|
Do you ever wonder where your federal taxes go, and why small-government Conservatives believe they should be reduced? Well, how about the Center for Grape Genetics at Cornell, in Geneva, NY? I'm all in favor of better American grapes, since I don't drink French wines as much as I used to, but shouldn't that sort of research be market-driven? Instead, $3 million of our tax dollars are paying for research into better hybrids and more disease-resistant grapes in NY, and another $3 million is going to fund the same sort of research at the Grape Genomics Research Center in Davis, CA. How about B.B. King? He's a talented musician, and he's probably a nice guy. But why are $1 million of our federal taxes going to the B.B. King Museum Foundation in Indianola, MS? Do all taxpayers at least get one free ticket to a show? There's no reason the taxes of someone from Pennsylvania should be used for "sidewalks, street furniture and facade improvements" in Bakersfield, California. Frankly, I don't care what your town looks like. If I'm paying for anyone's new furniture, it'll be my own. If you live in Bakersfield, and you think the place needs fixing up, then it should be paid for with local or state taxes, if not private donations. Why is the US government spending $280,000 to take care of a local matter? This is precisely why we need to cut federal taxes even further. There's obviously no shortage of federal (meaning taxpayer) funds, as the Left would have us believe. The problem is how they're being spent, and the fact that Congress decided to raise the federal debt ceiling in order to spend more. A non-partisan group called Citizens Against Government Waste has identified $22.9 billion in pork barrel spending crammed into the $388 billion omnibus spending package recently passed by Congress. A partial state-by-state list of pork in the bill includes:
Every politician from every state has a snout in the trough. Although Senator John McCain (R-AZ) derided the $1 million Wild American Shrimp Initiative as "this 'no shrimp left behind' act," Arizona still received a share of the slop (though usually smaller than most, thanks to McCain and fellow AZ Senator John Kyl). Even Guam is getting $515,000 for brown tree snake management. Politicians try to rationalise pork-barrel waste by saying that the tax dollars taken by the federal government are returned to the states for use, but they forget one thing: no one old enough to pay taxes was born yesterday. The US government is one big money-laundering scheme for special interest groups. Taxes flow in... and then they flow back out. Everyone along the route takes a bite. No party or politician is immune... not if they want to get campaign contributions come next election cycle. There are a few ways to reduce both the wasteful spending and the influence of special interest groups. The simplest is to reduce the amount of money politicians can hand them... which means reducing the amount of spare money Congress has to waste in the first place. The loopholes and all that "wiggle room" politicians and special interests use to their advantage have to be removed from the Byzantine tax code. The sort of simplification President Bush is proposing would rob the lobbyists and special interests of their free ride, and would keep politicians from getting in bed with them to the extent they do now. Also, simpler tax codes would encourage economic growth and increase tax revenues, which would reduce that debt -- but only if spending is kept down. A lot of power is wielded by Congress, which can grant tax exemptions to certain groups as well as direct where our tax money is spent. Politicians use those powers to gain favorable press and publicity, which translate to votes. A way to curb the misuse of those powers would be to institute term limits for Representatives and Senators. Politicians who aren't constantly working on their next campaign might be able to spare some time to do the work they were put in office to do. Lobbyists can't make deals with politicians who won't be in office next year. The best way of all, of course, would be to keep an eye on how your Representative and Senators vote to spend your money, and vote them out when they waste it. Politicians count on our not paying attention, though... and they're usually right. In any case, you should be the best person to decide how your money is spent. What benefits do the average taxpayers derive from all this pork? There's $150,000 going for Fishing Rationalisation Research in Alaska. Does every taxpayer in America get a coupon for salmon at their local supermarket for funding that? (Besides, isn't "the need to eat" rationalisation enough for fishing?) Do we each at least get one free pony ride at the Horse Springs Ranch in NM, which got $2.5 million? $3.5 million of our money went for "bus acquisition" in Atlanta, GA. Every American taxpayer gets to ride for free in Atlanta, right? I'd like to know more about how my money is spent -- perhaps there are good reasons for some of it, but we never get the benefit of an explanation. I'm very curious, for instance, about the $1.5 million that we're paying to "transport naturally chilled water from Lake Ontario to Lake Onondaga." I'd also like to know more about the $150,000 apiece the federal government is giving to the Grammy Foundation, the "Check 'Em Out Program," the Coca-Cola Space Science Center in Columbus, GA and the "Obscenity Crimes Project." All this pork barrel spending is causing obscenity crimes right at this moment, as I discovered by taking a poll of People Writing This Article. Now, give ME that $150,000 for the research I've done. And don't forget my new furniture. |
| Mike November 27, 2004 05:33 PM PST Funny how the folks in places like Oregon are getting money to research wood products when many of them don't want any forest touched. | ||
| Wormy November 27, 2004 05:50 PM PST dude, i didnt get money for that research paper my 6th grade teacher tore up. dont expect so much. hehe. | ||
| Jamie November 28, 2004 01:31 AM PST One thing they need to do is cut back on the funding of projects like the "Big Dig" in Boston - originally proposed to cost 2.6 billion, it wound up costing 14.6 BILLION dollars. 60 percent of its funding was from federal dollars! John McCain once called the project “the biggest, most costly public works project in U.S. history.” interesting article on the Big Dig: http://www.showmenews.com/2004/Feb/20040208News030.asp | ||
| Korla Pundit November 28, 2004 09:32 AM PST The line item veto would help at least with some of this. But I think it would be even better if there was a rule in Congress where necessary spending was voted on separately from discretionary grabs like these. | ||
| seneca November 30, 2004 10:45 PM PST In europe in nearly all the states you can find public televisions, and in a federal state you can find public televisions in all the states, limited governments now. | ||
| dk December 8, 2004 11:14 AM PST Sounds like a great oppurtunity for Pres. Bush to lead. A veto would keep him from being the first full term pres. since the 1850's to not veto a bill. Don't hold your breath. Vote libertarian. | ||
| JM December 8, 2004 12:07 PM PST Line item veto would be much better. As for Libertarians... no thanks. They will never be a serious party as long as they're social Liberals. | ||
| Westfall Papers January 1, 2005 01:03 PM PST Very interesting site ! | ||
| Matt March 31, 2005 06:26 PM PST Ridiculous article. Federal $$$ for projects dont necessarily benefit everyone evenly. True, furniture in Bakersfield doesn't benefit this hick who wrote the article living in West Virginia. But, does the interchange in Los Angeles benefit the New York resident? Does the road widening in Atlanta benefit the Atlanta resident who commutes on a bicycle? Federal Aid $$$ for transportation projects are collected from your local gas pump and distributed by formula back to the states and local agencies. The state and locals decided which projects will be funded. The federal government is involved to make sure that project are in the best public interest and that federal requirement are met. Dont see anything wrong with that. | ||
| Leave a Comment: |