Entry: Terrorist TV Saturday, October 07, 2006



The following is a copy of the email I sent to the Sci-Fi channel.

Last night, I watched the season premiere of Battlestar Galactica, and, I have to say, was thoroughly disgusted. The writers of the show have taken its previous anti-war, anti-Bush undertone to an entirely new level. The entire episode was nothing more than a justification of terrorism committed by some of the main characters, and I'm surprised and saddened that you would allow such a thing to air on your channel.

In the show, the humans who settled a new planet are now living under the Cylon occupation. Cylons control the human puppet government, and many of the main human characters have joined the "insurgency." They send people to perform "heroic" suicide bombings that kill innocent humans as well as Cylons, and shrug off the casualties as part of the war they're fighting. They murder humans who collaborate with the Cylons. The Cylons imprison innocent people for no good reason, often torturing them while the collaborators cover for the Cylons.

All of this is obviously meant to imitate and excuse the rhetoric and tactics used by the terrorists fighting our troops in Iraq. It's apparent that the show is a paean to groups like al-Qaeda in Iraq, and an appeal to excuse terrorism on the flimsy grounds that "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter." The writers attempt to create a state of moral equivalency between the show's characters and the terrorists who murder US troops, Iraqi police and military, and Iraqi civilians every day. In order to accept such a moral equivalence, however, one must first abandon one's moral values.

Moral equivalence demands that one forego all understanding of right and wrong, and suspend one's sense of morality. Without the capacity to judge between right and wrong, people -- whole societies -- become unable to act. Criminals go unpunished, and those in need of protection go unaided. For instance, without the moral capacity to call the current ethnic murders by the government-sponsored militia in Darfur "wrong" and "immoral," the United Nations is unable to act to stop them. Due to moral paralysis, hundreds of thousands of innocent people may die, as they did in Rwanda. Is reducing the viewer's capacity to judge between right and wrong by portraying the murder of innocents as justifiable the intended goal of the Sci-Fi channel?

I cannot watch this show any longer. In fact, as long as Battlestar Galactica is on the air, I will cease to watch the Sci-Fi channel altogether. Although it may not have much impact, I will urge everyone I know personally to do the same. I will urge everyone I know on the internet to do so, and ask them to ask their friends to do so as well. Moreover, I will send copies of this letter to those who advertise on the Sci-Fi channel, to let them know what their money is buying -- no longer merely good entertainment, but thinly-veiled justifications of terrorism.

Thank you for your time.

A former viewer
UPDATE: Psycho Toddler put it so much more eloquently than I.

   8 comments

Name
October 7, 2006   12:09 PM PDT
 
Good observation . I was thinking the same thing as I watched the show. Pity, I used to enjoy it , but now unfortunately I will no longer.
SalGal
October 7, 2006   06:37 PM PDT
 
Another poison pen pal... Go Cav!
rightwingprof
October 9, 2006   10:18 AM PDT
 
I think you're reading things into the show that aren't there. <a href="http://rightwingnation.com/index.php/2006/10/08/2172/">See here</a>.
Jim
October 9, 2006   12:26 PM PDT
 
Rightwingprof is a nutjob. After looking at his website, I want to ask...is "Birth of a Nation" just a film? People write things and make movies and TV shows for a reason. You don't have an episode like that without trying to glorify the bad guys.
CavalierX
October 10, 2006   05:34 AM PDT
 
>I think you're reading things into
>the show that aren't there.

Not at all.

"I think the allegory has moved on with us. The series deals with the aftermath of 9/11 and the war on terror, the Iraq war, the war in Afghanistan – it’s imbued with things that are more current, like liberty versus freedom. Security versus freedom. The ideas of how far a society is willing to go in order to safeguard its citizens, what happens in witch trials or how the does the judicial process become a witch trial? What does it mean when you have a prisoner and you put his head in a bucket and you tell him he’s going to drown to get information out of him? Those are things happening in the world and those are things that we tackled on Galactica. This is what we do. This show is about the experience we’re having right now and trying to view that experience through the prism of science fiction. Not necessarily to make it ripped from today’s headlines, but essentially to take the themes and ideas of what is happening in the world and put them in this format and examine them from a different light and perspective."

- Ron Moore, writer/producer of Battlestar Galactica
SFX Magazine interview, 10 May 2005
Irish Diablo
October 11, 2006   11:10 AM PDT
 
The new Battlestar Galactica sucks big, hairy, dirty elephant balls! If making the Cylons human-looking wasn't bad enough, they made Starbuck a woman. WTF is that? The wirters, producers and the Sci-Fi channel should all burn in hell for that blasphemous piece of Bantha poodoo.
psychotoddler
October 18, 2006   12:22 PM PDT
 
Great post, great letter. Moral equivalence is again the main issue. This is a direct descendant of Political Correctness. If you are unable to acurately label things, you can't address them in an intelligent fashion.

Terrorism is reprehensible. But rebellion may not be. The Occupation of the Warsaw Ghetto was evil with no good intentions. The purpose of that occupation was to control the Jewish population so they could be gradually deported and murdered. Period. The uprising against it was admirable and totally correct.

To portray the Cylons as being the equivalents of the Nazis during WW2, but then compare those that fight against them to the Islamofascists who blow up civilians because they want to maintain their own rule of terror in the region and play to our press is flawed, and it tells me that the producers can't tell the difference between Nazis whose ultimate goal is genocide, and Americans, whose only interest in the region is altruistic and would be more than happy to get the hell out of there when the population can behave itself.

Nevertheless, I'm still not ready to abandon BSG. I think there's still room for hope.
Christopher Taylor
October 28, 2006   06:32 PM PDT
 
And here I thought the only reason the new Battlestar Galactica is because they turned it into a soap opera and got rid of the cool looking chrome Cylons

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments