Entry: For What Shall It Profit A Democrat? Wednesday, October 20, 2004



I began to write a satire in which John Kerry accused President Bush of wanting to draft senior citizens to work in Halliburton's clandestine oil rigs, but it didn't seem funny. I scrapped it and began again, writing a spoof news report in which Kerry blamed Bush for the Black Death. That didn't seem very funny, either... then I realised why. If he thought it would gain him a single vote, Kerry would actually make these denunciations and more.

If you listen to the wild accusations and unfounded charges Kerry and his mouthpieces are leveling at President Bush, it seems that the Democrats are growing increasingly desperate. Almost 18 solid months of nonstop Bush-bashing, and they still can't quite manage to push Kerry ahead of the President in the polls to any degree. As Kerry winds down towards the end of his unusually negative campaign, it's clear that the only thing that keeps him from going under is the rhetoric of hate and fear. Whenever the news of the day can be spun to make Bush look bad, Kerry gains a temporary point or two. As long as he and his surrogates keep churning out the muck, Kerry's campaign can tread water. According to the Democrats, President Bush will steal your Grandma's social security check, draft everyone between the ages of 18 and 35 to die in wars of conquest, turn anyone left alive in the country into a corporate slave, insist on a throne instead of a seat at the UN, destroy the environment (presumably just because he hates it so), and personally infect any surviving Americans with the flu out of sheer malice. That's not America they're having drug-induced nightmares about -- it's Mordor! It's almost incomprehensible how they manage to make these allegations with straight faces. No wonder they seem so chummy with most Hollywood actor types and vice-versa... there's a hint of professional respect there. When asked why there's not the slightest hint of evidence of any such evil and violent purposes, not to mention the fact that no President could act on those intentions without the backing of Congress, glib Democrats tell gullible potential voters that these are all Bush's Secret Evil Plans, for Doing Evil Things in Secret. Of course you can't prove their existence -- They hide the evidence too well! Democrats aren't merely out of touch with mainstream America, they're getting out of touch with reality altogether. Are you really dumb enough to swallow this kind of two-dimensional cartoonish fantasy hype? John Kerry is counting on it.

Kerry's campaign digs itself a deeper hole every day with this sort of baseless drivel. Not even the miracle cures promised by John Edwards (if he and Kerry are elected) can save the Democrats from the mud they've chosen to cover themselves with. Even if they somehow manage to convince enough people to vote for Kerry out of hate and fear, the low moral standards of Democrat campaigning has still doomed them. Not being a religious person, I'm not given to quoting the Bible. (In fact, I'll admit that I'm really quoting the Bruce Willis/Tom Hanks movie "Bonfire of the Vanities," based on the Tom Wolfe novel.) But one question from that book applies to the Left: For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? * 

John Edwards promised that "If we do the work that we can do in this country, the work that we will do when John Kerry is president, people like Christopher Reeve are going to get up out of that wheelchair and walk again." Hallelujah! John Kerry scares young people and parents with hints about "the great potential of a draft," though every responsible person in the chain of command, up to and including President Bush, has unequivocally stated that there will definitely not be a draft. (In reality, the only people who proposed a draft were Democrats, and that as a political tool. Therefore, it must be a Secret Evil Plan!) Both Kerry and Edwards feel it's "fair game" to drag Dick Cheney's daughter Mary into the conversation when the subject of gay marriage comes up. Don't they know any other gay people? Kerry even accuses the President of responsibility for the shortage of flu shots... despite the fact that the only reason flu vaccines are in short supply, and manufactured overseas, is that manufacturers are too liable to litigation. By definition, after all, vaccines make some people sick. According to Jim Copeland of the Manhattan Institute, "From the early to mid-1980s, as tort litigation exploded, the number of U.S. vaccine manufacturers fell from 15 to three... So Congress took vaccines out of the courts and instead created a 'no-fault' system, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program... In recent years, however, the congressional safeguards have been eroded as enterprising trial lawyers have circumvented the law." Logic and reason, however, will not stop Kerry and Edwards from fear- and hate-mongering in hopes of scraping up enough votes to win the White House. No lie too big, no issue too small, no slander too vile to be used by Democrats to attack Bush.

The Democrats have already lost their souls in this drive for power. Whether it shall profit them is up to you.

* Note to the overly sensitive rabidly anti-religious reader: substitute "that which is moral, noble and ideal in the human heart" if the phrase "his own soul" gives you galloping hysteria. Sheesh.

   6 comments

John Wilkinson
October 22, 2004   10:48 AM PDT
 
You wrote, "Both Kerry and Edwards feel it's "fair game" to drag Dick Cheney's daughter Mary into the conversation when the subject of gay marriage comes up. Don't they know any other gay people?"

I'm sure they do. Oddly enough, however, only one of them happens to be a campaign director for the party that wants to mount a constitutional amendment that would prevent her from marrying her partner.

Unconvincing crocodile tears.
JM
October 22, 2004   11:05 AM PDT
 
I'll just bet you'd be crying had Gephardt been chosen as the Dem nominee and Bush and Cheney used his daughter Chrissy to make a political attack on him. I'll bet you'd be screaming had Bush and Cheney chosen to use Kerry's daughter, who wore a see-through dress in Cannes, as an example of how morals and decency would continue to degrade under a Liberal administration. I'll bet you'd be weeping if Bush and Cheney had chosen to use Edwards' wife as an example of how the health risks posed by obesity would cause manufacturers be subject to frivolous lawsuits on a trial lawyer's watch. I'll bet you'd be howling mad had Bush and Cheney chosen to use Kerry's sister's scare-fest campaign stop in Australia as an example of how showing fear in the face of terrorism gives terrorists power over us. However, Bush and Cheney have something NO ONE in the Kerry/Edwards camp has -- class. It's long been a rule that wives and children are OFF LIMITS as attack points, even when they stump for the candidates. Kerry and Edwards are so intent on their power grab that there are no rules they won't break. So keep your sanctimonious garbage to yourself.
Lea
October 22, 2004   03:09 PM PDT
 
Great post...you shuold be on a commentary program somewhere. You have a great way of explaining the facts. Talk radio, maybe??? I would listen!
Ann
October 22, 2004   04:03 PM PDT
 
Allow me to add to the list of indecencies promulgated by the Kerry Edwards campaign. Their recent [crass] use of C. Reeve's widow on the stump represents a new low in politics. Reeve has yet to be buried or memoralized in a service - I believe he has been cremated and a memorial service is being planned at this moment. Yet, the Dem's feel it is appropriate to manipulate American's grief over the loss of a tragic public figure to push its campaign- in addition to the manipulation of his widow's grief for political gain. Do not be fooled into believing that Kerry or Edwards strongly and vehemently support stem cell research; they only perceive that supporting the research at this juncture in the campaign might yield them more votes in swing states. Case in point: if the Kerry-Edwards campaign harbored principled support for stem cell research, why haven't they given the same treatment to Ron Reagen, the deceased President's son, who spoke on the topic at the Democratic Convention, at every campaign stop?
Jamie
October 22, 2004   10:18 PM PDT
 
These are not my words (I just read them on a website), but they reflect the way I feel about the "issues":

"If the undecided and leaning are still confused about analyzing issues and comparing the responses, I’d like to help the "special" people with a suggestion.

Most of the people who died on 9-11 had a job with health care and retirement benefits. The air at ground zero became an environmental disaster within seconds. A strong economy depends on keeping commercial airline ballistic missiles from being launched into Wall Street. Social security is more than an adequate pension; it requires living long enough to retire. "No Child Left Behind" has taken on special meaning with the news that federal agents have advised school district officials in Georgia, Florida, Michigan, New Jersey, Oregon and California that al Qaeda may have American children in their cross-hairs. The most important thing isn’t finding WMDs in Iraq—it’s not finding them here.

On November 2, keep in mind what mattered most on 9-11."

In other words, none of those issues matter if we are not safe.
Buddha
October 23, 2004   03:02 PM PDT
 
Kerry's campaign and his supporters are self-serving hypocrites. For example, JFK rails against outsourcing, yet the majority of his bumper stickers I see are on imports. The few I see on domestic vehicles are predominantly on SUVs which I presume are rendered enviro-friendly by the Kerry/Edwards sticker. If the Red Sox lose the World Series, I'm sure JFK will blame that on W as well.

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments