|
Many of the things that seem to be going wrong for America today can be traced to an excess of political correctness -- if, indeed, that's not a redundant phrase. When tempered by confidence in one's self and culture, the desire not to offend others comes out as simple politeness. But when it gets out of control, as it does among Liberals, it becomes a need to prevent oneself from giving any possible hint of offense, combined with a desire to "make up" for any self-perceived racial or cultural advantage one may have, at any cost. Such desires can cause great harm to a person or a culture -- or even kill them. |
| Raposa December 28, 2006 02:56 PM PST Good point, but I take issue with your nomenclature. What you're talking about is 'sensitivity', the biggest, dumbest part of muliticulturalism. Political correctness normally refers to the stifling word choice necessary in today's multicultural world. Sure, I'm splitting hairs, but each segment of multiculturalism is dangerous. We should keep clear on what we're all referring to. Political correctness is an attempt to control thought by controlling language. Some people promote it for reasons of 'sensitivity', which goes along with your article, but others do it to split people into groups which can be managed according to conflict theory. Whatever the reason, we are bullied into using the words someone else chooses so that we will think in a manner that they desire. The word choices used in political correctness split us up into smaller and smaller tribes and prevent us from speaking clearly about important subjects. That's enough danger without loading up the term with the rest of the multicultural baggage. | ||
| Tom December 28, 2006 05:21 PM PST Whoever said that Political Correctness was correct? | ||
| Elvez73 December 28, 2006 11:04 PM PST The analysis that "political correctness" splits us into small groups and subgroups is quite wrong-headed. Contrary to the above post the founders especially Mr. Jefferson did want us to be free of religion if we so chose. Ones religion should be between a man and his God and has no place at all in our government. So called political correctness has been abused by many in places like San Francisco or other liberal enclaves, but it is mostly a creation of the right, I refer to the so called war on Christmas rhetoric of last year. True Americans are Americans first and foremost, the Constitution is a sacred text to me and everything else that I am, Anglo-Saxon, Christian, Male, etc is secondary to that. Wanting to forge a national identity devoid of ethnic or religious, or gender biases seems like a uniquely American idea to me. Noones saying for people to give up their identity, but America is stronger when we stand as one. Excess political correctness wasn't responsible for the terrorist attacks of 9-11, nor is it responsible for our misadventure in Mesopotamia. What it is, is a constant bogeyman trotted out by the right to make people afraid that they are losing their rights to godless socialist liberals, when in fact the erosion in our Constitutional rights is coming from the GOP. | ||
| JM December 29, 2006 06:21 AM PST >"political correctness" splits us >into small groups and subgroups That's multiculturalism, one doctrine of political correctness. >the founders especially Mr. >Jefferson did want us to be free of >religion if we so chose Quite wrong, of course. Do some research. Here, this may help get you started: http://www.eadshome.com/QuotesoftheFounders.htm "I am a real Christian, that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus." - Thomas Jefferson >Ones religion should be between a >man and his God and has no >place at all in our government. Except, of course, that a person's views are shaped by his or her religion. So you're proposing that only athiests should be allowed to run the country. >mostly a creation of the right Are you mad? >I refer to the so called war on >Christmas rhetoric of last year You think the RIGHT is attacking Christmas? >Excess political correctness wasn't >responsible for the terrorist >attacks of 9-11 That's the worst strawman I've ever seen, and I've seen some doozies. >erosion in our Constitutional rights >is coming from the GOP Please... this is pathetic. These Liberal talking points have been worn thin. Unless, of course, you're talking about McCain-Feingold, in which case I agree. | ||
| Hoss January 3, 2007 09:04 AM PST Saying that Political Correctness is mainly a device used by the right is perhaps one of the dumbest statements ever put forth. And, to equate its lengthy history with the right ALL the way back to the recent defense of Christmas just magnifies it's stupidity. There is an equivalency between PC and Christmas, but it lies with many on the left who use political correctness as a bludgeon to have any remnants of Christmas (and largely religion) removed from any part of the public. "What it is, is a constant bogeyman trotted out by the right ..." You couldn't possibly shred your credibility any worse, could you. I'll wait for specific examples. Political correctness is permanently attahed to the left. It's either echo their thoughts, use their terminology, and feel their guilt or you must be a misanthrope, racist, homophobe, nativist,......And if you can't recognize that as being the root cause of PC, you are lazily ignoring history. And, I'll wait for some specific examples of how the GOP is eroding our Constitutional rights. Please don't mouth non-specific platitudes about the Patriot Act. But, you could address how you reconcile the fact that LIBERAL SC Justices ignore the Constitution in favor of international law and populism, and just how that is "protecting" our rights. | ||
| Jimbob January 4, 2007 06:31 AM PST "At home, we need to remember that we are the country all others envy" HAHA Better: we are the the country that all civilized nations despise. | ||
| JM January 4, 2007 06:33 AM PST Leave, then. Don't get run over by all the people trying to get in on your way out. | ||
| Buckeye January 4, 2007 07:25 AM PST IMO being political correct is just another way of taking away freedom of speech. | ||
| Jimbob January 4, 2007 07:36 AM PST I don't think that there are any civilized countries as neighbours except Canada - and I doubt there is that much of an influx from Europe. Perhaps a few from the poorer european countries, still believing in the "land of opportunity".... Do you think there are many Canadians trying to enter and become American? | ||
| JM January 4, 2007 11:37 AM PST >I don't think that there are any >civilized countries as neighbours >except Canada Good Lord, what an amazing display of arrogance and racism. Then again, that's entirely typical of the Left. >I doubt there is that much of an >influx from Europe First of all what does that have to do with other countries envying America its power? Second of all, in 2005 there were 12,909,602 non-immmigrant admissions from Europe, 176,569 Europeans who obtained permanent legal residence in the US and and 97,482 Europeans who became naturalised US citizens. >Do you think there are many >Canadians trying to enter and >become American? Also in 2005, 21,878 Canadians obtained legal permanent residence in the US, 7,815 became naturalised US citizens and 230,905 obtained non-immigrant admission. So yeah, I guess no one wants to come here except Mexicans. | ||
| Jimbob January 5, 2007 08:03 AM PST "Good Lord, what an amazing display of arrogance and racism." Thanks - that's the first time I've been accused of a racist remark. But you're right, the phrase was not well put. By "civilized" I meant "advanced" or "modern" or "rich". It's hard to explain the concept in a single word.... I'll try and be more careful next time. "Then again, that's entirely typical of the Left." I think that's a bit unfair - I know lots of very decent and perfectly humble people who are left wing - and so do you I'm sure. Thanks for the interesting stats, higher numbers than I expected... | ||
| Leave a Comment: |