitalist class-warfare-promoting poem as his campaign theme. </EM> You did no such thing, since I made no statements in my remarks defending Communism and its ruinous legacy. Try as you might, you can't find a single pro-Commie sentiment in my reply. What I did defend is freedom, justice and equality, which indeed are "good and righteous" things for Americans and America. I defined my argument, and you blur yours further. This dodgy set of replies from you implies that you have a problem with minority Americans from using their due civil rights and liberties. Have you found documentation yet that John Kerry opposes democracy for the Iraqis, and that has advocated "Communism for all"? Didn't think so. | ||
| JM May 24, 2004 12:02 PM PDT >implies that you have a problem >with minority Americans from using >their due civil rights and liberties I KNEW this idiot would get around to calling me a racist sooner or later, because I don't approve of a poet's Communist cheerleading and he just happens to be black. So, why does Kerry approve of his Communist cheerleading? You still haven't answered that one. You keep pretending that Hughes isn't Communist, or that this poem is different from all his other works in not advocating Communism (though it clearly does so, along with the class warfare and bitterness themes). >Have you found documentation >yet that John Kerry opposes >democracy for the Iraqis, and that >has advocated "Communism for >all"? Silly rabbit, where did I ever say Kerry opposes democracy for Iraqis (though he DID say that it's not important; stability is) or that Kerry advocates Communism? You need a class in reading comprehension. Hint: read the last paragraph CAREFULLY and don't let that rage at my failure to worship Kerry blind you this time. Who opposes Iraqi freedom? Who advocates Communism? Why, the anti-freedom protesters. And by using a poem that expresses their point of view so well as his campaign theme, Kerry is just trying to get their votes, you see. Why is it almost always necessary to explain things to a Liberal as you would to a six-year-old child? One has to spell everything out in the simplest of terms so they don't twist it or fail to grasp one's meaning. And they dare denigrate the Right as being simple... hah! | ||
| Ted Burke May 24, 2004 12:28 PM PDT <I KNEW this idiot would get around to calling me a racist sooner or later< I didn't call you a racist; I said you sound like you have a problem with minorities acquiring rights due them."Racist" is the term you thought of, and I'll leave you to wonder if it's a self-diagnosis. I didn't deny Hughes was a Communist, which makes another accusation you can't support with a direct quote from my responses. I talked about the substance of Hughe's particular line and Kerry's use of it, and you still want want to fight the Cold War. Substance interests you not a wit, it seems. <where did I ever say Kerry opposes democracy for Iraqis (though he DID say that it's not important; stability is) or that Kerry advocates Communism? < Right here:"Well, at least it does express the attitude of the anti-war activists Kerry once represented as a leader of the Vietnam Veterans Against the War, and those who still oppose freedom and democracy for the Iraqi people, while advocating Communism for all." --JM These are your words, friend, and they assert that Kerry is among those who oppose Iraqi freedom and democracy and advocates "communism for all". This is exactly the way you want the reader to take it, and it's a sloppy bit of arguing. Now you try to back off the remark. Busted, me thinks. >why does Kerry approve of his Communist cheerleading?< You still haven't shown where he "cheerleads" for communism. It's a convenient fantasy you can't support with documented quotes. | ||
| JM May 24, 2004 01:30 PM PDT Well, I'm certainly not going to get into a stupid argument about who said what, when the words are plainly still there to be read. I'll leave it to others to read if they wish, and decide who said what when. Not to mention how amazing it is that you even misinterpret the very words you quote, because the (deliberate?) misinterpretation suits your purpose better. Just... amazing. | ||
| Ted Burke May 24, 2004 02:17 PM PDT All in all, it's a still a mighty big hat you're talking through. See you at the voting booth. | ||
| Jamie May 25, 2004 07:41 PM PDT This is off subject, but if you get a chance, go here and read this article. It will make you think twice about listening to Carole King, Jimmy Buffett, Bonnie Rait (damn) and others.... http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1138598/posts | ||
| Jamie May 25, 2004 08:55 PM PDT Anything new about the 9/11 Commission? I just read this article on NewsMax: http://tinyurl.com/2axvo Its about the reason behind Jamie Gorelick's infamous memo which put up the roadblock for info sharing between agencies. Do you suppose that this is the reason behind Gorelick being selected for the committee? To prevent her from having to testify? | ||
| JM May 26, 2004 09:12 AM PDT I think the 9/11 inquisition crawled back into their holes after their unprecedented and unwarranted attack on New York's Finest -- the NYPD and the FDNY. Men and women who went above and beyond the call of duty in a way never before required, only to be derided as having an organisation unworthy of "boy scouts". After Ashcroft exposed the utter fraud of allowing Jamie Gorelick to sit on instead of being interrogated by the commission, the jig was up and the joke was over. | ||
| Milo May 30, 2004 10:20 AM PDT I think you're confusing patriotism with fundamentalism. | ||
| HTC3 August 22, 2004 10:26 PM PDT It is amazing how people are so quick to pass judgement on others. I post this not in Kerry's defense, for everyone is entitled to their own opinions. However, I cannot believe that you would slander Langston Hughes' name without knowing much about him. First of all, let's post the whole poem, and let's not judge this one poem based on other poems he has written. Langston Hughes wrote about the black experience. The black experience is a hard struggle. I could understand why he would search for an alternate party, i.e. communism, because of the legalized racism and hypocrisy in the government of that day. Many blacks were bitter in the 1940s. I do not condone communism, however, once again, everyone is entitled to their opinion. Also, you must realize that just because Hughes wrote one or two poems about communism, it doesn't mean that everything he says is discredited, as though stained with the red blood of communism. Many of these poems were written with deep sarcasm. In "Let America be America Again", Langston Hughes speaks out for anyone who has felt oppresion and the greed of some in higher places. So, let us post this poem and let you decide for yourself. Let America be America again. Let it be the dream it used to be. Let it be the pioneer on the plain Seeking a home where he himself is free. (America never was America to me.) Let America be the dream the dreamers dreamed-- Let it be that great strong land of love Where never kings connive nor tyrants scheme That any man be crushed by one above. (It never was America to me.) O, let my land be a land where Liberty Is crowned with no false patriotic wreath, But opportunity is real, and life is free, Equality is in the air we breathe. (There's never been equality for me, Nor freedom in this "homeland of the free.") Say, who are you that mumbles in the dark? And who are you that draws your veil across the stars? I am the poor white, fooled and pushed apart, I am the Negro bearing slavery's scars. I am the red man driven from the land, I am the immigrant clutching the hope I seek-- And finding only the same old stupid plan Of dog eat dog, of mighty crush the weak. I am the young man, full of strength and hope, Tangled in that ancient endless chain Of profit, power, gain, of grab the land! Of grab the gold! Of grab the ways of satisfying need! Of work the men! Of take the pay! Of owning everything for one's own greed! I am the farmer, bondsman to the soil. I am the worker sold to the machine. I am the Negro, servant to you all. I am the people, humble, hungry, mean-- Hungry yet today despite the dream. Beaten yet today--O, Pioneers! I am the man who never got ahead, The poorest worker bartered through the years. Yet I'm the one who dreamt our basic dream In the Old World while still a serf of kings, Who dreamt a dream so strong, so brave, so true, That even yet its mighty daring sings In every brick and stone, in every furrow turned That's made America the land it has become. O, I'm the man who sailed those early seas In search of what I meant to be my home-- For I'm the one who left dark Ireland's shore, And Poland's plain, and England's grassy lea, And torn from Black Africa's strand I came To build a "homeland of the free." The free? Who said the free? Not me? Surely not me? The millions on relief today? The millions shot down when we strike? The millions who have nothing for our pay? For all the dreams we've dreamed And all the songs we've sung And all the hopes we've held And all the flags we've hung, The millions who have nothing for our pay-- Except the dream that's almost dead today. O, let America be America again-- The land that never has been yet-- And yet must be--the land where every man is free. The land that's mine--the poor man's, Indian's, Negro's, ME-- Who made America, Whose sweat and blood, whose faith and pain, Whose hand at the foundry, whose plow in the rain, Must bring back our mighty dream again. Sure, call me any ugly name you choose-- The steel of freedom does not stain. From those who live like leeches on the people's lives, We must take back our land again, America! O, yes, I say it plain, America never was America to me, And yet I swear this oath-- America will be! Out of the rack and ruin of our gangster death, The rape and rot of graft, and stealth, and lies, We, the people, must redeem The land, the mines, the plants, the rivers. The mountains and the endless plain-- All, all the stretch of these great green states-- And make America again! P.S. Langston Hughes considers communism at one point in his life, he writes a poem that has nothing to do with communism, then Kerry uses words from the poem, and all of a sudden, Kerry=Communist, What?! | ||
| JM August 22, 2004 11:20 PM PDT >I could understand why he would >search for an alternate party, i.e. >communism Right. He was a Communist. That's what I said. His poetry reflects that. If you can't see the Communist tone of the poem, you've got ideological blinders on. PS - I put in a LINK to the entire poem so I didn't HAVE to put the whole damn thing in. Welcome to the Web. I would just delete your post because it's so long, but you'd probably say I'm infringing on some imaginary right to post mile-long comments on people's blogs. | ||
| Leave a Comment: |