Once again this past weekend, the Democratic Presidential hopefuls had their hopes of rising to national prominence completely drowned by a tidal wave of Hillary-worship. And they had to drink their bitter, unsweetened Kool-Aid with a smile.

Despite some private grumbling from operatives, the candidates say they didn't mind Hillary's presence one bit. "I think it's terrific she's going to be here," said Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) on Friday. "I think it'll help draw attention to the Democratic race. I think people are reading it completely backwards."

That must have felt like biting on tin foil.

Some people are so brainwashed by the love-cult of Hillary-worship that they want her to run for President without knowing anything more about her than that she's married to a former President. These people nurse hopeful dreams that she will, as Bob Kunst (who runs a web site devoted to convincing Hillary Clinton to run for President, as if that hasn't always been her aim) says, "She's the only one who can save the Democrats".

Lynn Cutler, a veteran Iowa activist and former national party vice chairwoman, agreed. "Everyone's thrilled to see her," Cutler said. "She's a star."

I wondered what kind of "star" Hillary really is. And so I did some research on my own (an activity many Liberals seem incapable of. Watch out -- if it's a disability, they'll be claiming government benefits for it.) and found out a few things that chilled me to the bone. Turns out she's a Red star.

Some people might be willing to gloss over her 1971 summer internship for Communist Party USA lawyer Robert Treuhaft as a "college flirtation" with Communism. It was quite a change from her membership in the Young Republicans in 1965. It certainly seems more than a passing interest, though, when you examine her 1969 Wellesley College senior thesis, which praised Saul Alinsky, a Marxist activist who advocated lying low, hiding one's true agenda, getting into the system, gaining power and then striking to bring the system down. Regarding attacking the positions of one's opponents, Alinsky said, "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." Sounds pretty much like her entire political career so far.

Aside from the Marxist angle, one could wonder how she got away scot-free, when she was the lawyer who drew up all the paperwork on the Whitewater land scheme. You could then follow that up with the fact that after two years of the billing records being missing while under subpoena, they were suddenly "discovered" in a closet in the White House... with Hillary's fingerprints all over them. Was anything missing or altered? We'll never know now, will we? They were the only copies; the originals had been destroyed.

While we're on the subject of fingerprints, you could wonder -- just a little -- about the apparent suicide of her aide, Vince Foster, upon the Whitewater scandal breaking out. He had been her aide even then, you see, and was as guilty as she. Records showed that he called her shortly before the suicide. The fingerprint connection is that his suicide note wasn't found until the third search of his briefcase, despite the fact that it had been torn in pieces... and had NO fingerprints on it. Who puts on gloves to write a suicide note...and then tears it up and shoves it in a briefcase while still wearing them? Interesting, isn't it? While on the Vince Foster question, you should probably wonder why police and Federal investigators were kept out of his office for two whole days while Hillary's White House staffers cleaned it out.

The sheer number of criminal investigations in which she figures prominently... then is somehow forgotten about... ought to at least give one pause. Personally, I'd love to have all the questions I've asked about her past answered fully and truthfully (with a few more explanations thrown in, like the $100,000 payout from Tyson Foods that she euphemestically labelled "futures trades", and her brother receiving $400,000 for getting convicted felons pardoned on Bill's last day in office). Of course, I'd also like to have all the White House furnishings that the Clintons looted returned or reimbursed too, but that's not likely to happen, either.

If you want more recent evidence of her anti-Americanism, how about Hillary Clinton's involvement with the World Federalist Association? In 1999, Hillary endorsed the WFA when she introduced Walter Cronkite at their meeting. The World Federalist Association aims to elevate the United Nations to world government status and empower the U.N. to enforce all international law. In 1986 they filed a lawsuit against the United States arguing that Article VI of the U.S. Constitution made the U.N. Charter as well as other U.N. treaties, the "supreme law of the land." Luckily, that was defeated in the courts three years later. But how can these Hillary supporters want a President whose aim is to reduce the sovereignty of the people of the United States in our own country and make us subservient to an international body which elevates countries like Libya to head its commission on Human Rights?