Entry: Stage-Managing Impeachment Saturday, January 06, 2007



Having taken control of both houses of Congress in the 2006 elections, the Democrats proceeded to surpass even my own worst predictions concerning their domestic policies before they even took their seats. Raising the minimum wage will hurt the small businesses that create the most jobs and slow growth in larger companies. Forcing unions on Wal-Mart will result in America's largest private employer reducing its workforce. Creating State-run "free" healthcare will make Americans (especially those among the swelling ranks of the unemployed) more directly dependent on government benefits and therefore less likely to vote for politicians who promise to reduce those benefits. Refusing to fund border security and granting amnesty as well as government assistance (like Social Security) to illegal immigrants will create a massive new group of solidly Democrat voters. Manipulating the economy and national security to solidify their majority, however, is just an appetiser before the main course: taking the Presidency without the bothersome detail of winning an election.

Many on the Right reacted with glee to the news that professional mourner Cindy Sheehan stopped stalking President Bush long enough to
lead a group in shouting down Representative Rahm Emanuel (D-IL) as he held a press conference. The Democrats courted and supported these people in order to gain power, and now it's only fair that they have to put up with the incessant whining, right? But the situation isn't as simple (or as entertaining) as it seems on the surface. I believe Sheehan -- who once deserved sympathy, then pity, and now only scorn for her shameless manipulation of her son's death -- is being used to furnish an excuse for action against President Bush. And Sheehan stands to gain some credibility, too, by attacking someone besides Bush for a change.

Those who remember their Shakespeare (they still teach Shakespeare in schools, don't they?) may recognise in the press conference disruption an echo of Richard III. After having ruthlessly murdered or discredited everyone who stood between himself and the throne, Richard (then Duke of Gloucester) set up a scene in which he would be "forced" to accept the crown against his will by the desperate pleas of London's citizens, led by the mayor. The Duke of Buckingham, who hid his own followers among the crowd to manipulate it, advised him to look busy and refuse at first, but reluctantly acquiesce to the crowd's demand:

The mayor is here at hand: intend [express] some fear;
Be not you spoke with, but by mighty suit:
And look you get a prayer-book in your hand,
And stand betwixt two churchmen, good my lord;
For on that ground I'll build a holy descant:
And be not easily won to our request:
Play the maid's part, still answer nay, and take it.
-
Richard III (Act III, scene vii)
Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (along with other Democratic leaders) graciously declared that "impeachment is off the table" right after the election, but said at the same time that "Democrats pledge civility and bipartisanship in the conduct of the work here and we pledge partnerships with Congress and the Republicans in Congress, and the president -- not partisanship." Her first act as Speaker of the House was to cut off Republicans from even offering amendments or alternatives to Democrat-sponsored bills. However, she knows that most people won't back impeachment of the President and Vice President... not without a little stage-managing. One would think that with most of Hollywood on their side, the Democrats could have found better directors to help make the dramatics a little less obvious.

Bowing to "the will of the people" as expressed by far-Left Democratic shills such as Sheehan and her swarm of sycophants, the Democrats may (reluctantly, of course) begin some sort of impeachment hearings and other trials designed to hound Bush and Cheney out of office. The next person in line for the Oval Office is -- you guessed it -- the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi. No wonder Pelosi's
four-day swearing-in celebration gala seemed more like an inauguration... or a coronation.

   4 comments

Elvez73
January 7, 2007   07:15 PM PST
 
Thats a good analysis of Sheehan, but Pelosi certainly isn't going to give much cred to the impeachment crowd, I'm all for more civility and bipartisanship, but you guys are crying like schoolgirls about the majority being unfair. Remember when Pelosi and the dems tried to get a minority rights package through that would allow more review and rights for the minority party? The GOP crushed it. Now I see that one of the minority Whips, my very own Congressman Eric Cantor says that perhaps we should reexamine that. Why should the dems even consider it when the GOP never let the proposal see the light of day?
Friend of USA
January 8, 2007   08:08 PM PST
 
One does not have to be the kind that sees conspiracy theories everywhere to smell a staged protest.

I almost feel sad for Sheehan for being used like the useful idiot that she is.
Irv Thomas
January 9, 2007   09:59 PM PST
 
I wouldn't be talking about Pelosi's swearing in seeming like "a coronation" if I were you, trog. You've had a man in the seat of power for six years, now, that wears it like he has a hereditary ownership of it.
JM
January 10, 2007   07:13 AM PST
 
I love Bush Derangement Syndrome! It makes the Liberals so easy to spot. Just watch for the telltale fleck of foam at the lips, the glaring, red-rimmed eyes and the way they have to drag President Bush into every discussion, regardless of the subject. I've seen BDS sufferers start ranting about Bush when asked whether they want paper or plastic at the grocery store, for crying out loud. Look how this one defends Pelosi's possible power grab by screeching about a man who was duly elected to the presidency twice. And who or what is "Trog" besides a Joan Crawford B-movie?

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments