|
For years, the Left has been telling us that the innocent, victimised Palestinian people (actually Egyptians and Jordanians) just want peace with those nasty bullies from Israel. Well, the Palestinians themselves finally got the chance to tell the world what they really want. A free and open election in the Palestinian territories has put an Iran-backed terrorist group in power, a group that has sworn to destroy Israel. How "peace-loving" is that? The Fatah party openly favored negotiation with Israel leading to a two-state solution and an independent Palestine. Hamas, the largest and most influential Muslim fundamentalist movement in the Palestinian territories, entered the political fray with a platform based on the death of all Jews, and the utter destruction of Israel. Unfortunately, the party with peace talks and negotiation in mind was voted out due to corruption scandals and inability to keep order in the cities. That put the party with "a bomb on every bus" for a motto in control, to everyone's surprise. Hamas is a terror group formed in 1987 to push for the eradication of Israel. An essential part of their ideology is that the Palestinian problem is religious, and therefore can never be solved by political compromise. They believe that the land "from the [Jordan] river to the sea" is consecrated to Islam. It cannot be given up, not even a part of it, especially not Jerusalem. Hamas is an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, the group of Arab fanatics that served as an arm of Nazi intelligence during WWII. Hamas now receives a majority of its funding from Iran, funneled through Hezbollah and other groups. A December 2000 intelligence report, for instance, showed that Iran transferred $1,200,000 to Hamas's Qassam Brigades to support 'the Hamas military arm in Israel and encouraging suicide operations.' According to the Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center at the Center for Special Studies, Iranian support for Hamas and other terrorist organisations is widespread:
The fact that Hamas runs soup kitchens and health clinics in the Palestinian territories doesn't make up for bombed-out buses and restaurants in Israel. Such community support is useful to terrorist groups needing good will from the populace, not evidence of pure civic-mindedness. Luckily, that's a lesson the terrorists in Iraq never managed to learn, or the (mostly Sunni) insurgents would not be starting to turn against them now. So the Palestinian people elected Hamas to 74 of the 132 seats in their parliament. Must we treat Hamas as a legitimate political entity if they continue to carry out terrorist attacks? Of course not. President Bush has already warned Hamas that US aid to the Palestinian Authority depends on the cessation of terrorist attacks and the repudiation of their intention to destroy Israel. It was bad enough when the Palestinian government pretended to have no control over Hamas... now the Palestinian government is Hamas. Our tax dollars should not go to support Hamas or any other terror group... especially when they already have enough support from Iran. Our resolve to prevent Iran from building a nuclear device must be stronger than ever, now that Iran has a willing delivery system on Israel's doorstep. Israel's security fence may be their best protection from Palestinian terrorists armed with pipe bombs... but it won't stop a nuclear weapon. Does this election mean, as many Liberals would like to claim, that democracy has failed and freedom in the Middle East is a pipe dream? Hardly. It merely drives home the lesson that open elections are not the sole component of democracy; that along with freedom comes responsibility. Choices do have consequences. If Hamas renounces terrorism and behaves as a legitimate government, international repercussions will likely be few. The new government already faces the possibility of civil war within the Palestinian territory, as even members of the police force have stormed the parliament building in protest of the Hamas victory. Some Fatah party leaders have already resigned, either through fear of their constituents or refusal to work with Hamas. There isn't much hope for peace with Israel at this point. It seems as though Ariel Sharon's gamble of surrendering Gaza in the hope of buying peace isn't going to pan out, after all. On the other hand, at least we can all dispense with the fiction that the Palestinians want peace with Israel. Demands for Mahmoud Abbas and the leaders of the Fatah party to resign will probably shift to calls for party reform in the near future, as even the most violent Palestinians prefer fighting Israel to fighting with their own government. With any luck, the Fatah party -- or another, reform-minded party -- can gain enough of a voice to prevent Hamas from declaring all-out war with Israel. That's a road that will lead to no good for anyone. |
| RA January 31, 2006 04:48 PM PST It is time for Israel to invoke the 50 to 1 policy. For every rocket or mortar the Palestinians launch into Israel they will receive 50 in return. For every suicide bomber, Israel should launch 50 artillary shells into the bombers home town. The Palestinians need far more suffering before they are willing to sue for peace. | ||
| d'Brit February 13, 2006 02:19 AM PST Israel won't do much of anything until Sharon dies and a new head of gov. is elected. Whether the new leader has the cojones that Sharon did is problematic. On the outside chance that the new leader does have the requisite anatomy... When the attacks continue, as it increasing appears that they will, (Hamas has already stated that they won't stop Islamic Jihad's attacks) The situation will have escalated to a state of war and thus Israel needs to issue an ultimatum. That ultimatum being threefold; 1) Hamas has 24 hrs to publically abandon its charter calling for the destruction of Israel. 2) It must guarantee to end ALL attacks against Israel. 3) It also must enter into sincere negotiations, starting with recognizing Israels right to exist through publically acknowedging this before the UN. If ANY of these conditions are not met, Israel will consider that a state of total war with the Palestinians exists and permanent expulsion of ALL muslims will begin from ALL Palestinian territories... The Palestinians will be forcibly removed in their entirety from Gaza, The West bank, Jerusalem and every enclave and, that territory will henceforth be part of Israeli and lost to the Palestinians for all time. After the war and,once a treaty is finalized, Muslims will be allowed to visit Jerusalem in limited, tightly controled numbers. Israel will also announce its own policy of mutual assurred destruction. If at any point in the future, a nuclear device is detonated upon Israeli soil, it will be considered an attack by ISLAM upon Israel AND that nuclear retaliation will immediately commence against EVERY major Muslim city in the ME, with Tehran first on the list. There will be no discussion, or trying to assign responsibility, as the use of a nuclear device upon Israel will be de facto proof of willful negligence by ISLAM in keeping its fanatics under control. That a nuclear attack upon a country of Israels' size is proof of genocidal intent and that a similiar response is warranted and necessary. Hamas and the Palestinians will have reapt the whirlwind... | ||
| Namepaul b. March 12, 2006 03:09 PM PST Port deal: I have to wonder,& & kinda doubt,that "we" totaly back'd out of the "port deal". My employment has takin me to both the "Dundalk, & Seagrit ports, these are the jugular vain, of the country(2 of the ports in question). For an Entity to purchase control of these ports would have not only the funds but world political power "far beyond that of mortal men" (sorry,had to),( S) I wonder, as to the reaction of the contry, If the powers that be didnt just put out a placebo, then quietly went ahead.(as has happen'd before). On the otherhand,- You have more fingers. (sorry had to do that to) post script; I have personnaly witnessed a "shipping container,40'" that was taken off a ship at sea & brought in to an inlet, & off loaded onto a truck,the driver of the truck prob. didnt know what it was(just p/u what he was told to. ive always wondered wht was in it, & why it didnt enter through normal channels/customs. oh well guess people at my station in life may never know what goes on behind closed doors,maybe just as well. Thank you for this site, very informitive. pb. | ||
| Namepaul b. March 12, 2006 03:13 PM PST Hamas" OooKaYYY; whomever cannot figure this group out, gets to be on Point for the mine field. " Sun Tzu" was right, maybe we should listen. pb. | ||
| Leave a Comment: |