|
The following email arrived in response to my 7 July 2005 blog entry, London and the Long War, which was reprinted in American Daily. After responding to it, I thought I should post his letter here, along with my reply. My reply to his email: Thanks for writing; I know it's a difficult time for all of you. Oddly enough, the terrorists followed the Nazi playbook exactly, and seem to have achieved the same result. Bombing Guernica resulted in Spanish capitulation (to Franco), but bombing London, hoping for a similar loss of nerve, resulted in resolute opposition. The barbaric scum of the Earth never learn... lucky for us. |
| Jamie July 9, 2005 10:53 AM PDT Thank you SO Much for sharing that with us. It is good to know that there are people in Great Britain that do not ascribe to the "appease the terrorists at all costs" idea. Thank God for the Internet, because otherwise we would never know about people like the courageous gentleman who wrote that letter. This morning I sent an email to Derrick Jackson of the Boston Globe, letting him know exactly what I thought about his recent column which blames the attack on London on the "killing innocents in Iraq" by U.S. forces and "fueling terrorism". I was so angry after reading it. | ||
| Name July 9, 2005 11:38 AM PDT Thank youfor your comment and the letter fromLondon.I was born in London and my sister sti lllives there I can only hope this wakes up the "war on terror" is an artifact of the Americans/Republicans people who are busy in Brtain and Canada sapping people's resolve and dousing their legitimate anger. Anger will save us! | ||
| Paladin July 9, 2005 02:00 PM PDT Told you : ) | ||
| JM July 9, 2005 02:12 PM PDT Yes, you did. (Paladin's the one who suggested I post the email.) | ||
| The Outlaw Michael Cosyns July 10, 2005 09:02 PM PDT I agree. Anger will save us. To the British Citizen from London, if you happen to read this: my thoughts and prayers are with you. I must say that I was very pleased and impressed by the staunch, defiant attitude displayed by all Londoners I saw on my TV, including two women 70-plus years of age. In a way, that attitude was marvellous. Reminds me of Drake at Plymouth who wanted to complete his ballgame when the Armada was spotted. Hold on tight! Kindest regards from Belgium! | ||
| Terrorist-loving lefty July 11, 2005 01:22 PM PDT Fact: No Al-Qaeda in Iraq prior to US invasion. Fact: No Saddam-Al-Qaeda link. Reminder: Bin-Laden still on the loose, thanks to US re-direction of special forces to Iraq. Reminder: Al Qaeda is a global operation. They ain't all in Iraq "so we can fight them there rather than here". Dumbasses. | ||
| SKYE July 11, 2005 04:32 PM PDT Cav, Would you like the honor of debunking yet another misguided terrorist loving lefty? I'll bring the popcorn :) | ||
| Jamie July 11, 2005 05:55 PM PDT There is some interesting reading material at this link: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=31597 Of course, we all know that Mr/Ms Terrorist-loving leftie can READ, it is comprehension may be lacking. For example, the fool thinks that by capturing ONE MAN (OBL), the War on Terror will be over. | ||
| JM July 11, 2005 05:59 PM PDT >Fact: No Al-Qaeda in Iraq prior to >US invasion. Fact: No Saddam-Al- >Qaeda link. 1. Who told you the War on Terror was all about al-Qaeda? Have you never heard of Abu Nidal, Abu Abbas, Abdul Rahman Yassin and Khala Khadr al-Salahat, all of whom were terrorists living large in Iraq at Saddam's expense? 2. Have you never heard of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, who was sheltered by Saddam after fleeing the overthrow of the Taliban? Have you never heard of Salman Pak, where very religious non-Iraqis were trained in terror techniques including hijacking and WMDs? That's just a start. >Reminder: Bin-Laden still on the >loose, thanks to US re-direction of >special forces to Iraq. What a silly thing to say. You think Special Forces are supposed to shine a flashlight into every cave in Afghanistan? What a waste of their training and talents. But then again, Liberals know nothing about the US military... except that they despise it. >Reminder: Al Qaeda is a global >operation. They ain't all in >Iraq "so we can fight them there >rather than here". Well, if you'd like to supply another location that bin Laden refers to as the "central battle" in the war against the Great Satan (that's you and me, slick), we'd all like to hear it. >Dumbasses. That's a great signature. Are there more than one of you, or do you have MPD? | ||
| JM July 11, 2005 06:01 PM PDT >For example, the fool thinks that >by capturing ONE MAN (OBL), the >War on Terror will be over. Liberals, with their comic-book view of the universe, seem to think that bin Laden is the Doctor Doom of Terror; that once we put him behind bars all terrorism everywhere will come to an end. | ||
| Terrorist-loving lefty July 11, 2005 06:47 PM PDT <i>Liberals, with their comic-book view of the universe, seem to think that bin Laden is the Doctor Doom of Terror; that once we put him behind bars all terrorism everywhere will come to an end.</i> Ho-Ho! Seems I've unleashed a veritable shitstorm of wingnut blowhards! Pardon my ignorance, but wasn't it Al-Qaeda that was the sole pertetrator of 9/11? Which of the other groups that you cite have anywhere near the financing or organization of Al-Qaeda? Abbas, Nidal et.al were old news. Tell me this - if they posed such a threat by their very presence in Iraq, then why didn't Bush attack them immediately upon gaining the WH? Wasn't he more preoccupied with such national security issues as tax-cuts, deficit-spending and month-long vacations? "Bin-Laden determined to strike in US" ring a bell ladies? | ||
| Terrorist-loving lefty July 11, 2005 06:57 PM PDT "Well, if you'd like to supply another location that bin Laden refers to as the "central battle" in the war against the Great Satan (that's you and me, slick), we'd all like to hear it." WOW! I bet that statement gives Iraqis all kindsa joy! Being as we bombed the living daylights out of their cities and now -BONUS!- they get to be the "flypaper". I'll bet Iran is on the line to Bush this very moment requesting similar treatment...</guffaw> | ||
| JM July 11, 2005 07:08 PM PDT >WOW! I bet that statement gives >Iraqis all kindsa joy! You're right; I'll bet they hate bin Laden and all his terrorist minions by now. >Being as we bombed the living >daylights out of their cities Were you watching an old WWII movie while typing that? Can you name a single city that the living daylights were bombed out of besides Fallujah, and that after the residents were allowed to evacuate? Please, stop with the rhetorical devices; they only reinforce the view of Liberals as weak-minded fools, mindlessly repeating Islamofascist propaganda. >they get to be the "flypaper". Yes, it's downright wrong of al Qaeda to do that to Iraqis, when they could have either left them alone or elped them. Then again, only Liberals think terrorists are the "good guys." | ||
| Terrorist-loving lefty July 11, 2005 07:20 PM PDT "Then again, only Liberals think terrorists are the "good guys." And it's me using "rhetorical devices" eh? "You're right; I'll bet they hate bin Laden and all his terrorist minions by now." You're SO right. I can picture freedom-loving Iraqis holed up in their homes thinking "gee, life sure would be a lot easier if that Bin Laden guy hadn't sent them planes into the twin-towers." Yep. Couldn't see that myself because I'm a "weak-minded" liberal. What other wonderful theories have you got on tap to explain the disaster that is Iraq, genius? | ||
| Terrorist-loving lefty July 11, 2005 07:22 PM PDT Hey - can you guys start a thread on the Rove matter? I have an opinion....<snicker> | ||
| JM July 11, 2005 07:33 PM PDT >I can picture freedom-loving >Iraqis holed up in their homes That's the problem with you Liberals -- it's all about what you picture in your heads, instead of what's going on in reality. And if you think that most Iraqis aren't happy to see Saddam gone, you're too deep in self-delusion for me to help you. | ||
| Jamie July 11, 2005 07:36 PM PDT > I can picture freedom-loving > Iraqis holed up in their homes > thinking "gee, life sure would be > a lot easier if that Bin Laden guy > hadn't sent them planes into the > twin-towers." -- Under Saddam's regime many hundreds of thousands of people died as a result of his actions, the vast majority of them Muslims. According to a 2001 Amnesty International report, "victims of torture in Iraq are subjected to a wide range of forms of torture, including the gouging out of eyes, severe beatings, and electric shocks ... some victims have died as a result and many have been left with permanent physical and psychological damage." There have been documented chemical attacks by the regime, from 1983 to 1988, resulting in some 30,000 Iraqi and Iranian deaths. Human Rights Watch estimates that Saddam's 1987-1988 campaign of terror against the Kurds killed at least 50,000 and possibly as many as 100,000 Kurds. The Iraqi regime used chemical agents to include mustard gas and nerve agents in attacks against at least 40 Kurdish villages between 1987-1988.-- Oh yes, life was so much easier under Saddam. | ||
| JM July 11, 2005 07:38 PM PDT >the disaster that is Iraq If you want a disaster, go to Kosovo. If you want to see a country getting back on its feet despite 30 years of totalitarian rule, look at Iraq. Here's part 25 of "Good News from Iraq," though I doubt you'll read it: http://chrenkoff.blogspot.com/2005/04/good-news-from-iraq-part-25.html | ||
| Terrorist-loving lefty July 11, 2005 07:41 PM PDT "That's the problem with you Liberals -- it's all about what you picture in your heads, instead of what's going on in reality." HA-HA-HA! Oh, it's the LIBERALS that have no sense of reality! Really! HA-HA! That takes the freakin' biscuit. Listen up Kool-Aiders - who else do you think believes this crapola about the invasion of Iraq being justified? The number is dwindling by the hour baby. It's been bullshit from day 1. How many Americans must die before we end this folly - while the likes of fighting-keyboarders such as the gang on this board eke out shifting justification after justification - and it's just so darn pitiful. Bring the kids home now and impeach Bush. Lefty out. | ||
| JM July 11, 2005 07:42 PM PDT Well, that's the usual reaction from Liberals when their lies are answered -- ad hominems and more childish insults. Further posts from this idiot will be deleted. | ||
| skye July 11, 2005 09:06 PM PDT The only intelligent comment from our terrorist loving lefty on this thread. ------------------------------- Lefty out. | ||
| Paladin July 12, 2005 01:32 PM PDT I have yet to see any shifts in justification as old lefty (or i prefer his Dumbasses title) there points out. As far as i can tell it's always been a war on terror not just against Al-qaeda. They just happened to be the most important. Dumbasses there seems to be the type of person who wouldn't hold the door for a mother pushing a baby carrige. It is sad that there are such selfish and deluded people out there. They say it takes all kinds but i THINK the genepool could do without that particular type. | ||
| Leave a Comment: |